Quantitative Investigation of Irinotecan Metabolism, Transport, and Gut Microbiome Activation.
Antineoplastic Agents
/ pharmacokinetics
Carboxylesterase
/ metabolism
Cell Line, Tumor
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Enzyme Activation
/ drug effects
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
/ drug effects
Glucuronidase
/ metabolism
Hepatobiliary Elimination
/ drug effects
Humans
Inactivation, Metabolic
/ drug effects
Irinotecan
/ analogs & derivatives
Liver
/ enzymology
Organic Anion Transporters
/ metabolism
Topoisomerase I Inhibitors
/ pharmacokinetics
Journal
Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals
ISSN: 1521-009X
Titre abrégé: Drug Metab Dispos
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9421550
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
received:
21
03
2021
accepted:
24
05
2021
pubmed:
3
6
2021
medline:
24
3
2022
entrez:
2
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The anticancer drug irinotecan shows serious dose-limiting gastrointestinal toxicity regardless of intravenous dosing. Although enzymes and transporters involved in irinotecan disposition are known, quantitative contributions of these mechanisms in complex in vivo disposition of irinotecan are poorly understood. We explained intestinal disposition and toxicity of irinotecan by integrating 1) in vitro metabolism and transport data of irinotecan and its metabolites, 2) ex vivo gut microbial activation of the toxic metabolite SN-38, and 3) the tissue protein abundance data of enzymes and transporters relevant to irinotecan and its metabolites. Integration of in vitro kinetics data with the tissue enzyme and transporter abundance predicted that carboxylesterase (CES)-mediated hydrolysis of irinotecan is the rate-limiting process in the liver, where the toxic metabolite formed is rapidly deactivated by glucuronidation. In contrast, the poor SN-38 glucuronidation rate as compared with its efficient formation by CES2 in the enterocytes is the key mechanism of the intestinal accumulation of the toxic metabolite. The biliary efflux and organic anion transporting polypeptide-2B1-mediated enterocyte uptake can also synergize buildup of SN-38 in the enterocytes, whereas intestinal P-glycoprotein likely facilitates SN-38 detoxification in the enterocytes. The higher SN-38 concentration in the intestine can be further nourished by β-d-glucuronidases. Understanding the quantitative significance of the key metabolism and transport processes of irinotecan and its metabolites can be leveraged to alleviate its intestinal side effects. Further, the proteomics-informed quantitative approach to determine intracellular disposition can be extended to determine susceptibility of cancer cells over normal cells for precision irinotecan therapy. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This work provides a deeper insight into the quantitative relevance of irinotecan hydrolysis (activation), conjugation (deactivation), and deconjugation (reactivation) by human or gut microbial enzymes or transporters. The results of this study explain the characteristic intestinal exposure and toxicity of irinotecan. The quantitative tissue-specific in vitro to in vivo extrapolation approach presented in this study can be extended to cancer cells.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34074730
pii: dmd.121.000476
doi: 10.1124/dmd.121.000476
pmc: PMC8407663
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Organic Anion Transporters
0
Topoisomerase I Inhibitors
0
Irinotecan
7673326042
Carboxylesterase
EC 3.1.1.1
Glucuronidase
EC 3.2.1.31
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
683-693Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA207416
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM137286
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD081299
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
Références
Science. 2015 Jan 23;347(6220):1260419
pubmed: 25613900
Genet Med. 2009 Jan;11(1):21-34
pubmed: 19125129
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Sep;14(9):890-900
pubmed: 16604351
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Sep 1;10(17):5889-94
pubmed: 15355921
Drug Metab Dispos. 2002 Dec;30(12):1446-54
pubmed: 12433818
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Nov 3;96(21):1585-92
pubmed: 15523087
Cancer Lett. 2008 Feb 18;260(1-2):163-9
pubmed: 18082941
Drug Metab Dispos. 2010 Dec;38(12):2210-7
pubmed: 20823294
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001 Nov 9;288(4):827-32
pubmed: 11688982
Toxicol Sci. 2019 May 1;169(1):272-279
pubmed: 30726989
Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Oct;6(10):789-802
pubmed: 16990856
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 31;117(13):7374-7381
pubmed: 32170007
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Apr;59(4):415-24
pubmed: 15801936
Saudi Pharm J. 2019 Dec;27(8):1146-1156
pubmed: 31885474
Pharmacogenomics J. 2002;2(1):43-7
pubmed: 11990381
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016;12(1):31-40
pubmed: 26569070
Cancer Res. 2000 Mar 1;60(5):1189-92
pubmed: 10728672
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 1;32(22):2328-34
pubmed: 24958824
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):E6231-E6239
pubmed: 28701380
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004 Aug;3(8):711-5
pubmed: 15286737
Drug Metab Dispos. 2014 Jan;42(1):78-88
pubmed: 24122874
ACS Cent Sci. 2018 Jul 25;4(7):868-879
pubmed: 30062115
Drug Metab Dispos. 2015 Feb;43(2):235-47
pubmed: 25414411
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Feb 1;11(3):1226-36
pubmed: 15709193
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012 Dec;343(3):696-703
pubmed: 22984227
Drug Metab Dispos. 2016 Jan;44(1):1-7
pubmed: 26526067
ACS Chem Biol. 2020 Jan 17;15(1):217-225
pubmed: 31774274
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011 Jan;67(1):231-6
pubmed: 20680278
Br J Cancer. 2012 Jan 3;106(1):18-24
pubmed: 22108516
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2012 Mar 25;62:140-8
pubmed: 22305081
Mol Pharmacol. 2020 Sep;98(3):234-242
pubmed: 32587096
Cancer Res. 2000 Dec 15;60(24):6921-6
pubmed: 11156391
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2019 Jul;191:105350
pubmed: 30959153
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Jan;32(1):40-51
pubmed: 24406927
Toxicol In Vitro. 2015 Feb;29(1):251-8
pubmed: 25448811
Mol Pharm. 2020 Nov 2;17(11):4114-4124
pubmed: 32955894
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Nov;76(5):490-502
pubmed: 15536463
Curr Drug Metab. 2019;20(2):91-102
pubmed: 30129408
Cancer. 2008 May 1;112(9):1932-40
pubmed: 18300238
Cancer Biol Ther. 2011 Nov 1;12(9):780-7
pubmed: 21892003
Br J Cancer. 2015 Mar 3;112(5):857-65
pubmed: 25611302
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015 Jul;14(7):475-86
pubmed: 26091267
Drug Metab Dispos. 2005 Mar;33(3):434-9
pubmed: 15608127
Drug Metab Dispos. 2003 Jan;31(1):108-13
pubmed: 12485959
Pharmacol Ther. 1995;68(2):269-96
pubmed: 8719971
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;7(4):221-41
pubmed: 25950758
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Nov;104(5):865-889
pubmed: 30059145
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2013;229(2):107-14
pubmed: 23303296
Pharmacol Rev. 2013 Dec 31;66(1):334-95
pubmed: 24381236
BMC Med. 2004 May 04;2:16
pubmed: 15125776
Drug Metab Dispos. 2000 Apr;28(4):423-33
pubmed: 10725311
Xenobiotica. 2001 Oct;31(10):687-99
pubmed: 11695848
Biochem Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;156:32-42
pubmed: 30086285
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Aug;106(2):317-328
pubmed: 30937887
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 19;110(47):19143-8
pubmed: 24191041
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2017 Nov;363(2):265-274
pubmed: 28819071
J Thorac Oncol. 2006 Mar;1(3):226-30
pubmed: 17409861