Factors that influence data sharing through data sharing platforms: A qualitative study on the views and experiences of cohort holders and platform developers.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 13 10 2020
accepted: 23 06 2021
entrez: 2 7 2021
pubmed: 3 7 2021
medline: 24 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Infrastructures are being developed to enhance and facilitate the sharing of cohort data internationally. However, empirical studies show that many barriers impede sharing data broadly. Therefore, our aim is to describe the barriers and concerns for the sharing of cohort data, and the implications for data sharing platforms. Seventeen participants involved in developing data sharing platforms or tied to cohorts that are to be submitted to platforms were recruited for semi-structured interviews to share views and experiences regarding data sharing. Credit and recognition, the potential misuse of data, loss of control, lack of resources, socio-cultural factors and ethical and legal barriers are elements that influence decisions on data sharing. Core values underlying these reasons are equality, reciprocity, trust, transparency, gratification and beneficence. Data generators might use data sharing platforms primarily for collaborative modes of working and network building. Data generators might be unwilling to contribute and share for non-collaborative work, or if no financial resources are provided for sharing data.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Infrastructures are being developed to enhance and facilitate the sharing of cohort data internationally. However, empirical studies show that many barriers impede sharing data broadly.
PURPOSE
Therefore, our aim is to describe the barriers and concerns for the sharing of cohort data, and the implications for data sharing platforms.
METHODS
Seventeen participants involved in developing data sharing platforms or tied to cohorts that are to be submitted to platforms were recruited for semi-structured interviews to share views and experiences regarding data sharing.
RESULTS
Credit and recognition, the potential misuse of data, loss of control, lack of resources, socio-cultural factors and ethical and legal barriers are elements that influence decisions on data sharing. Core values underlying these reasons are equality, reciprocity, trust, transparency, gratification and beneficence.
CONCLUSIONS
Data generators might use data sharing platforms primarily for collaborative modes of working and network building. Data generators might be unwilling to contribute and share for non-collaborative work, or if no financial resources are provided for sharing data.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34214146
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254202
pii: PONE-D-20-32174
pmc: PMC8253381
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0254202

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

All authors are involved in the euCanSHare consortium. In that project, the role of the authors is to (a) study incentives for data sharing and the potential interaction with new technologies; (b) interact directly with individual cohorts to assess their reservations for participating; and (c) organize workshops with experts on broader ELSI topics. Additionally, PB sits on the Governance Advisory Group of the EUCAN-Connect consortium. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 27;376(17):1684-1687
pubmed: 28402238
Geo. 2015 Jun 30;2(1):12-16
pubmed: 26435842
F1000Res. 2016 Apr 11;5:632
pubmed: 27158456
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016 Aug;25(4):289-90
pubmed: 27150624
Elife. 2017 Oct 30;6:
pubmed: 29082866
Health Care Women Int. 1992 Jul-Sep;13(3):313-21
pubmed: 1399871
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Jun;88(6):468-9
pubmed: 20539864
Glob Bioeth. 2018 Feb 26;29(1):39-54
pubmed: 29503603
Health Res Policy Syst. 2008 Aug 01;6:8
pubmed: 18673541
Biopreserv Biobank. 2016 Jun;14(3):231-40
pubmed: 27200470
J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44 Suppl 1:103S-107S
pubmed: 1827649
BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 05;14:1144
pubmed: 25377061
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21101
pubmed: 21738610
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 25;10(2):e0118053
pubmed: 25714752
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 May 1;188(5):840-845
pubmed: 30877294
Acad Med. 2001 Feb;76(2):166-72
pubmed: 11158838
N Biotechnol. 2019 Mar 25;49:98-103
pubmed: 30342241
Global Health. 2016 May 06;12(1):17
pubmed: 27154550
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 21;374(3):276-7
pubmed: 26789876
Science. 2020 Mar 20;367(6484):1308-1309
pubmed: 32193313
Wellcome Open Res. 2017 Aug 16;2:63
pubmed: 29018840
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12
pubmed: 14769454
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 26;10(8):e0134826
pubmed: 26308551
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Mar 24;12(3):e1004816
pubmed: 27010398

Auteurs

Thijs Devriendt (T)

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Pascal Borry (P)

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Mahsa Shabani (M)

Faculty of Law and Criminology, Metamedica, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH