Omidubicel vs standard myeloablative umbilical cord blood transplantation: results of a phase 3 randomized study.
Journal
Blood
ISSN: 1528-0020
Titre abrégé: Blood
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603509
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 10 2021
21 10 2021
Historique:
received:
19
03
2021
accepted:
22
05
2021
pubmed:
23
6
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
22
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Omidubicel is an ex vivo expanded hematopoietic progenitor cell and nonexpanded myeloid and lymphoid cell product derived from a single umbilical cord blood unit. We report results of a phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy of omidubicel compared with standard umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT). Between January 2017 and January 2020, 125 patients age 13 to 65 years with hematologic malignancies were randomly assigned to omidubicel vs standard UCBT. Patients received myeloablative conditioning and prophylaxis with a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The primary end point was time to neutrophil engraftment. The treatment arms were well balanced and racially diverse. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 12 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 10-14 days) for the omidubicel arm and 22 days (95% CI, 19-25 days) for the control arm (P < .001). The cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was 96% for patients receiving omidubicel and 89% for patients receiving control transplants. The omidubicel arm had faster platelet recovery (55% vs 35% recovery by 42 days; P = .028), had a lower incidence of first grade 2 to 3 bacterial or invasive fungal infection (37% vs 57%; P = .027), and spent more time out of hospital during the first 100 days after transplant (median, 61 vs 48 days; P = .005) than controls. Differences in GVHD and survival between the 2 arms were not statistically significant. Transplantation with omidubicel results in faster hematopoietic recovery and reduces early transplant-related complications compared with standard UCBT. The results suggest that omidubicel may be considered as a new standard of care for adult patients eligible for UCBT. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02730299.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34157093
pii: S0006-4971(21)01261-1
doi: 10.1182/blood.2021011719
pmc: PMC9710469
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02730299']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1429-1440Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA014051
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.
Références
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jun;18(6):903-12
pubmed: 22062801
N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 13;367(24):2305-15
pubmed: 23234514
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 10;37(5):367-374
pubmed: 30523748
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Feb;26(2):358-366
pubmed: 31655119
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Sep;22(9):1636-1645
pubmed: 27343716
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Feb;7(2):e134-e145
pubmed: 31704264
Exp Hematol. 2012 Apr;40(4):342-55.e1
pubmed: 22198152
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Feb;22(2):359-370
pubmed: 26409243
Blood. 2000 Jul 1;96(1):80-5
pubmed: 10891434
J Clin Invest. 2014 Jul;124(7):3121-8
pubmed: 24911148
Cell Stem Cell. 2016 Jan 7;18(1):144-55
pubmed: 26669897
Nat Med. 2010 Feb;16(2):232-6
pubmed: 20081862
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Nov;20(11):1819-27
pubmed: 25064747
Biometrics. 2011 Sep;67(3):1135-41
pubmed: 21281276
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 24;371(4):339-48
pubmed: 25054717
Blood. 2021 Jan 21;137(3):420-428
pubmed: 33475736