Impact of laparoscopy on oncological outcomes after colectomy for stage III colon cancer: A post-hoc multivariate analysis from PETACC8 European randomized clinical trial.


Journal

Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver
ISSN: 1878-3562
Titre abrégé: Dig Liver Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100958385

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Historique:
received: 20 02 2021
revised: 11 05 2021
accepted: 14 05 2021
pubmed: 12 6 2021
medline: 3 2 2022
entrez: 11 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In colon cancer (CC), surgery remains the mainstay of treatment with curative intent. Despite several clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic approaches, data on long-term outcomes for stage III CC are lacking. This post-hoc analysis of the European PETACC8 randomized phase 3 trial included patients from 340 sites between December 2005 and November 2009, with long follow-up (median 7.56 years). Patients were randomly assigned to FOLFOX or FOLFOX+cetuximab after colonic resection. The surgical approach was left to the referring surgeon's discretion. Among 2555 patients included, 1796 (70.29%) were operated on by open surgery and 759 (29.71%) by laparoscopy. The 5-year OS rate was better after laparoscopic resection (85.4%, 95%CI 82.5-87.7) than after open surgery (80.2%, 95%CI 78.2-82.0; p = 0.002). The 5-year DFS rate was also better after laparoscopy (p = 0.016). However, in multivariate analysis using a propensity matching, the surgical approach was not found to be an independent prognostic factor for OS or DFS. OS (p = 0.0243) and DFS (p = 0.035) were increased after laparoscopic surgery in KRAS/BRAF WT sub-group CONCLUSION: We showed that laparoscopic resection has comparable long-term outcomes to open surgery in patients with stage III CC. For those with RAS and BRAF WT CC, laparoscopic colectomy may favorably impact survival.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In colon cancer (CC), surgery remains the mainstay of treatment with curative intent. Despite several clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic approaches, data on long-term outcomes for stage III CC are lacking.
METHODS METHODS
This post-hoc analysis of the European PETACC8 randomized phase 3 trial included patients from 340 sites between December 2005 and November 2009, with long follow-up (median 7.56 years). Patients were randomly assigned to FOLFOX or FOLFOX+cetuximab after colonic resection. The surgical approach was left to the referring surgeon's discretion.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among 2555 patients included, 1796 (70.29%) were operated on by open surgery and 759 (29.71%) by laparoscopy. The 5-year OS rate was better after laparoscopic resection (85.4%, 95%CI 82.5-87.7) than after open surgery (80.2%, 95%CI 78.2-82.0; p = 0.002). The 5-year DFS rate was also better after laparoscopy (p = 0.016). However, in multivariate analysis using a propensity matching, the surgical approach was not found to be an independent prognostic factor for OS or DFS. OS (p = 0.0243) and DFS (p = 0.035) were increased after laparoscopic surgery in KRAS/BRAF WT sub-group CONCLUSION: We showed that laparoscopic resection has comparable long-term outcomes to open surgery in patients with stage III CC. For those with RAS and BRAF WT CC, laparoscopic colectomy may favorably impact survival.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34112615
pii: S1590-8658(21)00264-4
doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.05.012
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents 0
Organoplatinum Compounds 0
Cetuximab PQX0D8J21J
Leucovorin Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil U3P01618RT

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1034-1040

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflict of interest for the present manuscript.

Auteurs

Thibault Voron (T)

Sorbonne Université, Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.

Mehdi Karoui (M)

Université de Paris, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France. Electronic address: mehdi.karoui@aphp.fr.

Réa Lo Dico (R)

Université de Paris, Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.

Karine Le Malicot (KL)

Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Faculty of Medecine, Dijon, France; EPICAD INSERM UMR LNC 1231, University of Burgundy Franche Comté, Dijon France.

Eloy Espin (E)

Department of General Surgery, Hospital Valle de Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Fabio Cianchi (F)

Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Weitz Jürgen (W)

Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technical University Dresden, Germany.

Alexis Buggenhout (A)

Department of surgical gastroenterology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Matthieu Bruzzi (M)

Université de Paris, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.

Fabrice Denimal (F)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France.

Antoine Cazelles (A)

Université de Paris, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.

Richard Douard (R)

Université de Paris, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.

Come Lepage (C)

EPICAD INSERM UMR LNC 1231, University of Burgundy Franche Comté, Dijon France; HepatoGastroenterology and Digestive oncology department, University hospital Dijon, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, FFCD, EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, Dijon, France.

Julien Taieb (J)

Université de Paris, Department of Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH