A qualitative study of what care workers do to provide patient safety at home through telecare.

Care work Home care practice Invisible work Safety work Social alarm Telecare Welfare technology

Journal

BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 27 11 2020
accepted: 17 05 2021
entrez: 6 6 2021
pubmed: 7 6 2021
medline: 9 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In health care, the work of keeping the patient safe and reducing the risk of harm is defined as safety work. In our digitised and technology-rich era, safety work usually involves a relationship between people and technologies. Telecare is one of the fastest-growing technology-domains in western health care systems. In the marketing of telecare, the expectation is that safety is implicit simply by the presence of technology in patients' homes. Whilst both researchers and health authorities are concerned with developing cost-benefit analyses and measuring effects, there is a lack of attention to the daily work needed to ensure that technologies contribute to patient safety. This paper aims to describe how patient safety in home care is addressed through and with telecare. We base our exploration on the social alarm, an established technology that care workers are expected to handle as an integrated part of their ordinary work. The study has a qualitative explorative design where we draw on empirical data from three case studies, involving five Norwegian municipalities that use social alarm systems in home care services. We analyse observations of practice and interviews with the actors involved, following King's outline of template analysis. We identified three co-existing work processes that contributed to patient safety: "Aligning people and technologies"; "Being alert and staying calm"; and "Coordinating activities based on people and technology". Attention to these work processes exposes safety practices, and how safety is constructed in relational practices involving multiple people and technologies. We conclude that the three work processes identified are essential if the safety alarm is to function for the end user's safety. The safety of home-dwelling patients is reliant on the person-technology interface. The efforts of care workers and their interface with technology are a central feature of creating safety in a patient's home, and in doing so, they utilise a repertoire of skills and knowledge.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In health care, the work of keeping the patient safe and reducing the risk of harm is defined as safety work. In our digitised and technology-rich era, safety work usually involves a relationship between people and technologies. Telecare is one of the fastest-growing technology-domains in western health care systems. In the marketing of telecare, the expectation is that safety is implicit simply by the presence of technology in patients' homes. Whilst both researchers and health authorities are concerned with developing cost-benefit analyses and measuring effects, there is a lack of attention to the daily work needed to ensure that technologies contribute to patient safety. This paper aims to describe how patient safety in home care is addressed through and with telecare. We base our exploration on the social alarm, an established technology that care workers are expected to handle as an integrated part of their ordinary work.
METHODS METHODS
The study has a qualitative explorative design where we draw on empirical data from three case studies, involving five Norwegian municipalities that use social alarm systems in home care services. We analyse observations of practice and interviews with the actors involved, following King's outline of template analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified three co-existing work processes that contributed to patient safety: "Aligning people and technologies"; "Being alert and staying calm"; and "Coordinating activities based on people and technology". Attention to these work processes exposes safety practices, and how safety is constructed in relational practices involving multiple people and technologies.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that the three work processes identified are essential if the safety alarm is to function for the end user's safety. The safety of home-dwelling patients is reliant on the person-technology interface. The efforts of care workers and their interface with technology are a central feature of creating safety in a patient's home, and in doing so, they utilise a repertoire of skills and knowledge.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34090450
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06556-4
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06556-4
pmc: PMC8180066
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

553

Références

Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Jan;9(1):79-87
pubmed: 23919407
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 15;17(1):657
pubmed: 28915809
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2010 Aug;43(4):219-23
pubmed: 20814795
Nurs Open. 2019 Jul 01;6(3):1254-1261
pubmed: 31367452
BMJ. 2001 Sep 15;323(7313):583-4
pubmed: 11557689
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 23;13:91
pubmed: 25902803
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 25;14:588
pubmed: 25421823
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 19;16:137
pubmed: 27095102
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 14;18(7):e187
pubmed: 27417422
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 30;19(1):104
pubmed: 29960590
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Winter;24(1):120-4
pubmed: 18218177
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629
pubmed: 15595944
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 19;20(10):e10054
pubmed: 30341049
Nurs Philos. 2017 Jan;18(1):
pubmed: 27758077
BMJ Open. 2012 Jul 19;2(4):
pubmed: 22815469
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 3;20(1):277
pubmed: 32245450
Sociol Health Illn. 2003;25:75-96
pubmed: 14498931
Aging Ment Health. 2007 Sep;11(5):477-84
pubmed: 17882585

Auteurs

Randi Stokke (R)

Centre for Care Research, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway. Randi.stokke@ntnu.no.

Line Melby (L)

Centre for Care Research, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway.

Jørn Isaksen (J)

Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Gudbrandsdalsvegen 350, 2624, Lillehammer, Norway.

Aud Obstfelder (A)

Centre for Care Research, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway.

Hege Andreassen (H)

Centre for Care Research, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway.
Centre for Women and Gender Research, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, P.O Box 6050 Langnes, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH