Frequency and phenotype of thalamic aphasia.
Aphasia
Language
Stroke
Thalamus
Journal
Journal of neurology
ISSN: 1432-1459
Titre abrégé: J Neurol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0423161
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
02
03
2021
accepted:
01
06
2021
revised:
28
05
2021
pubmed:
9
6
2021
medline:
11
1
2022
entrez:
8
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Aphasia is a recognized presenting symptom of thalamic lesions. Little is known regarding its frequency and phenotype. We examined the frequency of thalamic aphasia following Isolated Acute unilateral ischemic Lesions in the Thalamus (IALT) with respect to lesion location. Furthermore, we characterized thalamic aphasia according to affected language domains and severity. Fifty-two patients with IALT were analyzed [44% female, median age: 73 years (IQR: 60-79)]. Lesion location was determined using 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and categorized as anterior, posterior, paramedian or inferolateral. Standardized language assessment was performed using the validated Aphasia checklist (ACL) directly after symptom onset. Aphasia was defined as an ACL sum score of < 135 (range: 0-148). Of 52 patients, 23 (44%) fulfilled the ACL diagnostic criteria for aphasia, including nearly all lesion locations and both sides. The average ACL sum score was 132 ± 11 (range: 98-147). Aphasia was characterized by deficits within domains of complex understanding of speech and verbal fluency. Patients with left anterior IALT were most severely affected, having significantly lower ACL scores than all other patients (117 ± 13 vs. 135 ± 8; p < 0.001). In particular, aphasia in patients with left anterior IALT was characterized by significantly worse performance in the rating of verbal communication, verbal fluency, and naming (all p ≤ 0.001). Aphasia occurs in almost half of patients with focal thalamic lesions. Thalamic aphasia is not confined to one predefined thalamic lesion location, but language deficits are particularly pronounced in patients with left anterior IALT presenting with a distinct pattern.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Aphasia is a recognized presenting symptom of thalamic lesions. Little is known regarding its frequency and phenotype. We examined the frequency of thalamic aphasia following Isolated Acute unilateral ischemic Lesions in the Thalamus (IALT) with respect to lesion location. Furthermore, we characterized thalamic aphasia according to affected language domains and severity.
METHODS
METHODS
Fifty-two patients with IALT were analyzed [44% female, median age: 73 years (IQR: 60-79)]. Lesion location was determined using 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and categorized as anterior, posterior, paramedian or inferolateral. Standardized language assessment was performed using the validated Aphasia checklist (ACL) directly after symptom onset. Aphasia was defined as an ACL sum score of < 135 (range: 0-148).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 52 patients, 23 (44%) fulfilled the ACL diagnostic criteria for aphasia, including nearly all lesion locations and both sides. The average ACL sum score was 132 ± 11 (range: 98-147). Aphasia was characterized by deficits within domains of complex understanding of speech and verbal fluency. Patients with left anterior IALT were most severely affected, having significantly lower ACL scores than all other patients (117 ± 13 vs. 135 ± 8; p < 0.001). In particular, aphasia in patients with left anterior IALT was characterized by significantly worse performance in the rating of verbal communication, verbal fluency, and naming (all p ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Aphasia occurs in almost half of patients with focal thalamic lesions. Thalamic aphasia is not confined to one predefined thalamic lesion location, but language deficits are particularly pronounced in patients with left anterior IALT presenting with a distinct pattern.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34100990
doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10640-4
pii: 10.1007/s00415-021-10640-4
pmc: PMC8739316
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
368-376Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Crosson B (1985) Subcortical functions in language: a working model. Brain Lang 25:257–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934x(85)90085-9
doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(85)90085-9
pubmed: 3904918
Metter EJ, Riege WH, Hanson WR, Jackson CA, Kempler D, van Lancker D (1988) Subcortical structures in Aphasia. Arch Neurol 45:1229–1234. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1988.00520350067018
doi: 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520350067018
pubmed: 3263849
Schmahmann JD (2003) Vascular syndromes of the thalamus. Stroke 34(9):2264–2278. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000087786.38997.9E
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000087786.38997.9E
pubmed: 12933968
De Witte L, Brouns R, Kavadias D, Engelborghs S, De Deyn PP, Marien P (2011) Cognitive, affective and behavioural disturbances following vascular thalamic lesions: a review. Cortex 47(3):273–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.09.002
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.09.002
pubmed: 21111408
Osawa A, Maeshima S (2016) Aphasia and unilateral spatial neglect due to acute thalamic hemorrhage: clinical correlations and outcomes. Neurol Sci 37(4):565–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2476-2
doi: 10.1007/s10072-016-2476-2
pubmed: 26796359
Sodeyama N, Tamaki M, Sugishita M (1995) Persistent pure verbal amnesia and transient aphasia after left thalamic infarction. J Neurol 242(5):289–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00878870
doi: 10.1007/BF00878870
pubmed: 7643136
Fritsch M, Krause T, Klostermann F, Villringer K, Ihrke M, Nolte CH (2020) “Thalamic aphasia” after stroke is associated with left anterior lesion location. J Neurol 267(1):106–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09560-1
doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09560-1
pubmed: 31562559
Karussis D, Leker RR, Abramsky O (2000) Cognitive dysfunction following thalamic stroke: a study of 16 cases and review of the literature. J Neurol Sci 172:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00267-1
doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00267-1
pubmed: 10620656
Sebastian R, Schein MG, Davis C, Gomez Y, Newhart M, Oishi K, Hillis AE (2014) Aphasia or neglect after thalamic stroke: the various ways they may be related to cortical hypoperfusion. Front Neurol 5:231. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00231
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00231
pubmed: 25477859
pmcid: 4237053
Mori S, Sadoshima S, Ibayashi S, Fujishima M, Iino K (1995) Impact of thalamic hematoma on six-month mortality and motor and cognitive functional outcome. Stroke 26(4):620–626. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.4.620
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.26.4.620
pubmed: 7709409
Purdy M (2002) Executive function ability in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology 16(4–6):549–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030244000176
doi: 10.1080/02687030244000176
Kuljic-Obradovic DC (2003) Subcortical aphasia: three different language disorder syndromes? Eur J Neurol 10(4):445–448. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00604.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00604.x
pubmed: 12823499
Radanovic M, Scaff M (2003) Speech and language disturbances due to subcortical lesions. Brain Lang 84(3):337–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00554-0
doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00554-0
pubmed: 12662975
Nadeau SE, Crosson B (1997) Subcortical Aphasia. Brain Lang 58:355–402. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1707
doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1707
pubmed: 9222518
Crosson B (2013) Thalamic mechanisms in language: a reconsideration based on recent findings and concepts. Brain Lang 126(1):73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.06.011
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.06.011
pubmed: 22831779
Bogousslavsky J, Regli F, Uske A (1988) Thalamic infarcts: clinical syndromes, etiology and prognosis. Neurology 38:837–848. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.38.6.837
doi: 10.1212/wnl.38.6.837
pubmed: 3368064
Carrera E, Michel P, Bogousslavsky J (2004) Anteromedian, central, and posterolateral infarcts of the thalamus: three variant types. Stroke 35(12):2826–2831. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000147039.49252.2f
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000147039.49252.2f
pubmed: 15514194
Percheron G (1973) The anatomy of the arterial supply of the human thalamus and its use for the interpretation of the thalamic vascular pathology. Z Neurol 205(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00315956
doi: 10.1007/bf00315956
pubmed: 4126735
Kalbe E, Reinhold N, Brand M, Markowitsch HJ, Kessler J (2005) A new test battery to assess aphasic disturbances and associated cognitive dysfunctions—German normative data on the aphasia check list. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 27(7):779–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490918273
doi: 10.1080/13803390490918273
pubmed: 16183613
Cohen JA, Gelfer CE, Sweet RD (1980) Thalamic infarction producing aphasia. Mt Sinai J Med 47(4):398–404
pubmed: 6157982
Whelan B-M, Murdoch BE, Theodoros DG, Silburn P, Hall B (2002) A role for the dominant thalamus in language? A linguistic comparison of two cases subsequent to unilateral thalamotomy procedures in the dominant and non-dominant hemispheres. Aphasiology 16(12):1213–1226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030244000446
doi: 10.1080/02687030244000446
Whelan B-M, Murdoch B (2005) Unravelling subcortical linguistic substrates: comparison of thalamic versus cerebellar cognitive-linguistic regulation mechanisms. Aphasiology 19(12):1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500174050
doi: 10.1080/02687030500174050
Shao Z, Janse E, Visser K, Meyer AS (2014) What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults. Front Psychol 5:772. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00772
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00772
pubmed: 25101034
pmcid: 4106453
Whiteside DM, Kealey T, Semla M, Luu H, Rice L, Basso MR, Roper B (2016) Verbal fluency: language or executive function measure? Appl Neuropsychol Adult 23(1):29–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2015.1004574
doi: 10.1080/23279095.2015.1004574
pubmed: 26111011
Llano DA (2013) Functional imaging of the thalamus in language. Brain Lang 126(1):62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.06.004
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.06.004
pubmed: 22981716
Indefrey P, Levelt WJ (2004) The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92(1–2):101–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
pubmed: 15037128
Ford AA, Triplett W, Sudhyadhom A, Gullett J, McGregor K, Fitzgerald DB, Mareci T, White K, Crosson B (2013) Broca’s area and its striatal and thalamic connections: a diffusion—MRI tractography study. Front Neuroanat 7:8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2013.00008
doi: 10.3389/fnana.2013.00008
pubmed: 23675324
pmcid: 3650618
Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN (1990) Anatomical investigation of projections from thalamus to posterior parietal cortex in the rhesus monkey: a WGA-HRP and fluorescent tracer study. J Comp Neurol 295(2):299–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902950212
doi: 10.1002/cne.902950212
pubmed: 1694186
Kievit J, Kuypers HG (1977) Organization of the thalamo-cortical connexions to the frontal lobe in the rhesus monkey. Exp Brain Res 29(3–4):299–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00236173
doi: 10.1007/bf00236173
pubmed: 410652
Yeterian EH, Pandya DN (1989) Thalamic connections of the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 282(1):80–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902820107
doi: 10.1002/cne.902820107
pubmed: 2468699