IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, multi-center trial in healthy subjects to investigate the effects of lacosamide, pregabalin, and tapentadol on biomarkers of pain processing observed by electroencephalography (EEG).
Analgesics
Biomarkers
EEG
Healthy subjects
Hyperalgesia
Laser-evoked potentials
PK/PD
Pain
Pinprick-evoked potentials
Randomized controlled trial
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jun 2021
17 Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
20
10
2020
accepted:
15
04
2021
entrez:
18
6
2021
pubmed:
19
6
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 is one of four similarly designed clinical studies aiming at profiling a set of functional biomarkers of drug effects on the nociceptive system that could serve to accelerate the future development of analgesics, by providing a quantitative understanding between drug exposure and effects of the drug on nociceptive signal processing in human volunteers. IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 will focus on biomarkers derived from non-invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) measures of brain activity. This is a multisite single-dose, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-period, 4-way crossover, pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) study in healthy subjects. Biomarkers derived from scalp EEG measurements (laser-evoked brain potentials [LEPs], pinprick-evoked brain potentials [PEPs], resting EEG) will be obtained before and three times after administration of three medications known to act on the nociceptive system (lacosamide, pregabalin, tapentadol) and placebo, given as a single oral dose in separate study periods. Medication effects will be assessed concurrently in a non-sensitized normal condition and a clinically relevant hyperalgesic condition (high-frequency electrical stimulation of the skin). Patient-reported outcomes will also be collected. A sequentially rejective multiple testing approach will be used with overall alpha error of the primary analysis split between LEP and PEP under tapentadol. Remaining treatment arm effects on LEP or PEP or effects on EEG are key secondary confirmatory analyses. Complex statistical analyses and PK-PD modeling are exploratory. LEPs and PEPs are brain responses related to the selective activation of thermonociceptors and mechanonociceptors. Their amplitudes are dependent on the responsiveness of these nociceptors and the state of the pathways relaying nociceptive input at the level of the spinal cord and brain. The magnitude of resting EEG oscillations is sensitive to changes in brain network function, and some modulations of oscillation magnitude can relate to perceived pain intensity, variations in vigilance, and attentional states. These oscillations can also be affected by analgesic drugs acting on the central nervous system. For these reasons, IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 hypothesizes that EEG-derived measures can serve as biomarkers of target engagement of analgesic drugs for future Phase 1 clinical trials. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials could also benefit from these tools for patient stratification. This trial was registered 25/06/2019 in EudraCT ( 2019%2D%2D001204-37 ).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 is one of four similarly designed clinical studies aiming at profiling a set of functional biomarkers of drug effects on the nociceptive system that could serve to accelerate the future development of analgesics, by providing a quantitative understanding between drug exposure and effects of the drug on nociceptive signal processing in human volunteers. IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 will focus on biomarkers derived from non-invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) measures of brain activity.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a multisite single-dose, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-period, 4-way crossover, pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) study in healthy subjects. Biomarkers derived from scalp EEG measurements (laser-evoked brain potentials [LEPs], pinprick-evoked brain potentials [PEPs], resting EEG) will be obtained before and three times after administration of three medications known to act on the nociceptive system (lacosamide, pregabalin, tapentadol) and placebo, given as a single oral dose in separate study periods. Medication effects will be assessed concurrently in a non-sensitized normal condition and a clinically relevant hyperalgesic condition (high-frequency electrical stimulation of the skin). Patient-reported outcomes will also be collected. A sequentially rejective multiple testing approach will be used with overall alpha error of the primary analysis split between LEP and PEP under tapentadol. Remaining treatment arm effects on LEP or PEP or effects on EEG are key secondary confirmatory analyses. Complex statistical analyses and PK-PD modeling are exploratory.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
LEPs and PEPs are brain responses related to the selective activation of thermonociceptors and mechanonociceptors. Their amplitudes are dependent on the responsiveness of these nociceptors and the state of the pathways relaying nociceptive input at the level of the spinal cord and brain. The magnitude of resting EEG oscillations is sensitive to changes in brain network function, and some modulations of oscillation magnitude can relate to perceived pain intensity, variations in vigilance, and attentional states. These oscillations can also be affected by analgesic drugs acting on the central nervous system. For these reasons, IMI2-PainCare-BioPain-RCT3 hypothesizes that EEG-derived measures can serve as biomarkers of target engagement of analgesic drugs for future Phase 1 clinical trials. Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials could also benefit from these tools for patient stratification.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
This trial was registered 25/06/2019 in EudraCT ( 2019%2D%2D001204-37 ).
Identifiants
pubmed: 34140041
doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05272-y
pii: 10.1186/s13063-021-05272-y
pmc: PMC8212499
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Pregabalin
55JG375S6M
Lacosamide
563KS2PQY5
Tapentadol
H8A007M585
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
404Subventions
Organisme : Innovative Medicines Initiative
ID : 777500
Références
Drugs R D. 2015 Jun;15(2):195-201
pubmed: 25939332
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Nov;114(5):2672-81
pubmed: 26334010
Stat Med. 2009 Feb 15;28(4):586-604
pubmed: 19051220
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Mar;73(3):363-72
pubmed: 21950372
Int J Rehabil Res. 2003 Jun;26(2):85-91
pubmed: 12799601
Pain. 2009 Nov;146(1-2):65-74
pubmed: 19665301
EBioMedicine. 2019 Jan;39:401-408
pubmed: 30503201
Diabetes Care. 2010 Apr;33(4):839-41
pubmed: 20067958
Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr;121(4):577-87
pubmed: 20110192
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Feb;21(2):100-110
pubmed: 28025007
Clin J Pain. 2009 Jun;25(5):376-85
pubmed: 19454870
J Physiol. 1995 Mar 15;483 ( Pt 3):747-58
pubmed: 7776255
Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Sep;34(9):617-26
pubmed: 25078976
Neurophysiol Clin. 2003 Dec;33(6):259-68
pubmed: 14678840
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2010 Sep;19(9):1129-34
pubmed: 20687785
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
pubmed: 2868172
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jan;77(1):72-95
pubmed: 23593934
Stat Med. 1993 Nov 30;12(22):2147-51
pubmed: 8310185
Hum Neurobiol. 1984;3(1):33-40
pubmed: 6330009
Psychiatry Res. 1999 Dec 27;89(3):201-14
pubmed: 10708266
J Neurosci. 2012 May 30;32(22):7429-38
pubmed: 22649223
J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Aug;50(8):941-50
pubmed: 20147618
Exp Brain Res. 1987;67(1):153-62
pubmed: 3622675
Eur J Pain. 2010 Feb;14(2):222-5
pubmed: 19477145
Neurophysiol Clin. 2003 Dec;33(6):269-77
pubmed: 14678841
Neuroimage. 2010 Mar;50(1):99-111
pubmed: 20004255
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Jul;117(7):1574-81
pubmed: 16679057
Pharmacology. 2012;90(1-2):40-6
pubmed: 22722651
Neurophysiol Clin. 2003 Dec;33(6):303-14
pubmed: 14678844
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Nov;104(6):514-21
pubmed: 9402893
Brain. 2019 Feb 1;142(2):263-275
pubmed: 30649227
Br J Anaesth. 1996 Aug;77(2):165-71
pubmed: 8881619
Clin J Pain. 2007 Feb;23(2):150-8
pubmed: 17237664
J Pain. 2009 Aug;10(8):818-28
pubmed: 19409861
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Dec;76(6):951-63
pubmed: 23521205
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;101(6):3258-69
pubmed: 19339457
Neuroimage. 2001 Aug;14(2):383-90
pubmed: 11467912
Front Psychol. 2011 May 10;2:82
pubmed: 21687452
J Neurosci. 2004 Jan 28;24(4):964-71
pubmed: 14749441
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Apr;111(8):1564-73
pubmed: 24453277
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):535-8
pubmed: 20975469
Epilepsia. 2013 Jan;54(1):81-8
pubmed: 23148731
Neurophysiol Clin. 2003 Dec;33(6):279-92
pubmed: 14678842
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2002;24 Suppl D:5-12
pubmed: 12575463
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Sep;110(5):1107-16
pubmed: 23678019
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Aug;128(8):1445-1456
pubmed: 28618295
Pain. 2011 Jul;152(7):1532-1539
pubmed: 21440369