Integration Activities Between Hospitals and Skilled Nursing Facilities: A National Survey.


Journal

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
ISSN: 1538-9375
Titre abrégé: J Am Med Dir Assoc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100893243

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
received: 06 03 2021
revised: 22 04 2021
accepted: 02 05 2021
pubmed: 2 6 2021
medline: 8 1 2022
entrez: 1 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Increasing recognition of the adverse events older adults experience in post-acute care in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) has led to multiple efforts to improve care integration between hospitals and SNFs. We sought to measure current care integration activities between hospitals and SNFs. Cross-sectional survey. A total of 500 randomly selected Medicare-certified SNFs in the United States in 2019. The survey inquired about 12 care integration activities with the 2 highest volume referring hospitals for each SNF. We collapsed survey responses into 5 categories of integration based on high correlations between the individual measures. These were: (1) formal integration (co-location or co-ownership); (2) informal integration (eg, formal affiliation, participation in SNF collaborative, shared pay for performance, or clinical leadership meetings between hospital and SNF); (3) shared quality/safety activities (eg, initiatives to improve medication safety or reduce hospital admission); (4) shared care coordinators; and/or (5) shared supervising clinicians. We then conducted multivariate regressions to examine associations between different care integration activities and hospital/SNF characteristics. Our overall response rate was 53.0%, including 265 SNFs that represented 487 SNF-hospital pairs. Informal integration was most common (in 53.3% of pairs), whereas shared clinicians (43.0%), care coordinators (36.5%), shared quality/safety activities (35.1%), and formal integration (7.4%) were present in a minority. Hospital-SNF pairs had lower odds of being formally integrated if the SNF was for-profit compared with not-for-profit [odds ratio (OR) 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03-0.42, adjusted P = .04)] and higher odds of sharing quality improvement activities in metropolitan rather than rural areas (OR 4.06, 95% CI 1.80-9.17, adjusted P = .02) and in the Midwest compared with West (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.44-6.06, adjusted P = .049). These findings raise important questions about what is driving variability in hospital-SNF integration activities, and which activities may be most effective for improving transitional care outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34062148
pii: S1525-8610(21)00469-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.05.005
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2565-2570.e4

Informations de copyright

Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Robert E Burke (RE)

Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: Robert.Burke2@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Jessica Phelan (J)

Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy, Boston, MA, USA.

Dori Cross (D)

University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Rachel M Werner (RM)

Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Julia Adler-Milstein (J)

University of California San Francisco, Department of Medicine and Center for Clinical Informatics and Improvement Research, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH