Factors associated with the development of re-tear following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A retrospective comparative study.
Journal
Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica
ISSN: 2589-1294
Titre abrégé: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 9424806
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
entrez:
8
6
2021
pubmed:
9
6
2021
medline:
20
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors for the development of re-tear following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair (aRCR). This retrospective clinical study included 196 consecutive aRCRs with a minimum 3-year follow-up. Pre- and postoperative clinical and functional outcomes were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), the University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale (UCLA), the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), and the Douleur Neuropathique (DN4) questzionnaire. The Goutallier staging of fatty infiltration, Occupational Ratio (OR), the Acromiohumeral Interval (AHI), Acromioclavicular Joint (ACJ) arthritis, acromion type, Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA), and tangent sign (tan- sign) were evaluated as radiological parameters. Different subgroup parameters were evaluated after dividing the patients into re-tear (-) and re-tear (+) groups, according to clinical and radiological outcomes as well as patient and intraoperative characteristics. The mean follow-up period was 72.0 ± 15.8 months. The mean age at the time of surgery was 58.4 ± 8.9 years. A significant improvement was found in clinical and functional scores in the re-tear (-) group (P < 0.001 for all). However, the retear (+) group had poorer outcome scores than the re-tear (-) group. Twenty patients (10.2%) had re-tear at the last follow-up. There was a significant difference between groups regarding pre-and postoperative clinical scores, with worse scores in the retear (+) group (P < 0.001 for all). Also, pre-and postoperative pseudoparalysis (P = 0.001 for both), acromioclavicular joint arthritis (ACJ) (P = 0.001), intraoperative rotator cuff wear (P = 0.007) or stiffness (P = 0.025), a longer time period between symptom onset and surgery (P = 0.031), larger tear size (P = 0.010), preoperative shoulder stiffness (P = 0.001), higher duration of postoperative analgesia use (P < 0.001), higher degrees of preoperative Occupational Ratio (OR) (P < 0.001), and higher degrees of fatty degeneration (P < 0.001) were found to be associated with re- tear development. Surgeons should consider the preoperative degree of fatty degeneration, clinical and functional scores, presence of ACJ arthritis, intraoperative tendon quality, tear size and chronicity as well as postoperative prolong analgesic requirement, and development of pseudoparalysis as factors regarding re-tear development risk following aRCR. Level IV, Therapeutic Study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34100361
doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2021.20091
pmc: PMC10566352
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Study
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
213-219Références
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Jul-Aug;8(4):351-4
pubmed: 10472009
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1254-60
pubmed: 17554104
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Jun;138(6):835-842
pubmed: 29594506
Arthroscopy. 2018 Mar;34(3):754-761
pubmed: 29100770
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):953-60
pubmed: 17473131
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2005 Dec;91(S8):31-42
pubmed: 16609552
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3463-3470
pubmed: 30383411
Pain. 2005 Mar;114(1-2):29-36
pubmed: 15733628
Arthroscopy. 2012 Jan;28(1):16-24
pubmed: 21982391
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Jan;(214):160-4
pubmed: 3791738
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Nov;53(6):414-419
pubmed: 31563430
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jun;27(6):1012-1020
pubmed: 29290609
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jun;22(6):e6-10
pubmed: 23352548
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):78-83
pubmed: 8020238
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):679-686
pubmed: 29253346
JBJS Rev. 2019 Apr;7(4):e1
pubmed: 30939497
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Aug;45(10):2336-2344
pubmed: 28534670
Arthroscopy. 2016 Oct;32(10):1947-1952
pubmed: 27129377
Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Dec;6(4):392-400
pubmed: 25436062
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Sep;53(5):356-359
pubmed: 30853399
JSES Open Access. 2018 Jan 08;2(1):60-68
pubmed: 30675569
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2099-107
pubmed: 21813440
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Nov-Dec;8(6):599-605
pubmed: 10633896
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Apr;82(4):505-15
pubmed: 10761941
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1413-20
pubmed: 21460068
Clin Sports Med. 1991 Oct;10(4):823-38
pubmed: 1934099
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Aug;28(8):1562-1567
pubmed: 31327395
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Sep;28(9):1647-1653
pubmed: 31326341
Arthroscopy. 2013 Mar;29(3):449-58
pubmed: 23312876
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Feb;26(2):241-245
pubmed: 27594085
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2386-92
pubmed: 26286879
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;32(5):1270-7
pubmed: 15262653
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7):860-866
pubmed: 31256664
Arthroscopy. 2016 Nov;32(11):2191-2200
pubmed: 27209624
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Apr;25(4):658-65
pubmed: 26589917
Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1121-1127
pubmed: 29273256