More is More? Total Pancreatectomy for Periampullary Cancer as an Alternative in Patients with High-Risk Pancreatic Anastomosis: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Journal
Annals of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1534-4681
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9420840
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
30
11
2020
accepted:
27
05
2021
pubmed:
26
6
2021
medline:
18
11
2021
entrez:
25
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Postpancreatectomy morbidity remains significant even in high-volume centers and frequently results in delay or suspension of indicated adjuvant oncological treatment. This study investigated the short-term and long-term outcome after primary total pancreatectomy (PTP) and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) or Whipple procedure, with a special focus on administration of adjuvant therapy and oncological survival. Patients who underwent PTP or PPPD/Whipple for periampullary cancer between January 2008 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes. Correspondingly, cases of rescue completion pancreatectomy (RCP) were analyzed. In total, 41 PTP and 343 PPPD/Whipple procedures were performed for periampullary cancer. After propensity score matching, morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) ≥ IIIa, 31.7% vs. 24.4%; p = 0.62) and mortality rates (7.3% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.36) were similar in PTP and PPPD/Whipple. Frequency of adjuvant treatment administration (76.5% vs. 78.4%; p = 0.87), overall survival (513 vs. 652 days; p = 0.47), and progression-free survival (456 vs. 454 days; p = 0.95) did not significantly differ. In turn, after RCP, morbidity (CDC ≥ IIIa, 85%) and mortality (40%) were high, and overall survival was poor (median 104 days). Indicated adjuvant therapy was not administered in 77%. In periampullary cancers, PTP may provide surgical and oncological treatment outcomes comparable with pancreatic head resections and might save patients from RCP. Especially in selected cases with high-risk pancreatic anastomosis or preoperatively impaired glucose tolerance, PTP may provide a safe treatment alternative to pancreatic head resection.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Postpancreatectomy morbidity remains significant even in high-volume centers and frequently results in delay or suspension of indicated adjuvant oncological treatment. This study investigated the short-term and long-term outcome after primary total pancreatectomy (PTP) and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) or Whipple procedure, with a special focus on administration of adjuvant therapy and oncological survival.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients who underwent PTP or PPPD/Whipple for periampullary cancer between January 2008 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes. Correspondingly, cases of rescue completion pancreatectomy (RCP) were analyzed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In total, 41 PTP and 343 PPPD/Whipple procedures were performed for periampullary cancer. After propensity score matching, morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) ≥ IIIa, 31.7% vs. 24.4%; p = 0.62) and mortality rates (7.3% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.36) were similar in PTP and PPPD/Whipple. Frequency of adjuvant treatment administration (76.5% vs. 78.4%; p = 0.87), overall survival (513 vs. 652 days; p = 0.47), and progression-free survival (456 vs. 454 days; p = 0.95) did not significantly differ. In turn, after RCP, morbidity (CDC ≥ IIIa, 85%) and mortality (40%) were high, and overall survival was poor (median 104 days). Indicated adjuvant therapy was not administered in 77%.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In periampullary cancers, PTP may provide surgical and oncological treatment outcomes comparable with pancreatic head resections and might save patients from RCP. Especially in selected cases with high-risk pancreatic anastomosis or preoperatively impaired glucose tolerance, PTP may provide a safe treatment alternative to pancreatic head resection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34169383
doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10292-8
pii: 10.1245/s10434-021-10292-8
pmc: PMC8590996
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8309-8317Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Nimptsch U, Krautz C, Weber GF, Mansky T, Grutzmann R. Nationwide in-hospital mortality following pancreatic surgery in Germany is higher than anticipated. Ann Surg. 2016;264(6):1082–90.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001693
Pulvirenti A, Marchegiani G, Pea A, Allegrini V, Esposito A, Casetti L, Landoni L, Malleo G, Salvia R, Bassi C. Clinical implications of the 2016 international study group on pancreatic surgery definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula on 775 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg. 2018;268(6):1069–75.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002362
Pliam MB, ReMine WH. Further evaluation of total pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 1975;110(5):506–12.
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1975.01360110052010
Passeri MJ, Baker EH, Siddiqui IA, Templin MA, Martinie JB, Vrochides D, Iannitti DA. Total compared with partial pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: assessment of resection margin, readmission rate, and survival from the U.S. National Cancer Database. Curr Oncol. 2019;26(3):e346–56.
doi: 10.3747/co.26.4066
Dresler CM, Fortner JG, McDermott K, Bajorunas DR. Metabolic consequences of (regional) total pancreatectomy. Ann Surg. 1991;214(2):131–40.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199108000-00007
Pezzilli R. Diabetic control after total pancreatectomy. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38(6):420–2.
doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.02.007
de la Iglesia-Garcia D, Huang W, Szatmary P, Baston-Rey I, Gonzalez-Lopez J, Prada-Ramallal G, Mukherjee R, Nunes QM, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Sutton R, et al. Efficacy of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in chronic pancreatitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2017;66(8):1354–5.
pubmed: 27941156
Muller MW, Friess H, Kleeff J, Dahmen R, Wagner M, Hinz U, Breisch-Girbig D, Ceyhan GO, Buchler MW. Is there still a role for total pancreatectomy? Ann Surg. 2007;246(6):966–74 (discussion 974-5).
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815c2ca3
Callery MP, Pratt WB, Kent TS, Chaikof EL, Vollmer CM Jr. A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(1):1–14.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.002
Mungroop TH, van Rijssen LB, van Klaveren D, Smits FJ, van Woerden V, Linnemann RJ, de Pastena M, Klompmaker S, Marchegiani G, Ecker BL, et al. Alternative fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy (a-FRS): design and international external validation. Ann Surg. 2019;269(5):937–43.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002620
Mungroop TH, Klompmaker S, Wellner UF, Steyerberg EW, Coratti A, D’Hondt M, de Pastena M, Dokmak S, Khatov I, Saint-Marc O, et al. Updated Alternative Fistula Risk Score (ua-FRS) to include minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: pan-European Validation. Ann Surg. 2021;273(2):334–40.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003234
Finks JF, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(22):2128–37.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1010705
Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(14):1368–75.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0903048
Lemmens VE, Bosscha K, van der Schelling G, Brenninkmeijer S, Coebergh JW, de Hingh IH. Improving outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through centralization. Br J Surg. 2011;98(10):1455–62.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.7581
Farley DR, Schwall G, Trede M. Completion pancreatectomy for surgical complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 1996;83(2):176–9.
pubmed: 8689156
Smith CD, Sarr MG, vanHeerden JA. Completion pancreatectomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical experience. World J Surg. 1992;16(3):521–4.
doi: 10.1007/BF02104459
Tamijmarane A, Ahmed I, Bhati CS, Mirza DF, Mayer AD, Buckels JA, Bramhall SR. Role of completion pancreatectomy as a damage control option for post-pancreatic surgical complications. Dig Surg. 2006;23(4):229–34.
doi: 10.1159/000095395
Nentwich MF, El Gammal AT, Lemcke T, Ghadban T, Bellon E, Melling N, Bachmann K, Reeh M, Uzunoglu FG, Izbicki JR, et al. Salvage completion pancreatectomies as damage control for post-pancreatic surgery complications: a single-center retrospective analysis. World J Surg. 2015;39(6):1550–6.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-2969-9
Ribero D, Amisano M, Zimmitti G, Giraldi F, Ferrero A, Capussotti L. External tube pancreatostomy reduces the risk of mortality associated with completion pancreatectomy for symptomatic fistulas complicating pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(2):332–8.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2100-6
de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2005;92(9):1117–23.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.5047
van Berge Henegouwen MI, De Wit LT, Van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(1):18–24.
doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(97)00007-0
Crippa S, Tamburrino D, Partelli S, Salvia R, Germenia S, Bassi C, Pederzoli P, Falconi M. Total pancreatectomy: indications, different timing, and perioperative and long-term outcomes. Surgery. 2011;149(1):79–86.
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.04.007
Hartwig W, Gluth A, Hinz U, Bergmann F, Spronk PE, Hackert T, Werner J, Buchler MW. Total pancreatectomy for primary pancreatic neoplasms: renaissance of an unpopular operation. Ann Surg. 2015;261(3):537–46.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000791
Reddy S, Wolfgang CL, Cameron JL, Eckhauser F, Choti MA, Schulick RD, Edil BH, Pawlik TM. Total pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: evaluation of morbidity and long-term survival. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):282–7.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ae9f93
Watanabe Y, Ohtsuka T, Matsunaga T, Kimura H, Tamura K, Ideno N, Aso T, Miyasaka Y, Ueda J, Takahata S, et al. Long-term outcomes after total pancreatectomy: special reference to survivors’ living conditions and quality of life. World J Surg. 2015;39(5):1231–9.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-2948-1
Barbier L, Jamal W, Dokmak S, Aussilhou B, Corcos O, Ruszniewski P, Belghiti J, Sauvanet A. Impact of total pancreatectomy: short- and long-term assessment. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(11):882–92.
doi: 10.1111/hpb.12054
Billings BJ, Christein JD, Harmsen WS, Harrington JR, Chari ST, Que FG, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM, Sarr MG. Quality-of-life after total pancreatectomy: is it really that bad on long-term follow-up? J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(8):1059–66 (discussion 1066–7).
doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.05.014
Pulvirenti A, Pea A, Rezaee N, Gasparini C, Malleo G, Weiss MJ, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, He J, Salvia R. Perioperative outcomes and long-term quality of life after total pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 2019;106(13):1819–28.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11185
Roberts KJ, Blanco G, Webber J, Marudanayagam R, Sutcliffe RP, Muiesan P, Bramhall SR, Isaac J, Mirza DF. How severe is diabetes after total pancreatectomy? A case-matched analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16(9):814–21.
doi: 10.1111/hpb.12203
Wu W, Dodson R, Makary MA, Weiss MJ, Hirose K, Cameron JL, Ahuja N, Pawlik TM, Wolfgang CL, He J. A contemporary evaluation of the cause of death and long-term quality of life after total pancreatectomy. World J Surg. 2016;40(10):2513–8.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3552-8