Prognostic Role of FGFR Alterations and FGFR mRNA Expression in Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Undergoing Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ therapeutic use
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
/ drug therapy
Female
Gene Expression
Gene Fusion
Humans
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Mutation
Nivolumab
/ therapeutic use
Pilot Projects
Prognosis
Proportional Hazards Models
RNA, Messenger
/ metabolism
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1
/ genetics
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2
/ genetics
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3
/ genetics
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4
/ genetics
Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor
/ genetics
Survival Rate
Urologic Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Journal
Urology
ISSN: 1527-9995
Titre abrégé: Urology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0366151
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
25
02
2021
revised:
23
05
2021
accepted:
28
05
2021
pubmed:
22
6
2021
medline:
1
2
2022
entrez:
21
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To examine the disease-specific survival(DSS) after checkpoint inhibitor(CPI) therapy based on FGFR alterations and FGFR mRNA expression levels in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer(mUCa) within a multi-center cohort. Within a cohort of 72 patients with mUCa from five academic centers in Germany FGFR alterations, as well as FGFR1-4 mRNA expression levels in tumor samples from the primary tumor or metastatic sites. Spearman rank correlations, logistic regression, as well as Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and univariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to examine the impact of different FGFR patterns on the DSS after CPI treatment. FGFR3 mutations or gene fusions (gene alterations) were detected in 16.9% of all samples. Patients with or without FGFR3 gene alterations did not show different oncological outcomes undergoing CPI treatment. Low expression of FGFR2 mRNA alone, as well as the combination of either low FGFR2mRNA expression and FGFR3 gene alteration or high FGFR3mRNA expression (P = 0.027), identified a subgroup of patients with unfavorable outcomes, comprising 40% of the total cohort. This trend was also observed in univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis(FGFR3 gene alteration: Hazard ratio(HR) 5.33, 95%Confidence interval(CI)1.76-15.0, P = 0.004; FGFR3mRNA expression:HR 3.04, 95%CI 1.40-7.13, P = 0.005). Assessment of FGFR mRNA expression identified a high-risk subgroup of patients with mUCa. These patients showing overexpression of FGFR3 mRNA were found to have unfavorable DSS after CPI treatment. Using this approach may be suitable for identifying a patient population with poor response to CPI treatment, which may benefit from early FGFR inhibition.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34153367
pii: S0090-4295(21)00485-4
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.055
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
RNA, Messenger
0
Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
atezolizumab
52CMI0WC3Y
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
93-101Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.