Combined liver-kidney transplantation with positive crossmatch: Role of delayed kidney transplantation.


Journal

Surgery
ISSN: 1532-7361
Titre abrégé: Surgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0417347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2021
Historique:
received: 29 01 2021
revised: 13 04 2021
accepted: 10 05 2021
pubmed: 8 6 2021
medline: 26 11 2021
entrez: 7 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Positive crossmatch (XM+) combined liver-kidney transplantation due to preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies has produced mixed results. We sought to understand the role of delayed kidney transplant approach in XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations. XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations were retrospectively reviewed. T- and B-cell XM, complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch, and flow cytometric crossmatch were performed prospectively. Of 183 combined liver-kidney transplantations performed (2002-2019), 114 (62%) were with "delayed" kidney transplant approach and 19 (19 of 183, 10%) were XM+. Of 19 XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations, kidney transplant was "delayed" in 14 by an average of 47 hours (range 24-64 hours) from liver transplant. There was a significant reduction in both class I (mean pre-liver transplant mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) 26,230 versus mean post-liver transplant and pre-delayed kidney transplant MFI 3,272, P = .01) and total MFI (mean pre-liver transplant MFI 27,233 vs mean post liver transplant and predelayed kidney transplant MFI 11,469, P = .01). However, there was no significant change in the MFI of class II donor-specific antibodies (mean pre-liver transplant MFI 17,899 versus post-liver transplant and pre-delayed kidney transplant MFI 14,341, P = .19). None of XM+ delayed kidney transplants had delayed graft function, and there was no antibody-mediated rejection. One-year patient survival for the XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantation with delayed kidney transplant approach was 92.9%, which is comparable to patient survival of XM- combined liver-kidney transplantation. Whereas patient survival in recipients before "delayed" approach ("simultaneous"; n = 5) was 40% when liver-kidney transplants were performed simultaneously (P = .06). In sensitized combined liver-kidney transplantation recipients, the "delayed" kidney transplant approach is associated with a significant reduction in total and class I donor-specific antibodies after liver transplant before kidney transplant, enabling therapeutic interventions such as plasmapheresis, if needed, providing optimal outcomes similar to crossmatch recipients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Positive crossmatch (XM+) combined liver-kidney transplantation due to preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies has produced mixed results. We sought to understand the role of delayed kidney transplant approach in XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations.
METHODS
XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations were retrospectively reviewed. T- and B-cell XM, complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch, and flow cytometric crossmatch were performed prospectively.
RESULTS
Of 183 combined liver-kidney transplantations performed (2002-2019), 114 (62%) were with "delayed" kidney transplant approach and 19 (19 of 183, 10%) were XM+. Of 19 XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantations, kidney transplant was "delayed" in 14 by an average of 47 hours (range 24-64 hours) from liver transplant. There was a significant reduction in both class I (mean pre-liver transplant mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) 26,230 versus mean post-liver transplant and pre-delayed kidney transplant MFI 3,272, P = .01) and total MFI (mean pre-liver transplant MFI 27,233 vs mean post liver transplant and predelayed kidney transplant MFI 11,469, P = .01). However, there was no significant change in the MFI of class II donor-specific antibodies (mean pre-liver transplant MFI 17,899 versus post-liver transplant and pre-delayed kidney transplant MFI 14,341, P = .19). None of XM+ delayed kidney transplants had delayed graft function, and there was no antibody-mediated rejection. One-year patient survival for the XM+ combined liver-kidney transplantation with delayed kidney transplant approach was 92.9%, which is comparable to patient survival of XM- combined liver-kidney transplantation. Whereas patient survival in recipients before "delayed" approach ("simultaneous"; n = 5) was 40% when liver-kidney transplants were performed simultaneously (P = .06).
CONCLUSION
In sensitized combined liver-kidney transplantation recipients, the "delayed" kidney transplant approach is associated with a significant reduction in total and class I donor-specific antibodies after liver transplant before kidney transplant, enabling therapeutic interventions such as plasmapheresis, if needed, providing optimal outcomes similar to crossmatch recipients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34092375
pii: S0039-6060(21)00431-1
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.05.012
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

HLA Antigens 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1240-1247

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

William C Goggins (WC)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

Burcin Ekser (B)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/BurcinEkser.

Zachary Rokop (Z)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

Andrew J Lutz (AJ)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

Plamen Mihaylov (P)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

Richard S Mangus (RS)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/RichardMangusMD.

Jonathan A Fridell (JA)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/jonathanfridell.

John A Powelson (JA)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

Chandrashekhar A Kubal (CA)

Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. Electronic address: sakubal@iupui.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH