The Menstrual Disorder of Teenagers (MDOT) Study No. 2: Period ImPact and Pain Assessment (PIPPA) Tool Validation in a Large Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study of Australian Teenagers.


Journal

Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology
ISSN: 1873-4332
Titre abrégé: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9610774

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 25 02 2021
revised: 09 05 2021
accepted: 03 06 2021
pubmed: 26 6 2021
medline: 27 1 2022
entrez: 25 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To validate the Period ImPact and Pain Assessment (PIPPA) self-screening tool for menstrual disturbance in teenagers. Cross-sectional study. Three senior high schools in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Australia. A total of 1066 girls between 15 and 19 years of age. A quantitative paper survey collected self-reports of menstrual bleeding patterns, typical and atypical symptoms, morbidities, and interference with daily activities. Multiple correspondence analysis was used to examine associations between PIPPA questions. Generalized linear models compared total score and subscores by validation criteria: pain, school absence, and body mass index (BMI). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the predictiveness of menstrual disturbance indicators by total PIPPA score. Reports of pain, interference, and concern within the PIPPA items and between both the MDOT and PIPPA questionnaires were significantly correlated (P < .0001). The indicator "missing school" was highly associated (P < .0001) with pain and interference. Obesity (BMI ≥30) was associated with higher PIPPA scores, as was underweight (BMI≤18.4). Where 0 = no disturbance, 5 = high disturbance, aggregated PIPPA scores found 75% scoring 0-2 (out of 5) and 25% scoring 3-5 (257/1037). High scores of 4 or 5 (out of 5) were 7% (72/1037) and 3.7% (38/1037), respectively. PIPPA is a valid screening tool for pain-related menstrual disturbance that affects functioning in young women. PIPPA subdomains of pain/interference have good validity relative to indicators of pain and interference and are responsive to age, BMI, and school absence differences.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34171477
pii: S1083-3188(21)00219-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2021.06.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

30-38

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

M A Parker (MA)

Canberra Endometriosis Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ACT Health, Canberra, ACT, Australia. Electronic address: melissa.parker@act.gov.au.

A L Kent (AL)

Department of Pediatrics, Golisano Children's Hospital, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York; Australian National University, College of Health and Medicine, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

A Sneddon (A)

School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

J Wang (J)

Ocular Genomics Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

B Shadbolt (B)

ACT Centre for Health and Medical Research, ACT Health, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH