FnCas9-based CRISPR diagnostic for rapid and accurate detection of major SARS-CoV-2 variants on a paper strip.
COVID-19
CRISPRDx
FELUDA
FnCas9
N501Y
epidemiology
global health
variants
virus
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 06 2021
09 06 2021
Historique:
received:
01
02
2021
accepted:
07
06
2021
pubmed:
10
6
2021
medline:
27
7
2021
entrez:
9
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic originating in the Wuhan province of China in late 2019 has impacted global health, causing increased mortality among elderly patients and individuals with comorbid conditions. During the passage of the virus through affected populations, it has undergone mutations, some of which have recently been linked with increased viral load and prognostic complexities. Several of these variants are point mutations that are difficult to diagnose using the gold standard quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) method and necessitates widespread sequencing which is expensive, has long turn-around times, and requires high viral load for calling mutations accurately. Here, we repurpose the high specificity of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, has a genome made of RNA (a nucleic acid similar to DNA) that can mutate, potentially making the disease more transmissible, and more lethal. Most countries have monitored the rise of mutated strains using a technique called next generation sequencing (NGS), which is time-consuming, expensive and requires skilled personnel. Sometimes the mutations to the virus are so small that they can only be detected using NGS. Finding cheaper, simpler and faster SARS-CoV-2 tests that can reliably detect mutated forms of the virus is crucial for public health authorities to monitor and manage the spread of the virus. Lateral flow tests (the same technology used in many pregnancy tests) are typically cheap, fast and simple to use. Typically, lateral flow assay strips have a band of immobilised antibodies that bind to a specific protein (or antigen). If a sample contains antigen molecules, these will bind to the immobilised antibodies, causing a chemical reaction that changes the colour of the strip and giving a positive result. However, lateral flow tests that use antibodies cannot easily detect nucleic acids, such as DNA or RNA, let alone mutations in them. To overcome this limitation, lateral flow assays can be used to detect a protein called Cas9, which, in turn, is able to bind to nucleic acids with specific sequences. Small changes in the target sequence change how well Cas9 binds to it, meaning that, in theory, this approach could be used to detect small mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Kumar et al. made a lateral flow test that could detect a Cas9 protein that binds to a nucleic acid sequence found in a specific mutant strain of SARS-CoV-2. This Cas9 was highly sensitive to changes in its target sequence, so a small mutation in the target nucleic acid led to the protein binding less strongly, and the signal from the lateral flow test being lost. This meant that the lateral flow test designed by Kumar et al. could detect mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 virus at a fraction of the price of NGS approaches if used only for diagnosis. The lateral flow test was capable of detecting mutant viruses in patient samples too, generating a colour signal within an hour of a positive sample being run through the assay. The test developed by Kumar et al. could offer public health authorities a quick and cheap method to monitor the spread of mutant SARS-CoV-2 strains; as well as a way to determine vaccine efficacy against new strains.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, has a genome made of RNA (a nucleic acid similar to DNA) that can mutate, potentially making the disease more transmissible, and more lethal. Most countries have monitored the rise of mutated strains using a technique called next generation sequencing (NGS), which is time-consuming, expensive and requires skilled personnel. Sometimes the mutations to the virus are so small that they can only be detected using NGS. Finding cheaper, simpler and faster SARS-CoV-2 tests that can reliably detect mutated forms of the virus is crucial for public health authorities to monitor and manage the spread of the virus. Lateral flow tests (the same technology used in many pregnancy tests) are typically cheap, fast and simple to use. Typically, lateral flow assay strips have a band of immobilised antibodies that bind to a specific protein (or antigen). If a sample contains antigen molecules, these will bind to the immobilised antibodies, causing a chemical reaction that changes the colour of the strip and giving a positive result. However, lateral flow tests that use antibodies cannot easily detect nucleic acids, such as DNA or RNA, let alone mutations in them. To overcome this limitation, lateral flow assays can be used to detect a protein called Cas9, which, in turn, is able to bind to nucleic acids with specific sequences. Small changes in the target sequence change how well Cas9 binds to it, meaning that, in theory, this approach could be used to detect small mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Kumar et al. made a lateral flow test that could detect a Cas9 protein that binds to a nucleic acid sequence found in a specific mutant strain of SARS-CoV-2. This Cas9 was highly sensitive to changes in its target sequence, so a small mutation in the target nucleic acid led to the protein binding less strongly, and the signal from the lateral flow test being lost. This meant that the lateral flow test designed by Kumar et al. could detect mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 virus at a fraction of the price of NGS approaches if used only for diagnosis. The lateral flow test was capable of detecting mutant viruses in patient samples too, generating a colour signal within an hour of a positive sample being run through the assay. The test developed by Kumar et al. could offer public health authorities a quick and cheap method to monitor the spread of mutant SARS-CoV-2 strains; as well as a way to determine vaccine efficacy against new strains.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34106048
doi: 10.7554/eLife.67130
pii: 67130
pmc: PMC8289407
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : University Grants Commission
ID : Graduate student fellowship
Organisme : IUSSTF
ID : CLP-0033
Organisme : CSIR Sickle Cell Anemia Mission
ID : HCP0008
Organisme : Tata Steel
ID : SSP 2001
Organisme : Lady Tata Young Investigator
ID : GAP0198
Organisme : CSIR
ID : Graduate Student fellowship
Organisme : CSIR
ID : Research Associateship
Organisme : Indian Council of Medical Research
ID : Graduate Student fellowship
Organisme : CSIR
ID : MLP 2005
Organisme : Fondation Botnar
ID : CLP-0031
Organisme : Intel Corporation
ID : CLP-0034
Organisme : CSIR
ID : HCP0008
Organisme : Lady Tata Memorial Trust
ID : GAP0198
Informations de copyright
© 2021, Kumar et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MK, SG, AA, RP, SA, JM, PK, AK, RM, JV, AS, RP, SM No competing interests declared, MA Mohd. Azhar is currently an employee of TATA Medical and Diagnostics, DC A patent application has been filed in relation to this work. (0127NF2019).
Références
Nat Med. 2021 Apr;27(4):622-625
pubmed: 33654292
Biosens Bioelectron. 2021 Jul 1;183:113207
pubmed: 33866136
Nat Med. 2021 Apr;27(4):620-621
pubmed: 33558724
Pathogens. 2020 Mar 20;9(3):
pubmed: 32245083
Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2001 May;Chapter 9:Unit 9.8
pubmed: 18428319
Nat Methods. 2015 Aug;12(8):733-5
pubmed: 26076426
Bioinformatics. 2018 Sep 15;34(18):3094-3100
pubmed: 29750242
Cell. 2021 May 27;184(11):2939-2954.e9
pubmed: 33852911
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2021 Jan;413(1):49-71
pubmed: 33073312
Elife. 2020 Oct 28;9:
pubmed: 33112236
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0247115
pubmed: 33596239
Cell Discov. 2020 May 19;6:34
pubmed: 32435508
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 18;11(1):4711
pubmed: 32948757
JAMA. 2021 Mar 16;325(11):1037-1038
pubmed: 33595644
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Jul;38(7):870-874
pubmed: 32300245
Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1398-1404
pubmed: 32647358
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 15;116(42):20959-20968
pubmed: 31570623
Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1405-1410
pubmed: 32678356
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021 Mar;19(3):171-183
pubmed: 33057203
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 29;10(10):
pubmed: 33003465
Cell. 2020 Aug 20;182(4):812-827.e19
pubmed: 32697968
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Aug;40(15):e115
pubmed: 22730293
Science. 2021 Apr 9;372(6538):
pubmed: 33658326
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7852):122-127
pubmed: 33636719
Cell. 2021 Jan 21;184(2):323-333.e9
pubmed: 33306959
Elife. 2021 Aug 20;10:
pubmed: 34414884
Biosens Bioelectron. 2021 Jan 15;172:112766
pubmed: 33126177
Bioinformatics. 2018 Dec 1;34(23):4121-4123
pubmed: 29790939
Euro Surveill. 2017 Mar 30;22(13):
pubmed: 28382917
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 20;12(1):469
pubmed: 33473140
J Adv Res. 2020 Nov;26:149-159
pubmed: 32837738
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 May;27(5):1522-1524
pubmed: 33605869
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1492-1494
pubmed: 32937062
FEBS Lett. 2021 May;595(10):1454-1461
pubmed: 33728680
Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Jun;20(6):341-355
pubmed: 30918369
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D766-D773
pubmed: 30357393
Cell Rep. 2020 Nov 3;33(5):108352
pubmed: 33113345
Nat Biomed Eng. 2020 Dec;4(12):1140-1149
pubmed: 32848209
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;20(11):1263-1272
pubmed: 32679081
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D571-7
pubmed: 25428358
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Mar 15;30(6):1292-305
pubmed: 11884626
Nature. 2021 May;593(7857):136-141
pubmed: 33706364
Nature. 2021 May;593(7858):266-269
pubmed: 33767447
ACS Cent Sci. 2020 May 27;6(5):591-605
pubmed: 32382657
J Transl Med. 2020 Apr 22;18(1):179
pubmed: 32321524
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):952-954
pubmed: 33581803
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Nov;5(11):1403-1407
pubmed: 32669681
Genomics. 2020 Sep;112(5):3588-3596
pubmed: 32353474