A realist evaluation exploring simulated patient role-play in pharmacist undergraduate communication training.

Communication Interpersonal Communication Patient-pharmacist communication Pharmacist Pharmacy Education Pharmacy Student Realist Evaluation Realist Methods Simulated Patient Simulation

Journal

BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 12 01 2021
accepted: 07 05 2021
entrez: 7 6 2021
pubmed: 8 6 2021
medline: 9 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Effective communication between pharmacists and patients is essential and improves health outcomes. Simulated patients (SPs) are trained to reproduce real-life situations and can help pharmacy students to develop and adapt their communication skills in a safe, learner-centred environment. The aim of this research was to explore how SP and pharmacy student role-play supports communication training. A mixed methods realist evaluation approach was adopted to test an initial theory relating to SP role-play for pharmacy students. The intervention tested involved complex communication cases in a men's and women's health module in year three of a new MPharm programme. This SP session was the first such session, of the programme which exclusively focused on complex communication skills for the students. Data collected comprised video-recordings of both training and mock OSCE sessions, and from student focus groups. Communication videos were scored using the Explanation and Planning Scale (EPSCALE) tool. Scores from SP and mock OSCE sessions were compared using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test. Focus groups were conducted with students about their experience of the training and analysed thematically, through a realist lens. Data was analysed for Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations to produce modified programme theories. Forty-six students (n = 46/59, 78 %) consented to their video-recorded interactions to be used. Students identified contextual factors relating to the timing within the course and the setting of the intervention, the debrief and student individual contexts. Mechanisms included authenticity, feedback, reflection, self-awareness and confidence. Negative responses included embarrassment and nervousness. They distinguished outcomes including increased awareness of communication style, more structured communication and increased comfort. However quantitative data showed a decrease (p < 0.001) in communication scores in the mock OSCE compared with scores from training sessions. Modified programme theories relating to SP training for pharmacy students were generated. SP role-play is a valuable communication skills training approach. Emphasis should be placed on multiple stakeholder feedback and promotion of reflection. Time limits need to be considered in this context and adjusted to meet student needs, especially for students with lower levels of communication comfort and those communicating in languages different to their first language.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Effective communication between pharmacists and patients is essential and improves health outcomes. Simulated patients (SPs) are trained to reproduce real-life situations and can help pharmacy students to develop and adapt their communication skills in a safe, learner-centred environment. The aim of this research was to explore how SP and pharmacy student role-play supports communication training.
METHODS METHODS
A mixed methods realist evaluation approach was adopted to test an initial theory relating to SP role-play for pharmacy students. The intervention tested involved complex communication cases in a men's and women's health module in year three of a new MPharm programme. This SP session was the first such session, of the programme which exclusively focused on complex communication skills for the students. Data collected comprised video-recordings of both training and mock OSCE sessions, and from student focus groups. Communication videos were scored using the Explanation and Planning Scale (EPSCALE) tool. Scores from SP and mock OSCE sessions were compared using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test. Focus groups were conducted with students about their experience of the training and analysed thematically, through a realist lens. Data was analysed for Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations to produce modified programme theories.
RESULTS RESULTS
Forty-six students (n = 46/59, 78 %) consented to their video-recorded interactions to be used. Students identified contextual factors relating to the timing within the course and the setting of the intervention, the debrief and student individual contexts. Mechanisms included authenticity, feedback, reflection, self-awareness and confidence. Negative responses included embarrassment and nervousness. They distinguished outcomes including increased awareness of communication style, more structured communication and increased comfort. However quantitative data showed a decrease (p < 0.001) in communication scores in the mock OSCE compared with scores from training sessions. Modified programme theories relating to SP training for pharmacy students were generated.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
SP role-play is a valuable communication skills training approach. Emphasis should be placed on multiple stakeholder feedback and promotion of reflection. Time limits need to be considered in this context and adjusted to meet student needs, especially for students with lower levels of communication comfort and those communicating in languages different to their first language.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34092216
doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02776-8
pii: 10.1186/s12909-021-02776-8
pmc: PMC8180382
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

