Short-term Outcomes After Spleen-preserving Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy With or Without Preservation of Splenic Vessels: A Pan-European Retrospective Study in High-volume Centers.
Journal
Annals of surgery
ISSN: 1528-1140
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372354
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jan 2023
01 Jan 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
7
6
2021
medline:
3
3
2023
entrez:
6
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare short-term clinical outcomes after Kimura and Warshaw MIDP. Spleen preservation during distal pancreatectomy can be achieved by either preservation (Kimura) or resection (Warshaw) of the splenic vessels. Multicenter studies reporting outcomes of Kimura and Warshaw spleen-preserving MIDP are scarce. Multicenter retrospective study including consecutive MIDP procedures intended to be spleen-preserving from 29 high-volume centers (≥15 distal pancreatectomies annually) in 8 European countries. Primary outcomes were secondary splenectomy for ischemia and major (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) complications. Sensitivity analysis assessed the impact of excluding ("rescue") Warshaw procedures which were performed in centers that typically (>75%) performed Kimura MIDP. Overall, 1095 patients after MIDP were included with successful splenic preservation in 878 patients (80%), including 634 Kimura and 244 Warshaw procedures. Rates of clinically relevant splenic ischemia (0.6% vs 1.6%, P = 0.127) and major complications (11.5% vs 14.4%, P = 0.308) did not differ significantly between Kimura and Warshaw MIDP, respectively. Mortality rates were higher after Warshaw MIDP (0.0% vs 1.2%, P = 0.023), and decreased in the sensitivity analysis (0.0% vs 0.6%, P = 0.052). Kimura MIDP was associated with longer operative time (202 vs 184 minutes, P = 0.033) and less blood loss (100 vs 150 mL, P < 0.001) as compared to Warshaw MIDP. Unplanned splenectomy was associated with a higher conversion rate (20.7% vs 5.0%, P < 0.001). Kimura and Warshaw spleen-preserving MIDP provide equivalent short-term outcomes with low rates of secondary splenectomy and postoperative morbidity. Further analyses of long-term outcomes are needed.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To compare short-term clinical outcomes after Kimura and Warshaw MIDP.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Spleen preservation during distal pancreatectomy can be achieved by either preservation (Kimura) or resection (Warshaw) of the splenic vessels. Multicenter studies reporting outcomes of Kimura and Warshaw spleen-preserving MIDP are scarce.
METHODS
METHODS
Multicenter retrospective study including consecutive MIDP procedures intended to be spleen-preserving from 29 high-volume centers (≥15 distal pancreatectomies annually) in 8 European countries. Primary outcomes were secondary splenectomy for ischemia and major (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) complications. Sensitivity analysis assessed the impact of excluding ("rescue") Warshaw procedures which were performed in centers that typically (>75%) performed Kimura MIDP.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 1095 patients after MIDP were included with successful splenic preservation in 878 patients (80%), including 634 Kimura and 244 Warshaw procedures. Rates of clinically relevant splenic ischemia (0.6% vs 1.6%, P = 0.127) and major complications (11.5% vs 14.4%, P = 0.308) did not differ significantly between Kimura and Warshaw MIDP, respectively. Mortality rates were higher after Warshaw MIDP (0.0% vs 1.2%, P = 0.023), and decreased in the sensitivity analysis (0.0% vs 0.6%, P = 0.052). Kimura MIDP was associated with longer operative time (202 vs 184 minutes, P = 0.033) and less blood loss (100 vs 150 mL, P < 0.001) as compared to Warshaw MIDP. Unplanned splenectomy was associated with a higher conversion rate (20.7% vs 5.0%, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Kimura and Warshaw spleen-preserving MIDP provide equivalent short-term outcomes with low rates of secondary splenectomy and postoperative morbidity. Further analyses of long-term outcomes are needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34091515
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004963
pii: 00000658-900000000-93532
doi:
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e119-e125Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, et al. The Miami International evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg. 2020;271:1–14.
Bjornsson B, Larsson AL, Hjalmarsson C, et al. Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg. 2020;107:1281–1288.
de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269:2–9.
Casciani F, Trudeau MT, Vollmer CM Jr. Perioperative immunization for splenectomy and the surgeon’s responsibility: a review. JAMA Surg. 2020;155:1068–1077.
Finnegan OC, Hawkey PM. Overwhelming post-splenectomy infection with group B Streptococcus. Postgrad Med J. 1981;57:202–203.
Likhite VV. Immunological impairment and susceptibility to infection after splenectomy. JAMA. 1976;236:1376–1377.
Taniguchi LU, Correia MD, Zampieri FG. Overwhelming post-splenectomy infection: narrative review of the literature. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014;15:686–693.
Kristinsson SY, Gridley G, Hoover RN, et al. Long-term risks after splenectomy among 8,149 cancer-free American veterans: a cohort study with up to 27 years follow-up. Haematologica. 2014;99:392–398.
Kimura W, Fuse A, Hirai I, et al. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the splenic artery and vein for intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor (IPMT): three interesting cases. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50:2242–2245.
Maggino L. 958 - Splenectomy During Distal Pancreatectomy: What are we Really Doing? SSAT Abstracts 2018 2018.
Warshaw AL. Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 1988;123:550–553.
Sutherland DE, Najarian JS. Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 1988;123:1525.
Elabbasy F, Gadde R, Hanna MM, et al. Minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: does splenic vessel preservation have better postoperative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2015;14:346–353.
Hou B, Xiong D, Chen S, et al. Splenic vessel preservation versus splenic vessel resection in laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88:E532–E538.
Jain G, Chakravartty S, Patel AG. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with and without splenic vessel ligation: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15:403–410.
Li BQ, Qiao YX, Li J, et al. Preservation or ligation of splenic vessels during spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis. J Invest Surg. 2019;32:654–669.
Partelli S, Cirocchi R, Randolph J, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with preservation or ligation of the splenic artery and vein. Surgeon. 2016;14:109–118.
Song J, He Z, Ma S, et al. Clinical comparison of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with or without splenic vessel preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;29:323–332.
Sun N, Lu G, Zhang L, et al. Clinical efficacy of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with or without splenic vessel preservation: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e8600.
Tang Y, Tang S, Hu S. The efficacy of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with or without splenic vessel preservation: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:17128–17139.
Yongfei H, Javed AA, Burkhart R, et al. Geographical variation and trends in outcomes of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with or without splenic vessel preservation: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017;45:47–55.
Yu X, Li H, Jin C, et al. Splenic vessel preservation versus Warshaw’s technique during spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400:183–191.
Paiella S, De Pastena M, Korrel M, et al. Long term outcome after minimally invasive and open Warshaw and Kimura techniques for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: international multicenter retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45:1668–1673.
Esposito A, Casetti L, De Pastena M, et al. Robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: the Verona experience. Updates Surg. 2021;73:923–928.
Lof S, Korrel M, van Hilst J, et al. Outcomes of elective and emergency conversion in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an international multicenter propensity score-matched study. Ann Surg. 2021;274:e1001–e1007.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213.
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8–13.
Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007;142:761–768.
Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142:20–25.
Dai MH, Shi N, Xing C, et al. Splenic preservation in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 2017;104:452–462.
Mekeel KL, Moss AA, Reddy KS, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: does splenic preservation affect outcomes? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011;21:362–365.
Tang CW, Feng WM, Bao Y, et al. Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy or distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy?: perioperative and patient-reported outcome analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48:e62–e66.
Dokmak S. Medial or lateral approach for laparoscopic splenic vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy? Surgery. 2012;152:143–144.
Ferrone CR, Konstantinidis IT, Sahani DV, et al. Twenty-three years of the Warshaw operation for distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen. Ann Surg. 2011;253:1136–1139.
Shi N, Liu SL, Li YT, et al. Splenic preservation versus splenectomy during distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:365–374.
Tsiouris A, Cogan CM, Velanovich V. Distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: comparison of postoperative outcomes and surrogates of splenic function. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:738–744.
Moekotte AL, Lof S, White SA, et al. Splenic preservation versus splenectomy in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:1301–1309.
Zhao YP, Du X, Dai MH, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: spleen-preservation does not increase morbidity. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2012;11:536–541.