Level of Agreement Between Systematic Doppler Examination of the Lower Extremity and Diagnostic Angiography in the Setting of Peripheral Arterial Disease.
Journal
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
ISSN: 1930-8264
Titre abrégé: J Am Podiatr Med Assoc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8501423
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2021
01 May 2021
Historique:
entrez:
18
6
2021
pubmed:
19
6
2021
medline:
29
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this investigation was to determine the level of agreement between a systematic clinical Doppler examination of the foot and ankle and diagnostic peripheral angiography. The described Doppler examination technique attempted to determine the patency, quality, and direction of the flow through the dorsalis pedis artery, posterior tibial artery, terminal branches of the peroneal artery, and vascular arch of the foot. These results were then compared with angiographic distal run-off images as interpreted by a blinded vascular surgeon. Levels of agreement with respect to artery patency/quality ranged from 64.0% to 84.0%. Sensitivity ranged from 53.8% to 84.2%, and specificity ranged from 64.7% to 91.7%. Agreement with respect to arterial flow direction ranged from 73.3% to 90.5%. We interpret these results to indicate that this comprehensive physical examination technique of the arterial flow to the foot and ankle with a Doppler device might serve as a reasonable initial surrogate to diagnostic angiography in some patients with peripheral arterial disease.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The objective of this investigation was to determine the level of agreement between a systematic clinical Doppler examination of the foot and ankle and diagnostic peripheral angiography.
METHODS
METHODS
The described Doppler examination technique attempted to determine the patency, quality, and direction of the flow through the dorsalis pedis artery, posterior tibial artery, terminal branches of the peroneal artery, and vascular arch of the foot. These results were then compared with angiographic distal run-off images as interpreted by a blinded vascular surgeon.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Levels of agreement with respect to artery patency/quality ranged from 64.0% to 84.0%. Sensitivity ranged from 53.8% to 84.2%, and specificity ranged from 64.7% to 91.7%. Agreement with respect to arterial flow direction ranged from 73.3% to 90.5%.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We interpret these results to indicate that this comprehensive physical examination technique of the arterial flow to the foot and ankle with a Doppler device might serve as a reasonable initial surrogate to diagnostic angiography in some patients with peripheral arterial disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34144576
pii: 466696
doi: 10.7547/18-140
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM