Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo for third or later lines of treatment in metastatic gastric cancer: an exploratory subgroup analysis from the TAGS study.

cancer of the esophagogastric junction fourth line metastatic gastric cancer overall survival third line trifluridine/tipiracil

Journal

ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2021
Historique:
received: 20 04 2021
revised: 01 06 2021
accepted: 02 06 2021
pubmed: 28 6 2021
medline: 30 10 2021
entrez: 27 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. In the TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in heavily pre-treated patients. This unplanned, exploratory subgroup analysis of the TAGS study aimed to clarify outcomes when FTD/TPI was used as third-line (3L) treatment and fourth- or later-line (4L+) treatment. Patients were divided into a 3L group (126 and 64 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively) and 4L+ group (211 and 106 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively). Endpoints included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) deterioration to ≥2, and safety. Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between FTD/TPI and placebo for 3L and 4L+ treatment. Median OS (mOS) for FTD/TPI versus placebo was: 6.8 versus 3.2 months {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.68 (0.47-0.97), P = 0.0318} in the 3L group; and 5.2 versus 3.7 months [0.73 (0.55-0.95), P = 0.0192] in the 4L+ group. Median PFS for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 3.1 versus 1.9 months [0.54 (0.38-0.77), P = 0.0004] in the 3L group; and 1.9 versus 1.8 months [0.57 (0.44-0.74), P < 0.0001] in the 4L+ group. Time to deterioration of ECOG PS to ≥2 for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 4.8 versus 2.0 months [HR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.42-0.86), P = 0.0049] in the 3L group; and 4.0 versus 2.5 months [0.75 (0.57-0.98), P = 0.0329] in the 4L+ group. The safety of FTD/TPI was consistent in all subgroups. This analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in patients with GC/EGJ in third and later lines with a survival benefit that seems slightly superior in 3L treatment. When FTD/TPI is taken in 3L as recommended in the international guidelines, physicians can expect to provide patients with an mOS of 6.8 months.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Metastatic gastric cancer and cancer of the esophagogastric junction (GC/EGJ) is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. In the TAGS study, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in heavily pre-treated patients. This unplanned, exploratory subgroup analysis of the TAGS study aimed to clarify outcomes when FTD/TPI was used as third-line (3L) treatment and fourth- or later-line (4L+) treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients were divided into a 3L group (126 and 64 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively) and 4L+ group (211 and 106 in FTD/TPI and placebo arms, respectively). Endpoints included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) deterioration to ≥2, and safety.
RESULTS
Baseline characteristics were generally well balanced between FTD/TPI and placebo for 3L and 4L+ treatment. Median OS (mOS) for FTD/TPI versus placebo was: 6.8 versus 3.2 months {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.68 (0.47-0.97), P = 0.0318} in the 3L group; and 5.2 versus 3.7 months [0.73 (0.55-0.95), P = 0.0192] in the 4L+ group. Median PFS for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 3.1 versus 1.9 months [0.54 (0.38-0.77), P = 0.0004] in the 3L group; and 1.9 versus 1.8 months [0.57 (0.44-0.74), P < 0.0001] in the 4L+ group. Time to deterioration of ECOG PS to ≥2 for FTD/TPI versus placebo was 4.8 versus 2.0 months [HR (95% CI) = 0.60 (0.42-0.86), P = 0.0049] in the 3L group; and 4.0 versus 2.5 months [0.75 (0.57-0.98), P = 0.0329] in the 4L+ group. The safety of FTD/TPI was consistent in all subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI in patients with GC/EGJ in third and later lines with a survival benefit that seems slightly superior in 3L treatment. When FTD/TPI is taken in 3L as recommended in the international guidelines, physicians can expect to provide patients with an mOS of 6.8 months.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34175675
pii: S2059-7029(21)00161-7
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100200
pmc: PMC8253956
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pyrrolidines 0
Uracil 56HH86ZVCT
tipiracil NGO10K751P
Thymine QR26YLT7LT
Trifluridine RMW9V5RW38

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100200

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure JT: Consulting: Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Biocartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharma, Foundation Medicine, Genentech, Genmab, HalioDx, Halozyme, Imugene, Inflection Biosciences, Ipsen, Kura Oncology, Lilly, MSD, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Merus, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, ProteoDesign, Rafael Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Servier, Symphogen, Taiho Pharmaceutical, VCN Biosciences. KS: Consulting/honoraria/research funding: Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, BMS, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Lilly, Mediscience Planning, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Yakult Pharmaceutical. AZ: Consulting/honoraria/expenses/research funding: Amgen, Baxter, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Pierre Fabre, Havas Life, Alira Health, Zymeworks. TD: Consulting/honoraria/research funding: Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas Pharma, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly Japan, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Oncolys BioPharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Otsuka, Pfizer, Quintiles, Rakuten Medical, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda. SL: Consulting/expenses/speaker: Amgen, BMS, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier. EVC: Consulting/research funding: Amgen, Array BioPharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biocartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Halozyme, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, MSD, Merck KGaA, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Servier, Sirtex Medical, Taiho Pharmaceutical. LF: Consulting/honoraria/expenses/research funding: Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Lilly, MSD. DVTC: Consulting/honoraria/speaker: Amgen, Astella Pharma, BMS, Five Prime Therapeutics, Foundation Medicine, Genentech/Roche, Guardant Health, Lilly, Merck, Seattle Genetics, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Tempus. RF, SRM, and PA: Employees of Servier. H-TA: Consulting/honoraria/research funding: Bayer, BeiGene, Bicycle Therapeutics, Guardant Health, iOncologi, Merck KGaA, Roche, Sarah Cannon Research institute, Servier. MA: Consulting/expenses/speaker: Amgen, BMS, Lilly, MSD Oncology, Roche/Genentech, Servier. DHI: Consulting: Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Lilly/ImClone, Merck, Pieris Pharmaceuticals, Roche/Genentech, Taiho Pharmaceutical.

Auteurs

J Tabernero (J)

Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB-Quiron, UVic-UCC, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: jtabernero@vhio.net.

K Shitara (K)

Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.

A Zaanan (A)

Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, AP-HP Centre, University of Paris, Paris, France.

T Doi (T)

Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.

S Lorenzen (S)

Third Department of Internal Medicine (Hematology/Medical Oncology), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universitaet München, München, Germany.

E Van Cutsem (E)

Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

L Fornaro (L)

Division of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.

D V T Catenacci (DVT)

Gastrointestinal Oncology Program, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, USA.

R Fougeray (R)

Centre of EXcellence Methodology and Valorization of Data (CentEX MVD), Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.

S R Moreno (SR)

Global Medical and Patient Affairs, Les Laboratoires Servier SAS, Suresnes, France.

P Azcue (P)

Global Medical and Patient Affairs, Les Laboratoires Servier SAS, Suresnes, France.

H-T Arkenau (HT)

Drug Development Unit, Sarah Cannon Research Institute UK Limited, London, UK.

M Alsina (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.

D H Ilson (DH)

Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH