Understanding the role of the paramedic in primary care: a realist review.

Additional roles Allied health personnel Ambulatory care Extended roles Paramedic Primary health care Realist review Urgent care

Journal

BMC medicine
ISSN: 1741-7015
Titre abrégé: BMC Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190723

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 06 2021
Historique:
received: 22 04 2021
accepted: 28 05 2021
entrez: 25 6 2021
pubmed: 26 6 2021
medline: 16 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Since 2002, paramedics have been working in primary care within the United Kingdom (UK), a transition also mirrored within Australia, Canada and the USA. Recent recommendations to improve UK NHS workforce capacities have led to a major push to increase the numbers of paramedics recruited into primary care. However, gaps exist in the evidence base regarding how and why these changes would work, for whom, in what context and to what extent. To understand the ways in which paramedics impact (or not) the primary care workforce, we conducted a realist review. A realist approach aims to provide causal explanations through the generation and articulation of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. Our search of electronic databases was supplemented with Google and citation checking to locate grey literature including news items and workforce reports. Included documents were from the UK, Australia, Canada and the Americas-countries within which the paramedic role within primary care is well established. Our searches resulted in 205 included documents, from which data were extracted to produce context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) within a final programme theory. Our results outline that paramedics are more likely to be effective in contributing to primary care workforces when they are supported to expand their existing role through formal education and clinical supervision. We also found that unless paramedics were fully integrated into primary care services, they did not experience the socialisation needed to build trusting relationships with patients or physicians. Indeed, for patients to accept paramedics in primary care, their role and its implications for their care should be outlined by a trusted source. Our realist review highlights the complexity surrounding the introduction of paramedics into primary care roles. As well as offering an insight into understanding the paramedic professional identity, we also discuss the range of expectations this professional group will face in the transition to primary care. These expectations come from patients, general practitioners (family physicians) and paramedics themselves. This review is the first to offer insight into understanding the impact paramedics may have on the international primary care workforce and shaping how they might be optimally deployed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Since 2002, paramedics have been working in primary care within the United Kingdom (UK), a transition also mirrored within Australia, Canada and the USA. Recent recommendations to improve UK NHS workforce capacities have led to a major push to increase the numbers of paramedics recruited into primary care. However, gaps exist in the evidence base regarding how and why these changes would work, for whom, in what context and to what extent. To understand the ways in which paramedics impact (or not) the primary care workforce, we conducted a realist review.
METHODS
A realist approach aims to provide causal explanations through the generation and articulation of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. Our search of electronic databases was supplemented with Google and citation checking to locate grey literature including news items and workforce reports. Included documents were from the UK, Australia, Canada and the Americas-countries within which the paramedic role within primary care is well established.
RESULTS
Our searches resulted in 205 included documents, from which data were extracted to produce context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) within a final programme theory. Our results outline that paramedics are more likely to be effective in contributing to primary care workforces when they are supported to expand their existing role through formal education and clinical supervision. We also found that unless paramedics were fully integrated into primary care services, they did not experience the socialisation needed to build trusting relationships with patients or physicians. Indeed, for patients to accept paramedics in primary care, their role and its implications for their care should be outlined by a trusted source.
CONCLUSIONS
Our realist review highlights the complexity surrounding the introduction of paramedics into primary care roles. As well as offering an insight into understanding the paramedic professional identity, we also discuss the range of expectations this professional group will face in the transition to primary care. These expectations come from patients, general practitioners (family physicians) and paramedics themselves. This review is the first to offer insight into understanding the impact paramedics may have on the international primary care workforce and shaping how they might be optimally deployed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34167541
doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02019-z
pii: 10.1186/s12916-021-02019-z
pmc: PMC8229679
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

145

Références

Br J Gen Pract. 2020 May 28;70(695):e421-e426
pubmed: 32424047
Popul Health Manag. 2019 Jun;22(3):213-222
pubmed: 30614761
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1751-1755
pubmed: 28453610
J R Soc Med. 2018 Jun;111(6):195-198
pubmed: 29672202
J Interprof Care. 2021 Mar-Apr;35(2):229-239
pubmed: 32233898
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Sep 1;72(9):2418-2430
pubmed: 28859445
BMJ. 2017 Jul 10;358:j3191
pubmed: 28694250
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb 02;16:39
pubmed: 26842850
Eval Program Plann. 2019 Apr;73:97-110
pubmed: 30578941
Br Paramed J. 2019 Dec 01;4(3):35-42
pubmed: 33447149
CJEM. 2019 Nov;21(6):749-761
pubmed: 30885280
BMC Med. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):49
pubmed: 32164681
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12(2):1978
pubmed: 22497586
BMC Med. 2013 Jan 29;11:21
pubmed: 23360677
Trials. 2019 Jan 23;20(1):75
pubmed: 30674347

Auteurs

Georgette Eaton (G)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. georgette.eaton@phc.ox.ac.uk.

Geoff Wong (G)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Stephanie Tierney (S)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Nia Roberts (N)

Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Veronika Williams (V)

School of Nursing, Nipissing University, North Bay, Canada.

Kamal R Mahtani (KR)

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH