The influence of flap design on patients' experiencing pain, swelling, and trismus after mandibular third molar surgery: a scoping systematic review.
Journal
Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB
ISSN: 1678-7765
Titre abrégé: J Appl Oral Sci
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101189774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
09
11
2020
accepted:
11
02
2021
entrez:
9
6
2021
pubmed:
10
6
2021
medline:
11
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Third molar removal surgery usually comes accompanied by postoperative discomfort, which could be influenced by the surgical approach chosen. This scoping systematic review aimed at compiling the available evidence focused on the influence of flap design, including envelope flap (EF), triangular flap (TF), and modified triangular flap (MTF), on postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus, as primary outcome measures, and any result mentioning healing promotion or delay, as secondary outcome measure, after mandibular third molar extraction surgery. An electronic search, complemented by a manual search, of articles published from 1999 to 2020 was conducted in the Medline (PubMed), EMBASE and Web of Science databases including human randomized controlled trials, prospective, and retrospective studies with at least 15 patients. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed either with the Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool or with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Every step of the review was performed independently and in duplicate. The initial electronic search recovered 2102 articles. After applying the inclusion criteria, 12 articles were included. For patient's perceived postoperative pain, TF and MTF frequently reported better results than EF. For swelling, the literature is divided, despite a trend favoring EF. For trismus, data showed that its occurrence is mostly associated with the duration of the surgery rather than with the chosen flap. For healing, the limited data is inconclusive. Finally, randomized studies showed a high risk of bias, whereas nonrandomized studies were mostly of good quality and low risk of bias. Although there was no clear consensus regarding the influence of different flap designs for third mandibular molar extraction on postoperative clinical morbidities; the surgeon's experience, estimated surgical difficulty, molar position and orientation, and surg ery duration should be considered when choosing among the different flap designs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34105693
pii: S1678-77572021000100801
doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0932
pmc: PMC8232931
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e20200932Références
J Dent Res. 2015 Jul;94(7):886-94
pubmed: 25883107
J Dent Res. 2018 Jan;97(1):5-13
pubmed: 28813182
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018 Jan 1;23(1):e92-e97
pubmed: 29274163
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Sep;15(3):147-52
pubmed: 21484217
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Oct;116(4):e244-6
pubmed: 22819455
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Mar;46(3):363-372
pubmed: 27600798
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2017 Summer;11(3):156-160
pubmed: 29184630
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Jul;116(1):16-22
pubmed: 23453611
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;41(8):1020-4
pubmed: 22424708
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Nov;39(11):1091-6
pubmed: 20727713
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jan;67(1):15-21
pubmed: 19070743
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016 Aug;122(2):124-33
pubmed: 27055733
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Aug;49(8):1073-1086
pubmed: 31974006
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 16;8(1):12281
pubmed: 30115957
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Sep;116(3):e179-84
pubmed: 22921446
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):e0190089
pubmed: 29272315
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019 Sep;128(3):235-242
pubmed: 31217081
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Nov;77(11):2222.e1-2222.e9
pubmed: 31306615
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017 May-Aug;21(2):317-318
pubmed: 28932049
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2011 Winter;5(1):1-4
pubmed: 23019499
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Sep 1;18(9):807-811
pubmed: 28874646
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jul 1;19(7):836-841
pubmed: 30066688
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Jul;104(1):e1-6
pubmed: 17507264
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Apr;95(4):403-8
pubmed: 12686924
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Jan;45(1):23-6
pubmed: 16434132
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Jul;104(1):18-23
pubmed: 17448707
Contemp Clin Dent. 2014 Apr;5(2):170-4
pubmed: 24963241
J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Jun;46(6):563-573
pubmed: 30869171
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 Mar 1;25(2):e233-e239
pubmed: 32062667
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Jul;63(7):929-35
pubmed: 16003617