325

Subventions

Organisme : Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
ID : 2103
Organisme : Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
ID : 2103
Organisme : Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
ID : 2103

Références

Med Educ. 2015 Jun;49(6):560-75
pubmed: 25989405
Med Teach. 2009 Jul;31(7):e316-22
pubmed: 19811140
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:21-34
pubmed: 16053581
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 May 25;80(4):65
pubmed: 27293232
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jan;82(1):89-93
pubmed: 20338713
Med Teach. 2003 May;25(3):250-4
pubmed: 12881045
Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Jun;18(3):141-8
pubmed: 20509347
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Apr;28(4):432-443
pubmed: 30714849
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Aug;23(3):633-652
pubmed: 28918571
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854
pubmed: 32356468
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Dec 1;59(23):2346-55
pubmed: 12489376
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Sep 25;11:69
pubmed: 21943295
Fam Pract. 2004 Oct;21(5):528-36
pubmed: 15367475
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Feb;78(2):143-8
pubmed: 19683890
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 Mar;16(1):131-42
pubmed: 20559868
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Feb 19;73(1):4
pubmed: 19513141
BMC Med Educ. 2005 Jul 19;5:28
pubmed: 16029509
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Oct 25;79(8):124
pubmed: 26690718
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jun;83(3):285-7
pubmed: 21641167
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Apr;11(4):394-401
pubmed: 31040015
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Mar 12;77(2):36
pubmed: 23519011
Simul Healthc. 2020 Feb;15(1):21-29
pubmed: 31743313
Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Jun 15;70(3):67
pubmed: 17136187
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 May;15(2):185-93
pubmed: 19757129
Med Teach. 1990;12(3-4):315-28
pubmed: 2095449
J Fam Pract. 2000 Sep;49(9):796-804
pubmed: 11032203
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jan 15;20(1):15
pubmed: 31941466
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Jun;11(6):603-608
pubmed: 31213316
Med Educ. 2017 Dec;51(12):1209-1219
pubmed: 28833360
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Mar;34(3):468-73
pubmed: 23683814
Med Educ. 2012 Jan;46(1):89-96
pubmed: 22150200
BMC Med. 2016 Jun 24;14(1):96
pubmed: 27342217
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Jun;33(6):677-83
pubmed: 22841362
Med Educ. 2011 Dec;45(12):1181-9
pubmed: 21988659
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Mar 9;:
pubmed: 33726988
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Jan;48:90-98
pubmed: 27741440
Eur J Dent Educ. 2009 Aug;13(3):147-53
pubmed: 19630933
Int J Pharm Pract. 2019 Jun;27(3):295-302
pubmed: 30648772
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Apr 15;72(2):35
pubmed: 18483601
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(11):2093-103
pubmed: 15047069
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 16;10:49
pubmed: 25885787
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 Mar;25(1):241-257
pubmed: 30715620
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2015 Apr-Jun;13(3):583
pubmed: 26445619
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jun;83(3):423-31
pubmed: 21640542
Teach Learn Med. 2006 Winter;18(1):42-7
pubmed: 16354139
Med Educ. 2016 Apr;50(4):376-9
pubmed: 26995470

Auteurs

Aisling Kerr (A)

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI School of Medicine and Health Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 1st floor Ardilaun House Block B, 111 St, Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. aislingkerr@rcsi.ie.

Judith Strawbridge (J)

School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI School of Medicine and Health Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 1st floor Ardilaun House Block B, 111 St, Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Caroline Kelleher (C)

Division of Population Health Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.

James Barlow (J)

Department of Chemistry, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Clare Sullivan (C)

Department of Simulation, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Teresa Pawlikowska (T)

Health Professions Education Centre (HPEC), RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH