Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study.
cancer of the esophagogastric junction
fourth line
metastatic gastric cancer
overall survival
third line
trifluridine/tipiracil
Journal
ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
received:
20
04
2021
revised:
01
06
2021
accepted:
02
06
2021
pubmed:
28
6
2021
medline:
30
10
2021
entrez:
27
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. In the TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in heavily pre-treated patients. This unplanned, exploratory subgroup analysis of the TAGS study aimed to clarify outcomes when FTD/TPI was used as third-line (3L) treatment and fourth- or later-line (4L+) treatment. Patients were divided into a 3L group (126 and 64 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively) and 4L+ group (211 and 106 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively). Endpoints included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) deterioration to ≥2, and safety. Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between FTD/TPI and placebo for 3L and 4L+ treatment. Median OS (mOS) for FTD/TPI versus placebo was: 6.8 versus 3.2 months {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.68 (0.47-0.97), P = 0.0318} in the 3L group; and 5.2 versus 3.7 months [0.73 (0.55-0.95), P = 0.0192] in the 4L+ group. Median PFS for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 3.1 versus 1.9 months [0.54 (0.38-0.77), P = 0.0004] in the 3L group; and 1.9 versus 1.8 months [0.57 (0.44-0.74), P < 0.0001] in the 4L+ group. Time to deterioration of ECOG PS to ≥2 for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 4.8 versus 2.0 months [HR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.42-0.86), P = 0.0049] in the 3L group; and 4.0 versus 2.5 months [0.75 (0.57-0.98), P = 0.0329] in the 4L+ group. The safety of FTD/TPI was consistent in all subgroups. This analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in patients with GC/EGJ in third and later lines with a survival benefit that seems slightly superior in 3L treatment. When FTD/TPI is taken in 3L as recommended in the international guidelines, physicians can expect to provide patients with an mOS of 6.8 months.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. In the TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in heavily pre-treated patients. This unplanned, exploratory subgroup analysis of the TAGS study aimed to clarify outcomes when FTD/TPI was used as third-line (3L) treatment and fourth- or later-line (4L+) treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients were divided into a 3L group (126 and 64 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively) and 4L+ group (211 and 106 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively). Endpoints included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) deterioration to ≥2, and safety.
RESULTS
Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between FTD/TPI and placebo for 3L and 4L+ treatment. Median OS (mOS) for FTD/TPI versus placebo was: 6.8 versus 3.2 months {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.68 (0.47-0.97), P = 0.0318} in the 3L group; and 5.2 versus 3.7 months [0.73 (0.55-0.95), P = 0.0192] in the 4L+ group. Median PFS for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 3.1 versus 1.9 months [0.54 (0.38-0.77), P = 0.0004] in the 3L group; and 1.9 versus 1.8 months [0.57 (0.44-0.74), P < 0.0001] in the 4L+ group. Time to deterioration of ECOG PS to ≥2 for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 4.8 versus 2.0 months [HR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.42-0.86), P = 0.0049] in the 3L group; and 4.0 versus 2.5 months [0.75 (0.57-0.98), P = 0.0329] in the 4L+ group. The safety of FTD/TPI was consistent in all subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in patients with GC/EGJ in third and later lines with a survival benefit that seems slightly superior in 3L treatment. When FTD/TPI is taken in 3L as recommended in the international guidelines, physicians can expect to provide patients with an mOS of 6.8 months.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34175675
pii: S2059-7029(21)00161-7
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100200
pmc: PMC8253956
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Pyrrolidines
0
Uracil
56HH86ZVCT
tipiracil
NGO10K751P
Thymine
QR26YLT7LT
Trifluridine
RMW9V5RW38
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100200Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure JT: Consulting: Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Biocartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharma, Foundation Medicine, Genentech, Genmab, HalioDx, Halozyme, Imugene, Inflection Biosciences, Ipsen, Kura Oncology, Lilly, MSD, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Merus, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, ProteoDesign, Rafael Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Servier, Symphogen, Taiho Pharmaceutical, VCN Biosciences. KS: Consulting/honoraria/research funding: Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, BMS, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Lilly, Mediscience Planning, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Yakult Pharmaceutical. AZ: Consulting/honoraria/expenses/research funding: Amgen, Baxter, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Pierre Fabre, Havas Life, Alira Health, Zymeworks. TD: Consulting/honoraria/research funding: Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly Japan, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Oncolys BioPharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Otsuka, Pfizer, Quintiles, Rakuten Medical, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda. SL: Consulting/expenses/speaker: Amgen, BMS, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier. EVC: Consulting/research funding: Amgen, Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biocartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Halozyme, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Merck KGaA, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Servier, Sirtex Medical, Taiho Pharmaceutical. LF: Consulting/honoraria/expenses/research funding: Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Lilly, MSD. DVTC: Consulting/honoraria/speaker: Amgen, Astella Pharma, BMS, Five Prime Therapeutics, Foundation Medicine, Genentech/Roche, Guardant Health, Lilly, Merck, Seattle Genetics, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Tempus. RF, SRM, and PA: Employees of Servier. H-TA: Consulting/honoraria/research funding: Bayer, BeiGene, Bicycle Therapeutics, Guardant Health, iOncologi, Merck KGaA, Roche, Sarah Cannon Research institute, Servier. MA: Consulting/expenses/speaker: Amgen, BMS, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Roche/Genentech, Servier. DHI: Consulting: Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Lilly/ImClone, Merck, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Roche/Genentech, Taiho Pharmaceutical.