A multi-pronged, antiracist approach to optimize equity in medical school admissions.
Journal
Medical education
ISSN: 1365-2923
Titre abrégé: Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7605655
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
revised:
15
06
2021
received:
27
03
2021
accepted:
21
06
2021
pubmed:
27
6
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
26
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Increasing the number of physicians who identify as an underrepresented minority (URM) has been a focus for decades. Despite the US Department of Health and Human Services establishing The Council on Graduate Medical Education focussing on the underrepresentation of minorities in medicine in 1990, US medical students in 1998-1999 were15.2% URM and twenty years later, URM students comprise only 14.6% of matriculants. This reflected our experience at University of Maryland School of Medicine despite our diverse community where over 60% of the population identify as Black or African-American. We share our strategies to mitigate bias in the admissions process and our resulting outcomes. We implemented multiple interventions including interviewer training, recruitment strategies, holistic screening, changes in the interview process and increased racial, ethnic and gender diversity on our admissions committee. These changes were made over a two-year period initially focussing on the committee, followed by focussed interventions for interviewers. With these interventions, we demonstrated an improvement in the number of URM applicants that matriculated. In 2019, we had the first class that was in which no one ethnicity or race comprised the majority of the class, with 54% of matriculants identifying as students of colour. In 2020, in addition to sustaining a majority of the class identifying as students of colour, the proportion of URM students increased from 10%-13% for the preceding 3 years, to 24% of the entering class. The number of physicians who identify as URM must be increased for the benefit of our patients and health care system. Unconscious bias training for interviewers, focused recruitment strategies, holistic screening deemphasising the MCAT, blinding interviewers to MCAT scores and GPA, and increasing admissions committee diversity are five concrete steps that yielded the desired outcome of increasing URM representation among our medical school matriculants.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Increasing the number of physicians who identify as an underrepresented minority (URM) has been a focus for decades. Despite the US Department of Health and Human Services establishing The Council on Graduate Medical Education focussing on the underrepresentation of minorities in medicine in 1990, US medical students in 1998-1999 were15.2% URM and twenty years later, URM students comprise only 14.6% of matriculants. This reflected our experience at University of Maryland School of Medicine despite our diverse community where over 60% of the population identify as Black or African-American. We share our strategies to mitigate bias in the admissions process and our resulting outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
We implemented multiple interventions including interviewer training, recruitment strategies, holistic screening, changes in the interview process and increased racial, ethnic and gender diversity on our admissions committee. These changes were made over a two-year period initially focussing on the committee, followed by focussed interventions for interviewers.
RESULTS
RESULTS
With these interventions, we demonstrated an improvement in the number of URM applicants that matriculated. In 2019, we had the first class that was in which no one ethnicity or race comprised the majority of the class, with 54% of matriculants identifying as students of colour. In 2020, in addition to sustaining a majority of the class identifying as students of colour, the proportion of URM students increased from 10%-13% for the preceding 3 years, to 24% of the entering class.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The number of physicians who identify as URM must be increased for the benefit of our patients and health care system. Unconscious bias training for interviewers, focused recruitment strategies, holistic screening deemphasising the MCAT, blinding interviewers to MCAT scores and GPA, and increasing admissions committee diversity are five concrete steps that yielded the desired outcome of increasing URM representation among our medical school matriculants.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1376-1382Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Razack S, Hodges B, Steinert Y, et al. Seeking inclusion in an exclusive process: discourses of medical school student selection. Med Educ. 2015;49(1):36-47.
Larkins S, Michielsen K, Iputo J, et al. Impact of selection strategies on representation of underserved populations and intention to practise: international findings. Med Educ. 2015;49(1):60-72.
AAMC diversity in medicine facts and figures: 2019; https://www.aamc.org/datareports/workforce/report/diversitymedicine-factsand-figures-2019. Accessed June 14, 2021.
U.S. Census Bureau 2019: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/RHI225219 Accessed June 15, 2021.
Girotti JA, Park YS, Tekian A. Ensuring a fair and equitable selection of students to serve society's health care needs. Med Educ. 2015;49(1):84-92.
Taylor S, Jacobelli F, Luedke T, et al. Improving health care career pipeline programs for underrepresented students: program design that makes a difference. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):113-122.
Witzburg RA, Sondheimer HM. Holistic review-shaping the medical profession one applicant at a time. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(17):1565-1567.
Diaz T, Huerto R, Weiss J. Making merit just in medical school admissions. AMA J Ethics. 2021;23(3):E223-228.
Heller A. Diversity in the Medical Workforce: Are We Making Progress?. The King's Fund; 2021. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/blog/2020/02/diversity-medical-workforce-progress. Accessed June 14, 2021
Medical schools council selection alliance report 2019. https://www.medschools.ac.uk/media/2608/selection-alliance-2019-report.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2021.
Grabowski CJ. Impact of holistic review on student interview pool diversity. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018;23(3):487-498.
Talamantes E, Henderson M, Fancher T, Fitzhugh M. Closing the gap - making medical school admissions more equitable. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(9):803-805.
Emery CR, Boatright D, Culbreath K. Stat! An action plan for replacing the broken system of recruitment and retention of underrepresented minorities in medicine. NAM Perspectives. Discussion Paper, National Academy of Medicine, Washington, DC; 2018. https://nam.edu/stat-an-action-plan-for-replacing-the-broken-system-of-recruitment-and-retention-of-underrepresented-minorities-in-medicine/. Accessed June 14, 2021.
Burch VC. Medical school admissions: where to next? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14(2):153-157.
Capers Q, Clinchot D, McDougle L, Greenwald AG. Implicit racial bias in medical school admissions. Acad Med. 2017;92(3):365-369.
Staats C, Dandar V, St. Cloud T, Wright RA. Proceedings of the Diversity and Inclusion Innovation Forum: Unconscious Bias in Academic Medicine-How the Prejudices We don't Know We have Affect Medical Education, Medical Careers, and Patient Health. Washington, DC: AAMC; 2017.
AAMC proceedings of the diversity and inclusion innovation forum: unconscious bias in academic medicine 2017; https://store.aamc.org/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/168/. Accessed June 14, 2021.
AAMC 2020 MCAT validity report. https://www.aamc.org/media/38496/download. Accessed June 14, 2021.
AAMC roadmap to diversity: integrating holistic review practices into medical school admission processes; https://store.aamc.org/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/195/. Accessed June 14, 2021.
Nakae S, Porfeli E, Davis D, et al. Enrollment management in undergraduate medical school admissions: a complementary framework to holistic review for increasing diversity in medicine. Acad Med. 2021;96(4):501-506.
Capers Q. To reduce health-care disparities we must address biases in medical school admissions. The Hill 2018; https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/383154-to-reduce-health-care-disparities-we-must-address-biases-in-medical-school. Accessed June 14, 2021.
Julian ER. Validity of the Medical College Admission Test for predicting medical school performance. Acad Med. 2005;80(10):910-917.
Violato C, Gauer J, Violato E, Patel D. A study of the validity of the new MCAT exam. Acad Med. 2020;95(3):396-400.
Gay SE, Santen S, Mangrulkar R, et al. The influence of MCAT and GPA preadmission academic metrics on interview scores. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018;23(1):151-158.
Lucey CR, Saguil A. The consequences of structural racism on MCAT scores and medical school admissions: the past is prologue. Acad Med. 2020;95(3):351-356.
Wang NC. Diversity, inclusion, and equity: evolution of race and ethnicity considerations for the cardiology workforce in the United States of America from 1969 to 2019. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(7):e015959.
AAMC addressing and eliminating racism at the AAMC and beyond. 2021; https://www.aamc.org/addressing-and-eliminating-racism-aamc-and-beyond. Accessed June 14, 2021.