Dosimetric impact of rotational setup errors in volumetric modulated arc therapy for postoperative cervical cancer.
dosimetric impact
image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT)
postoperative cervical cancer
residual rotational setup error
volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
Journal
Journal of radiation research
ISSN: 1349-9157
Titre abrégé: J Radiat Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0376611
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jul 2021
10 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
18
12
2020
revised:
19
03
2021
pubmed:
1
6
2021
medline:
24
12
2021
entrez:
31
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to evaluate the impact of rotational setup errors on the doses received during postoperative volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for cervical cancer. Overall, 121 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) sets from 20 patients were rigidly registered to reference computed tomography (CT) sets based on bony landmarks. The rotational setup errors (pitch, yaw and roll) were calculated. Then, 121 CT sets involving rotational setup errors were created, and the dose distribution in these CT sets were recalculated. The recalculated dosimetric parameters for the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OAR) were compared to the reference values, and the correlation coefficients between the dosimetric parameter differences and rotational setup errors were calculated. Only the pitch setup error was moderately correlated with CTV coverage (r ≥ 0.40) and strongly correlated with V45 for the bladder (r ≥ 0.91) and V40 for the rectum, small bowel and bone marrow (r ≥ 0.91). The maximum dosimetric difference in a single fraction and overall fractions was -1.59% and -0.69% in D98 for the CTV, 11.72% and 5.17% in V45 for the bladder and -8.03% and -4.68% in V40 for the rectum, respectively. In conclusion, rotational setup errors only slightly impact dose coverage during postoperative cervical cancer VMAT. However, the pitch setup error occasionally affected the doses received by the bladder or the rectum in the overall fraction when the error was systematic. Thus, rotational setup errors should be corrected by adjusting six-degree-of-freedom (DOF) couches to reduce dosimetric differences in the OARs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34056648
pii: 6288073
doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrab044
pmc: PMC8273806
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
688-698Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI
ID : 19 K17168
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
Références
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010 May;40(5):456-63
pubmed: 20133334
Med Phys. 2007 Jun;34(6):1880-3
pubmed: 17654888
Radiother Oncol. 2008 Nov;89(2):172-9
pubmed: 18703248
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 1;65(3):934-42
pubmed: 16751076
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Jun;103(3):322-6
pubmed: 22633814
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Mar 15;46(5):1281-90
pubmed: 10725642
Springerplus. 2016 Feb 24;5:153
pubmed: 27026850
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 May;25(4):688-93
pubmed: 25675036
J Neurosurg. 2000 Dec;93 Suppl 3:219-22
pubmed: 11143252
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e645-50
pubmed: 21640508
J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1415-9
pubmed: 16952647
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Nov;105(2):220-5
pubmed: 23022176
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Feb;23(2):385-92
pubmed: 23287959
Mol Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;4(2):271-277
pubmed: 26893874
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1999 Sep;9(5):396-400
pubmed: 11240800
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Jan;110(1):9-15
pubmed: 24332675
Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Oct;91(1):39-45
pubmed: 14529660
Med Dosim. 2014 Spring;39(1):74-8
pubmed: 24393499
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1983 Aug;9(8):1177-83
pubmed: 6409854
Fertil Steril. 2012 Jun;97(6):1387-93.e1-2
pubmed: 22464082
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 1;62(3):738-44
pubmed: 15936554
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Feb;98(2):244-8
pubmed: 21159394
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991 Jun;20(6):1305-8
pubmed: 2045304
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 May 1;56(1):69-79
pubmed: 12694825
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jan;91(1081):20160777
pubmed: 29072492
Radiat Oncol. 2013 May 02;8:110
pubmed: 23638800
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Aug;104(2):257-62
pubmed: 22857803
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jan 1;85(1):230-6
pubmed: 22554583
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Apr 26;10:104
pubmed: 25927659
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Apr;21(4):22-30
pubmed: 32170991
Med Dosim. 2013 Summer;38(2):125-32
pubmed: 23266161
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1994 Jan;4(1):61-65
pubmed: 11578386
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 15;82(4):1439-44
pubmed: 21703780
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):256-62
pubmed: 21093170
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Nov 1;66(3):949-55
pubmed: 16949765