Introducing ground cover management in pesticide emission modeling.

Active ingredient Cover crop Environmental modeling Farming practices Life cycle assessment

Journal

Integrated environmental assessment and management
ISSN: 1551-3793
Titre abrégé: Integr Environ Assess Manag
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101234521

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Historique:
revised: 08 03 2021
received: 02 12 2020
accepted: 13 06 2021
pubmed: 24 6 2021
medline: 24 12 2021
entrez: 23 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Ground cover management (GCM) is an important agricultural practice used to reduce weed growth, erosion and runoff, and improve soil fertility. In the present study, an approach to account for GCM is proposed in the modeling of pesticide emissions to evaluate the environmental sustainability of agricultural practices. As a starting point, we include a cover crop compartment in the mass balance of calculating initial (within minutes after application) and secondary (including additional processes) pesticide emission fractions. The following parameters were considered: (i) cover crop occupation between the rows of main field crops, (ii) cover crop canopy density, and (iii) cover crop family. Two modalities of cover crop occupation and cover crop canopy density were tested for two crop growth stages, using scenarios without cover crops as control. From that, emission fractions and related ecotoxicity impacts were estimated for pesticides applied to tomato production in Martinique (French West Indies) and to grapevine cultivation in the Loire Valley (France). Our results demonstrate that, on average, the presence of a cover crop reduced the pesticide emission fraction reaching field soil by a factor of 3 compared with bare soil, independently of field crop and its growth stage, and cover crop occupation and density. When considering cover exported from the field, ecotoxicity impacts were reduced by approximately 65% and 90%, compared with bare soil for grapevine and tomato, respectively, regardless of the emission distribution used. Because additional processes may influence emission distributions under GCM, such as runoff, leaching, or preferential flow, further research is required to incorporate these processes consistently in our proposed GCM approach. Considering GCM in pesticide emission modeling highlights the potential of soil cover to reduce pesticide emissions to field soil and related freshwater ecotoxicity. Furthermore, the consideration of GCM as common farming practice allows the modeling of pesticide emissions in intercropping systems. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:274-288. © 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Identifiants

pubmed: 34160881
doi: 10.1002/ieam.4482
pmc: PMC9291296
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pesticides 0
Soil 0
Soil Pollutants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

274-288

Subventions

Organisme : Agence de l`Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l`Energie
ID : 17-03-C0025
Organisme : Agence de l`Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l`Energie
ID : 17MAC0038
Organisme : European Commission
ID : 862568
Organisme : European Commission
ID : 863059
Organisme : European Regional Development Fund
ID : MQ0003772-CIRAD

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Références

J Agric Food Chem. 2016 May 25;64(20):3917-24
pubmed: 27160796
Chemosphere. 2021 Jul;275:130014
pubmed: 33662717
Chemosphere. 2008 Feb;70(10):1748-55
pubmed: 17919680
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Feb 27;191(3):196
pubmed: 30815729
J Environ Qual. 2007 Jul 17;36(5):1301-9
pubmed: 17636291
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Oct 15;45(20):8842-9
pubmed: 21905656
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Mar;24(8):6895-6909
pubmed: 27194012
Chemosphere. 2015 Jan;119:1007-1014
pubmed: 25303661
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Dec;37(12):2955-2971
pubmed: 30178491
Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2021 May;26(5):899-915
pubmed: 34140756
Nature. 2013 Mar 21;495(7441):305-7
pubmed: 23518546
J Agric Food Chem. 2016 May 25;64(20):3990-8
pubmed: 26479088
Chemosphere. 2017 Oct;184:762-773
pubmed: 28641228
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Apr 16;47(8):3548-62
pubmed: 23521068
Sci Total Environ. 2007 Oct 1;384(1-3):1-35
pubmed: 17588646
Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(15):8588-602
pubmed: 24968074
J Environ Manage. 2015 Feb 1;149:193-208
pubmed: 25463583
Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):987-992
pubmed: 29853680

Auteurs

Céline Gentil-Sergent (C)

CIRAD, HortSys, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
CIRAD, UPR HortSys, ELSA, Le Lamentin, Martinique, France.

Claudine Basset-Mens (C)

CIRAD, HortSys, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
CIRAD, UPR HortSys, ELSA, Montpellier, France.

Christel Renaud-Gentié (C)

USC GRAPPE, ESA-INRAe, Angers, France.

Charles Mottes (C)

CIRAD, HortSys, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
CIRAD, UPR HortSys, ELSA, Le Lamentin, Martinique, France.

Carlos Melero (C)

Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.

Arthur Launay (A)

CIRAD, HortSys, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
CIRAD, UPR HortSys, ELSA, Le Lamentin, Martinique, France.

Peter Fantke (P)

Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Genome, Bacterial Virulence Phylogeny Genomics Plant Diseases
Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal
Cameroon Humans Uranium Trace Elements Environmental Monitoring

Classifications MeSH