Low back pain: What is the role of YouTube content in patient education?
YouTube
low back pain
patient education
quality
video
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society
ISSN: 1554-527X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8404726
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
revised:
28
04
2021
received:
28
02
2021
accepted:
25
05
2021
pubmed:
1
6
2021
medline:
19
4
2022
entrez:
31
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to characterize the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos related to low back pain (LBP) as well as to identify factors associated with the overall video quality. A review of YouTube was performed using two separate search strings. Video-specific characteristics were analyzed for the first 50 videos of each string. Seventy-seven eligible videos were identified as a result. The mean Journal of the American Medical Association score was 2.25 ± 1.09 (range: 0-4) out of 4. The mean Global Quality Score (GQS) score was 2.29 ± 1.37 (range: 1-4) out of 5. The mean LBP score (LPS) score was 3.83 ± 2.23 (range: 0-11) out of 15. Video power index was a predictor of GQS score (β = 55.78, p = 0.048), whereas the number of likes (β = -2.49, p = 0.047) and view ratio (β = -55.62, p = 0.049) were associated with lower quality scores. Days since initial upload (β = 0.32, p = 0.042) as well as like ratio (β = 0.37, p = 0.019) were independent predictors of higher LPS scores. The results of this study suggest that the overall reliability and educational quality of videos uploaded to YouTube concerning LBP are unsatisfactory. More popular videos demonstrated poorer educational quality than their less popular counterparts. As the prevalence of LBP rises, more accurate and thorough educational videos are necessary to ensure accurate information is available to patients.
Substances chimiques
Lipopolysaccharides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
901-908Informations de copyright
© 2021 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Ricci JA, Stewart WF, Chee E, Leotta C, Foley K, Hochberg MC. Back pain exacerbations and lost productive time costs in United States workers. Spine. 2006;31(26):3052-3060.
Waddell G, Burton AK. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review. Occup Med. 2001;51(2):124-135.
Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, et al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(6):968-974.
Chou R, Atlas SJ, Stanos SP, Rosenquist RW. Nonsurgical interventional therapies for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society clinical practice guideline. Spine. 2009;34(10):1078-1093.
Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356-2367.
Buchbinder R, van Tulder M, Öberg B, et al. Low back pain: a call for action. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2384-2388.
Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 2008;8(1):8-20.
Brooks FM, Lawrence H, Jones A, McCarthy MJH. YouTube™ as a source of patient information for lumbar discectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96(2):144-146.
White MD, Latour K, Giordano M, Taylor T, Agarwal N. Reliability and quality of online patient education videos for lateral lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020:33 1-6.
Ovenden CD, Brooks FM. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion YouTube Videos as a source of patient education. Asian Spine J. 2018;12(6):987-991.
Kunze KN, Krivicich LM, Verma NN, Chahla J. Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for the meniscus: a YouTube-based quality-control study. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(1):233-238.
Erdem MN, Karaca S. Evaluating the accuracy and quality of the information in Kyphosis Videos shared on YouTube. Spine. 2018;43(22):E1334-E1339.
Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5(3):e17.
Kunze KN, Cohn MR, Wakefield C, et al. YouTube as a source of information about the posterior cruciate ligament: a content-quality and reliability analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019;1(2):e109-e114.
Szmuda T, Ali S, Słoniewski P. Letter to the Editor regarding “A Quality Analysis of Disk Herniation Videos on YouTube”. World Neurosurg. 2019;130:570-572.
Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis-A wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899-903.
Qi J, Trang T, Doong J, Kang S, Chien AL. Misinformation is prevalent in psoriasis-related YouTube videos. Dermatol Online J. 2016;22:11.
Low Back Pain. https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/diseases--conditions/low-back-pain/. Accessed April 26, 2021.
Wong M, Desai B, Bautista M, Kwon O, Kolodychuk N, Chimento G. YouTube is a poor source of patient information for knee arthroplasty and knee osteoarthritis. Arthroplast Today. 2019;5(1):78-82.
Staunton PF, Baker JF, Green J, Devitt A. Online curves: a quality analysis of scoliosis videos on YouTube. Spine. 2015;40(23):1857-1861.
Addar A, Marwan Y, Algarni N, Berry G. Assessment of “YouTube” content for distal radius fracture immobilization. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(5):799-804.
Shepard N, Cho W. Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a review. global. Spine J. 2019;9(2):202-209.
Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz K-D, Windhager R. YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop. 2016;40(10):1995-2002.
Akpolat AO, Kurdal DP. Is quality of YouTube content on Bankart lesion and its surgical treatment adequate? J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):78.
Kuru T, Erken HY. Evaluation of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on rotator cuff tears. Cureus. 2020;12(2):e6852.
Haslam K, Doucette H, Hachey S, et al. YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public: an integrative review. Can J Dent Hyg. 2019;53(1):53-66.
Ng MK, Emara AK, Molloy RM, Krebs VE, Mont M, Piuzzi NS. YouTube as a source of patient information for total knee/hip arthroplasty: quantitative analysis of video reliability, quality, and content. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020.1-11.
Desai T, Shariff A, Dhingra V, Minhas D, Eure M, Kats M. Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):82469.
Kunze KN. Editorial commentary: YouTube videos provide poor-quality medical information: don't believe what you watch!. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:3048-3049.
UpToDate. https://www-uptodate-com.ezproxy.rush.edu/contents/search. 2021. Accessed April 26, 2021.
Orthobullets. https://www.orthobullets.com/. 2021. Accessed April 26, 2021.
iProspect, Jupiter Research. Search engine user behaviour study. DOCUMENT. 2006.