COVID-19, individual wellbeing and multi-dimensional poverty in the state of South Australia.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 10 02 2021
accepted: 24 05 2021
entrez: 10 6 2021
pubmed: 11 6 2021
medline: 24 6 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Research efforts in the initial months of the COVID-19 pandemic focused on the actual and potential impacts on societies, economies, sectors, and governments. Less attention was paid to the experiences of individuals and less still to the impact of COVID-19 on an individual's wellbeing. This research addresses this gap by utilising a holistic wellbeing framework to examine the impact of COVID-19 on the overall wellbeing of individuals in the Australian state of South Australia through an online survey. The research framework for the survey comprises six dimensions: psychological and emotional health, physical health, living standards, family and community vitality, governance, and ecological diversity and resilience. The results show that most respondents (71%) were able to maintain overall wellbeing during the pandemic. However, more than a half of the respondents could not maintain wellbeing in psychological and emotional health. Further examination of the drivers of inability to maintain overall wellbeing reveals that low-income individuals, younger respondents (aged 18-24) and women suffer disproportionate hardships. Defining poverty in terms of multi-dimensional deprivations in wellbeing enables a nuanced analysis of the unequal impacts of COVID-19 mitigation policies that can be used to improve policymaking.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34111173
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252898
pii: PONE-D-21-01771
pmc: PMC8191965
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0252898

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There is no competing interest that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of this article submitted to PLOS ONE.

Références

BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2020 May 20;3(1):74-92
pubmed: 33230497
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Mar;152:176-85
pubmed: 26854627
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 06;11:579985
pubmed: 33132940
Med Leg J. 2020 Jul;88(2):71-73
pubmed: 32501175
Lancet. 2010 Sep 18;376(9745):991-1023
pubmed: 20833426

Auteurs

Udoy Saikia (U)

College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.

Melinda M Dodd (MM)

College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.

James Chalmers (J)

College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.

Gouranga Dasvarma (G)

College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.

Susanne Schech (S)

College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH