Molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in Thailand, 2016-2018.
Journal
Antimicrobial resistance and infection control
ISSN: 2047-2994
Titre abrégé: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 06 2021
05 06 2021
Historique:
received:
16
02
2021
accepted:
17
05
2021
entrez:
6
6
2021
pubmed:
7
6
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is a global threat. Enterobacterales develops carbapenem resistance through several mechanisms, including the production of carbapenemases. We aim to describe the prevalence of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) with and without carbapenemase production and distribution of carbapenemase-producing (CP) genes in Thailand using 2016-2018 data from a national antimicrobial resistance surveillance system developed by the Thailand National Institute of Health (NIH). CRE was defined as any Enterobacterales resistant to ertapenem, imipenem, or meropenem. Starting in 2016, 25 tertiary care hospitals from the five regions of Thailand submitted the first CRE isolate from each specimen type and patient admission to Thailand NIH, accompanied by a case report form with patient information. NIH performed confirmatory identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing and performed multiplex polymerase chain reaction testing to detect CP-genes. Using 2016-2018 data, we calculated proportions of CP-CRE, stratified by specimen type, organism, and CP-gene using SAS 9.4. Overall, 4,296 presumed CRE isolates were submitted to Thailand NIH; 3,946 (93%) were confirmed CRE. Urine (n = 1622, 41%) and sputum (n = 1380, 35%) were the most common specimen types, while blood only accounted for 323 (8%) CRE isolates. The most common organism was Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 2660, 72%), followed by Escherichia coli (n = 799, 22%). The proportion of CP-CRE was high for all organism types (range: 85-98%). Of all CRE isolates, 2909 (80%) had one CP-gene and 629 (17%) had > 1 CP-gene. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) was the most common CP-gene, present in 2392 (65%) CRE isolates. K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) genes were not detected among any isolates. CP genes were found in a high proportion (97%) of CRE isolates from hospitals across Thailand. The prevalence of NDM and OXA-48-like genes in Thailand is consistent with pattern seen in Southeast Asia, but different from that in the United States and other regions. As carbapenemase testing is not routinely performed in Thailand, hospital staff should consider treating all patients with CRE with enhanced infection control measures; in line with CDC recommendation for enhanced infection control measures for CP-CRE because of their high propensity to spread.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is a global threat. Enterobacterales develops carbapenem resistance through several mechanisms, including the production of carbapenemases. We aim to describe the prevalence of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) with and without carbapenemase production and distribution of carbapenemase-producing (CP) genes in Thailand using 2016-2018 data from a national antimicrobial resistance surveillance system developed by the Thailand National Institute of Health (NIH).
METHODS
CRE was defined as any Enterobacterales resistant to ertapenem, imipenem, or meropenem. Starting in 2016, 25 tertiary care hospitals from the five regions of Thailand submitted the first CRE isolate from each specimen type and patient admission to Thailand NIH, accompanied by a case report form with patient information. NIH performed confirmatory identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing and performed multiplex polymerase chain reaction testing to detect CP-genes. Using 2016-2018 data, we calculated proportions of CP-CRE, stratified by specimen type, organism, and CP-gene using SAS 9.4.
RESULTS
Overall, 4,296 presumed CRE isolates were submitted to Thailand NIH; 3,946 (93%) were confirmed CRE. Urine (n = 1622, 41%) and sputum (n = 1380, 35%) were the most common specimen types, while blood only accounted for 323 (8%) CRE isolates. The most common organism was Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 2660, 72%), followed by Escherichia coli (n = 799, 22%). The proportion of CP-CRE was high for all organism types (range: 85-98%). Of all CRE isolates, 2909 (80%) had one CP-gene and 629 (17%) had > 1 CP-gene. New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) was the most common CP-gene, present in 2392 (65%) CRE isolates. K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) and Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) genes were not detected among any isolates.
CONCLUSION
CP genes were found in a high proportion (97%) of CRE isolates from hospitals across Thailand. The prevalence of NDM and OXA-48-like genes in Thailand is consistent with pattern seen in Southeast Asia, but different from that in the United States and other regions. As carbapenemase testing is not routinely performed in Thailand, hospital staff should consider treating all patients with CRE with enhanced infection control measures; in line with CDC recommendation for enhanced infection control measures for CP-CRE because of their high propensity to spread.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34090537
doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-00950-7
pii: 10.1186/s13756-021-00950-7
pmc: PMC8180034
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbapenems
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
88Références
J Infect. 2015 Jun;70(6):592-9
pubmed: 25447713
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Sep 23;60(10):6425-9
pubmed: 27503655
Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;17(10):1791-8
pubmed: 22000347
N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1804-13
pubmed: 20463340
BMC Med. 2018 Jun 4;16(1):78
pubmed: 29860943
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Jul 1;93(7):439
pubmed: 26170498
Virulence. 2017 May 19;8(4):460-469
pubmed: 27593176
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Mar;90(3):395-403
pubmed: 25744116
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007 Apr;29(4):456-9
pubmed: 17293088
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:249856
pubmed: 24790993
J Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 15;215(suppl_1):S28-S36
pubmed: 28375512
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Mar;54(3):529-34
pubmed: 26739152
Infection. 2020 Dec;48(6):835-851
pubmed: 32875545
Elife. 2016 Sep 06;5:
pubmed: 27599374
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Apr 27;17(1):101
pubmed: 28449650
Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Feb 20;12:461-468
pubmed: 30863128
Health Secur. 2015 May-Jun;13(3):153-5
pubmed: 26042858
Virulence. 2017 May 19;8(4):403-416
pubmed: 27384881
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2019 Aug - Sep;37(7):454-457
pubmed: 30857832
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Aug;55(8):2321-2333
pubmed: 28381609
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 May;70(1):119-23
pubmed: 21398074
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2015 Jun 23;4:26
pubmed: 26106476
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Jun;83:140-146
pubmed: 29705624
J Med Assoc Thai. 2017 Feb;100 Suppl 1:S212-21
pubmed: 29927568
J Infect Chemother. 2014 May;20(5):293-7
pubmed: 24703709
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 1;64(3):257-264
pubmed: 28013264
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 17;7(8):ofaa299
pubmed: 32855986
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Apr 06;67(13):396-401
pubmed: 29621209
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 1;72(11):1871-1878
pubmed: 32427286
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Sep;66(9):1992-7
pubmed: 21676902
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Oct;35(10):1679-89
pubmed: 27401905
Microb Drug Resist. 2018 Sep;24(7):1006-1011
pubmed: 29782216