Feasibility of ABUS as an Alternative to Handheld Ultrasound for Response Control in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment.


Journal

Clinical breast cancer
ISSN: 1938-0666
Titre abrégé: Clin Breast Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100898731

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2022
Historique:
received: 04 03 2021
revised: 16 05 2021
accepted: 17 05 2021
pubmed: 6 7 2021
medline: 11 3 2022
entrez: 5 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Invenia Automated Breast Ultrasound Screening (ABUS) is indicated as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening in asymptomatic women with high-density breast tissue. ABUS provides time-efficient evaluation of the 3-dimensional recordings within 3 to 6 minutes. The role and advantages of ABUS in everyday clinical practice, especially in routine examination during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), is not clear. The aim of this monocentric, noninterventional retrospective study is to evaluate the use of ABUS in patients who are under NACT treatment for response control. Regular sonographic response check with handheld ultrasound (HHUS) examination and with ABUS were conducted in 83 women who underwent NACT. The response controls were conducted every 3 to 6 weeks during NACT. The handheld sonography was performed with GE Voluson S8. Handheld sonographic measurements and ABUS measurements were compared with the final pathologic tumor size. There was no statistical difference between the measurements with HHUS examination or ABUS compared with final pathologic tumor size (P = .47). The average difference from ABUS measured tumor size to final pathologic tumor size was 9.8 mm. The average difference from handheld measured tumor size to final pathologic tumor size was 9/3 mm. Both the specificity of ABUS and HHUS examination in predicting pathologic complete remission was 100%. ABUS seems to be a suitable method to conduct response control in neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment. ABUS may facilitate preoperative planning and offers remarkable time saving for physicians compared with HHUS examination and thus should be considered for clinical practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34219020
pii: S1526-8209(21)00138-5
doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.05.010
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e142-e146

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Maria Eleni Hatzipanagiotou (ME)

University Medical Centre Regensburg, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 93053 Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: mhatzipanagiotou@caritasstjosef.de.

Deborah Huber (D)

University Medical Centre Regensburg, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.

Valeria Gerthofer (V)

University Medical Centre Regensburg, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.

Madeleine Hetterich (M)

University Medical Centre Regensburg, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.

Blanca Roca Ripoll (BR)

University Medical Centre Regensburg, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.

Olaf Ortmann (O)

University Medical Centre Regensburg, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.

Stephan Seitz (S)

University Medical Centre Regensburg, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH