Early extubation with immediate non-invasive ventilation versus standard weaning in intubated patients for coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective multicenter study.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 06 2021
28 06 2021
Historique:
received:
24
12
2020
accepted:
16
06
2021
entrez:
29
6
2021
pubmed:
30
6
2021
medline:
9
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In patients intubated for hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) related to novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), we retrospectively compared two weaning strategies, early extubation with immediate non-invasive ventilation (NIV) versus standard weaning encompassing spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), with respect to IMV duration (primary endpoint), extubation failures and reintubations, rate of tracheostomy, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and mortality (additional endpoints). All COVID-19 adult patients, intubated for hypoxemic ARF and subsequently extubated, were enrolled. Patients were included in two groups, early extubation followed by immediate NIV application, and conventionally weaning after passing SBT. 121 patients were enrolled and analyzed, 66 early extubated and 55 conventionally weaned after passing an SBT. IMV duration was 9 [6-11] days in early extubated patients versus 11 [6-15] days in standard weaning group (p = 0.034). Extubation failures [12 (18.2%) vs. 25 (45.5%), p = 0.002] and reintubations [12 (18.2%) vs. 22 (40.0%) p = 0.009] were fewer in early extubation compared to the standard weaning groups, respectively. Rate of tracheostomy, ICU mortality, and ICU length of stay were no different between groups. Compared to standard weaning, early extubation followed by immediate NIV shortened IMV duration and reduced the rate of extubation failure and reintubation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34183764
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92960-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-92960-z
pmc: PMC8239031
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13418Références
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):782-793
pubmed: 32648899
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069
pubmed: 32031570
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jul;46(7):1303-1325
pubmed: 32514598
Eur Respir J. 2020 May 21;55(5):
pubmed: 32265307
JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2175-2182
pubmed: 31184740
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 09;(12):CD004127
pubmed: 24323843
Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Jan-Feb;75(1-2):31-6
pubmed: 18421257
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Jun 9;10(1):78
pubmed: 32519064
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):18-27
pubmed: 29397127
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):270-273
pubmed: 32015507
Eur Respir J. 2007 May;29(5):1033-56
pubmed: 17470624
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Oct;38(10):1599-606
pubmed: 22825283
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Aug;8(8):816-821
pubmed: 32645311
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun 1;195(11):1477-1485
pubmed: 27768396
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jan;45(1):62-71
pubmed: 30535516
Crit Care Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):2465-70
pubmed: 16276167
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020 Aug;35(4):431-433
pubmed: 32423513
JAMA. 2019 Oct 15;322(15):1465-1475
pubmed: 31577036
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul 15;188(2):220-30
pubmed: 23631814
Crit Care. 2013 Mar 04;17(2):R39
pubmed: 23497557
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jun 15;187(12):1294-302
pubmed: 23641924
Eur Respir J. 2017 Aug 31;50(2):
pubmed: 28860265
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2329-2330
pubmed: 32329799