Aberrant Morphologic Patterning of Combined Sagittal and Metopic Craniosynostosis.


Journal

The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Sep 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 30 6 2021
medline: 16 9 2021
entrez: 29 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Combined sagittal and metopic craniosynostosis is an uncommon condition that may result in a wide spectrum of cranial morphologies. This occurs as a result of the compound effects of both prematurely fused sutures. The authors present an incidence of sagittal craniosynostosis with a specific altered head morphology, and delayed diagnosis that the authors believe occurred due to structural changes associated with concurrent metopic suture synostosis This patient underscores the limitations of relying on classic diagnostic patterns and highlights the critical role of noninvasive imaging in the diagnosis of craniosynostosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34183627
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007676
pii: 00001665-900000000-92569
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2184-2185

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Références

Chumas PD, Cinalli G, Arnaud E, et al. Classification of previously unclassified cases of craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 1997; 86:177–181.
Greene AK, Mulliken JB, Proctor MR, et al. Phenotypically unusual combined craniosynostoses: presentation and management. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122:853–862.
Shimoji T, Kimura T, Shimoji K, et al. The metopic-sagittal craniosynostosis-report of 35 operative cases. Childs Nerv Syst 2017; 33:1335–1348.
Domeshek LF, Das RR, Van Aalst JA, et al. Influence of metopic suture fusion associated with sagittal synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22:77–83.
David L, Glazier S, Pyle J, et al. Classification system for sagittal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20:279–282.
Hall KM, Besachio DA, Moore MD, et al. Effectiveness of screening for craniosynostosis with ultrasound: a retrospective review. Pediatr Radiol 2017; 47:606–612.
Van der Meulen J, Van der Hulst R, Van Adrichem L, et al. The increase of metopic synostosis: a pan-European observation. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20:283–286.
Vu HL, Panchal J, Parker EE, et al. The timing of physiologic closure of the metopic suture: a review of 159 patients using reconstructed 3D CT scans of the craniofacial region. J Craniofac Surg 2001; 12:527–532.
Cabrejo R, Lacadie C, Chuang C, et al. What is the functional difference between sagittal with metopic and isolated sagittal craniosynotosis? J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30:968–973.
Terner JS, Travieso R, Lee SS, et al. Combined metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis: is it worse than sagittal synostosis alone? Neurosurg Focus 2011; 31:E2.

Auteurs

Jacob Dinis (J)

Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH