A survey of midwifery graduates' opinions about midwifery education in Iran: a cross-sectional study.
Clinical education
Education
Midwifery
Midwifery education
Satisfaction
Student
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jun 2021
10 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
11
12
2020
accepted:
26
05
2021
entrez:
11
6
2021
pubmed:
12
6
2021
medline:
16
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Attaining high-quality education requires continuous evaluation and revision of the curriculum. The view of the graduate students can provide valuable insight into the necessary evaluations and revisions. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the opinions of midwifery graduates about midwifery education in Iran METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study and the research data were collected through a census sampling procedure from all (82) midwifery graduates of the Nursing and Midwifery School of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences between 2018 and 2020. The data collection instrument was a validated researcher-made questionnaire derived from the Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) developed by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). The data were then analyzed using SPSS 22. In this study, about 62% of the graduates were satisfied with the quality of the midwifery education they had received during the four-year program. Moreover, 61% of the graduates maintained that theoretical courses were well-integrated with the clinical experience they needed. The quality of the internships in different wards and departments was also evaluated from the viewpoints of the graduates, and the results indicated that they were relatively satisfied with their internship experiences. However, only 40% of the graduates were satisfied with the quality of their clinical evaluation, since they faced the most significant challenges in the clinical and maternity wards (47%) with the midwifery staff and gynecology residents and found the quality of facilities in the clinical program to be lacking. According to the participants, the quality of teaching was not good for some courses such as biochemistry and microbiology. It seems that the midwifery curriculum needs to be constantly revised, aiming to improve student satisfaction with their midwifery education. Some effective measures in this regard are employing experienced professors, developing cooperation between midwifery instructors and clinical departments, and trying to improve the educational environment. Attention to the improvement of facilities and equipment and agreement between the content of the theoretical education and practical topics are also recommended to improve the quality of midwifery education.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Attaining high-quality education requires continuous evaluation and revision of the curriculum. The view of the graduate students can provide valuable insight into the necessary evaluations and revisions. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the opinions of midwifery graduates about midwifery education in Iran METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study and the research data were collected through a census sampling procedure from all (82) midwifery graduates of the Nursing and Midwifery School of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences between 2018 and 2020. The data collection instrument was a validated researcher-made questionnaire derived from the Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) developed by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). The data were then analyzed using SPSS 22.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In this study, about 62% of the graduates were satisfied with the quality of the midwifery education they had received during the four-year program. Moreover, 61% of the graduates maintained that theoretical courses were well-integrated with the clinical experience they needed. The quality of the internships in different wards and departments was also evaluated from the viewpoints of the graduates, and the results indicated that they were relatively satisfied with their internship experiences. However, only 40% of the graduates were satisfied with the quality of their clinical evaluation, since they faced the most significant challenges in the clinical and maternity wards (47%) with the midwifery staff and gynecology residents and found the quality of facilities in the clinical program to be lacking. According to the participants, the quality of teaching was not good for some courses such as biochemistry and microbiology.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
It seems that the midwifery curriculum needs to be constantly revised, aiming to improve student satisfaction with their midwifery education. Some effective measures in this regard are employing experienced professors, developing cooperation between midwifery instructors and clinical departments, and trying to improve the educational environment. Attention to the improvement of facilities and equipment and agreement between the content of the theoretical education and practical topics are also recommended to improve the quality of midwifery education.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34112177
doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02764-y
pii: 10.1186/s12909-021-02764-y
pmc: PMC8194225
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
340Références
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Mar;34(3):421-7
pubmed: 23642340
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2015 Jan;3(1):15-20
pubmed: 25587550
BMC Nurs. 2019 Oct 30;18:49
pubmed: 31695575
Midwifery. 2011 Aug;27(4):409-16
pubmed: 21550149
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 Nov 15;13:41
pubmed: 27894183
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2016 Apr;4(2):88-92
pubmed: 27104203
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):130-7
pubmed: 27405193
Nurse Educ Pract. 2013 Mar;13(2):78-82
pubmed: 22902569
Midwifery. 2008 Sep;24(3):260-9
pubmed: 17267083
Nurse Educ Pract. 2014 Mar;14(2):160-3
pubmed: 24012410
Women Birth. 2012 Sep;25(3):e27-36
pubmed: 21940231
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Jan;28:135-140
pubmed: 29080434
J Nurs Manag. 2014 Sep;22(6):685-96
pubmed: 24815559
Women Birth. 2019 Dec;32(6):e523-e529
pubmed: 30665739
Nurse Educ Pract. 2014 Aug;14(4):427-33
pubmed: 24512652
Nurse Educ Pract. 2015 May;15(3):243-8
pubmed: 25701290
BMC Med Educ. 2017 May 3;17(1):80
pubmed: 28468617
Midwifery. 2014 May;30(5):519-25
pubmed: 23725754
Int J Med Educ. 2018 Mar 09;9:64-71
pubmed: 29537968
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 May;76:118-124
pubmed: 30784839
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 May 20;130(10):1259-1260
pubmed: 28485331
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jan;53:308-19
pubmed: 26522265
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 8;12(11):e0187863
pubmed: 29117271
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):78
pubmed: 32183791
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Mar;29:110-115
pubmed: 29248798
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Feb;54:173-87
pubmed: 26143357