Determinants for use of direct-to-consumer telemedicine consultations in primary healthcare-a registry based total population study from Stockholm, Sweden.
Equity
Healthcare utilization
Primary healthcare
Telemedicine
eHealth
Journal
BMC family practice
ISSN: 1471-2296
Titre abrégé: BMC Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967792
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 06 2021
26 06 2021
Historique:
received:
14
01
2021
accepted:
09
06
2021
entrez:
26
6
2021
pubmed:
27
6
2021
medline:
25
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In recent years, telemedicine consultations have evolved as a new form of providing primary healthcare. Telemedicine options can provide benefits to patients in terms of access, reduced travel time and no risk of disease spreading. However, concerns have been raised that access is not equally distributed in the population, which could lead to increased inequality in health. The aim of this paper is to explore the determinants for use of direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine consultations in a setting where telemedicine is included in the publicly funded healthcare system. To investigate factors associated with the use of DTC telemedicine, a database was constructed by linking national and regional registries covering the entire population of Stockholm, Sweden (N = 2.3 million). Logistic regressions were applied to explore the determinants for utilization in 2018. As comparators, face-to-face physician consultations in primary healthcare were included in the study, as well as digi-physical physician consultations, i.e., telemedicine consultations offered by traditional primary healthcare providers also offering face-to-face visits, and telephone consultations by nurses. The determinants for use of DTC telemedicine differed substantially from face-to-face visits but also to some extent from the other telemedicine options. For the DTC telemedicine consultations, the factors associated with higher probability of utilization were younger age, higher educational attainment, higher income and being born in Sweden. In contrast, the main determinants for use of face-to-face visits were higher age, lower educational background and being born outside of Sweden. The use of DTC telemedicine is determined by factors that are generally not associated with greater healthcare need and the distribution raises some concerns about the equity implications. Policy makers aiming to increase the level of telemedicine consultations in healthcare should consider measures to promote access for elderly and individuals born outside of Sweden to ensure that all groups have access to healthcare services according to their needs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In recent years, telemedicine consultations have evolved as a new form of providing primary healthcare. Telemedicine options can provide benefits to patients in terms of access, reduced travel time and no risk of disease spreading. However, concerns have been raised that access is not equally distributed in the population, which could lead to increased inequality in health. The aim of this paper is to explore the determinants for use of direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine consultations in a setting where telemedicine is included in the publicly funded healthcare system.
METHODS
To investigate factors associated with the use of DTC telemedicine, a database was constructed by linking national and regional registries covering the entire population of Stockholm, Sweden (N = 2.3 million). Logistic regressions were applied to explore the determinants for utilization in 2018. As comparators, face-to-face physician consultations in primary healthcare were included in the study, as well as digi-physical physician consultations, i.e., telemedicine consultations offered by traditional primary healthcare providers also offering face-to-face visits, and telephone consultations by nurses.
RESULTS
The determinants for use of DTC telemedicine differed substantially from face-to-face visits but also to some extent from the other telemedicine options. For the DTC telemedicine consultations, the factors associated with higher probability of utilization were younger age, higher educational attainment, higher income and being born in Sweden. In contrast, the main determinants for use of face-to-face visits were higher age, lower educational background and being born outside of Sweden.
CONCLUSION
The use of DTC telemedicine is determined by factors that are generally not associated with greater healthcare need and the distribution raises some concerns about the equity implications. Policy makers aiming to increase the level of telemedicine consultations in healthcare should consider measures to promote access for elderly and individuals born outside of Sweden to ensure that all groups have access to healthcare services according to their needs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34172009
doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01481-1
pii: 10.1186/s12875-021-01481-1
pmc: PMC8233176
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
133Références
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Dec;83(12):901-14
pubmed: 25193501
Manage Sci. 2018 Dec;64(12):5461-5480
pubmed: 33033417
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e26433
pubmed: 33465037
BMJ. 2018 Mar 5;360:k1045
pubmed: 29506990
Pharmacoecon Open. 2018 Sep;2(3):347-354
pubmed: 29623633
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jul;127:134-140
pubmed: 31128825
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Nov 24;21(1):241
pubmed: 33234111
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):154-61
pubmed: 27410924
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 22;7(11):e016901
pubmed: 29167106
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1768-1773
pubmed: 30112737
JAMA. 2016 May 10;315(18):2015-6
pubmed: 27163991
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Jul;19(7):515-9
pubmed: 23682589
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 17;19(2):e35
pubmed: 28213342
Lakartidningen. 2019 Oct 18;116:
pubmed: 31638708
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Dec;37(12):2060-2068
pubmed: 30633679
Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):542-546
pubmed: 28407995
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):1-4
pubmed: 25551523
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e205873
pubmed: 32585018
Telemed J E Health. 2016 Apr;22(4):282-7
pubmed: 26488151