Challenges to implementing electronic trial data collection in primary care: a qualitative study.


Journal

BMC family practice
ISSN: 1471-2296
Titre abrégé: BMC Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967792

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 07 2021
Historique:
received: 01 10 2020
accepted: 23 06 2021
entrez: 7 7 2021
pubmed: 8 7 2021
medline: 25 9 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Within-consultation recruitment to primary care trials is challenging. Ensuring procedures are efficient and self-explanatory is the key to optimising recruitment. Trial recruitment software that integrates with the electronic health record to support and partially automate procedures is becoming more common. If it works well, such software can support greater participation and more efficient trial designs. An innovative electronic trial recruitment and outcomes software was designed to support recruitment to the Runny Ear randomised controlled trial, comparing topical, oral and delayed antibiotic treatment for acute otitis media with discharge in children. A qualitative evaluation investigated the views and experiences of primary care staff using this trial software. Staff were purposively sampled in relation to site, role and whether the practice successfully recruited patients. In-depth interviews were conducted using a flexible topic guide, audio recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed thematically. Sixteen staff were interviewed, including GPs, practice managers, information technology (IT) leads and research staff. GPs wanted trial software that automatically captures patient data. However, the experience of getting the software to work within the limited and complex IT infrastructure of primary care was frustrating and time consuming. Installation was reliant on practice level IT expertise, which varied between practices. Although most had external IT support, this rarely included supported for research IT. Arrangements for approving new software varied across practices and often, but not always, required authorisation from Clinical Commissioning Groups. Primary care IT systems are not solely under the control of individual practices or CCGs or the National Health Service. Rather they are part of a complex system that spans all three and is influenced by semi-autonomous stakeholders operating at different levels. This led to time consuming and sometimes insurmountable barriers to installation at the practice level. These need to be addressed if software supporting efficient research in primary care is to become a reality.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Within-consultation recruitment to primary care trials is challenging. Ensuring procedures are efficient and self-explanatory is the key to optimising recruitment. Trial recruitment software that integrates with the electronic health record to support and partially automate procedures is becoming more common. If it works well, such software can support greater participation and more efficient trial designs. An innovative electronic trial recruitment and outcomes software was designed to support recruitment to the Runny Ear randomised controlled trial, comparing topical, oral and delayed antibiotic treatment for acute otitis media with discharge in children. A qualitative evaluation investigated the views and experiences of primary care staff using this trial software.
METHODS
Staff were purposively sampled in relation to site, role and whether the practice successfully recruited patients. In-depth interviews were conducted using a flexible topic guide, audio recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed thematically.
RESULTS
Sixteen staff were interviewed, including GPs, practice managers, information technology (IT) leads and research staff. GPs wanted trial software that automatically captures patient data. However, the experience of getting the software to work within the limited and complex IT infrastructure of primary care was frustrating and time consuming. Installation was reliant on practice level IT expertise, which varied between practices. Although most had external IT support, this rarely included supported for research IT. Arrangements for approving new software varied across practices and often, but not always, required authorisation from Clinical Commissioning Groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Primary care IT systems are not solely under the control of individual practices or CCGs or the National Health Service. Rather they are part of a complex system that spans all three and is influenced by semi-autonomous stakeholders operating at different levels. This led to time consuming and sometimes insurmountable barriers to installation at the practice level. These need to be addressed if software supporting efficient research in primary care is to become a reality.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34229624
doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01498-6
pii: 10.1186/s12875-021-01498-6
pmc: PMC8259773
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

147

Références

Nurse Res. 2006 Jul 1;13(4):84
pubmed: 27702218
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:961526
pubmed: 26539547
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Sep 25;17(1):139
pubmed: 28946908
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jul;18(43):1-146
pubmed: 25011568
Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):e73-86
pubmed: 23146626
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Mar;56(524):170-5
pubmed: 16536956
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jul;83(7):e12-22
pubmed: 24444700
Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):463
pubmed: 32493407
Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(2):115-23
pubmed: 22824564
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:86-97
pubmed: 27919399
BMJ. 2010 May 18;340:c2096
pubmed: 20483949
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 01;19(11):e367
pubmed: 29092808
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Oct;106:17-24
pubmed: 28870379
Lancet. 2005 Feb 12-18;365(9459):579-87
pubmed: 15708101
Health Policy Plan. 2010 Mar;25(2):104-11
pubmed: 19917651
BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):251-3
pubmed: 7627048
Res Nurs Health. 1995 Apr;18(2):179-83
pubmed: 7899572
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Feb;60(571):101-5
pubmed: 20132703
Fam Pract. 2007 Jun;24(3):269-75
pubmed: 17504773
Ment Health Fam Med. 2013 Sep;10(3):163-73
pubmed: 24427184
Fam Pract. 2006 Apr;23(2):253-63
pubmed: 16368704
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970

Auteurs

Christie Cabral (C)

Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. chrisitie.cabral@bristol.ac.uk.

Kathryn Curtis (K)

Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

Vasa Curcin (V)

School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Addison House 3.07, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK.

Jesús Domínguez (J)

School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Addison House 3.07, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK.

Vibhore Prasad (V)

School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Addison House 3.07, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 1UL, UK.

Anne Schilder (A)

NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre and evidENT, UCL Ear Institute, 91 Gower Street, London, WC1E 6AB, UK.

Nicholas Turner (N)

Bristol Randomised Trial Collaboration (BRTC), Part of the Bristol Trial Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS82PS, UK.

Scott Wilkes (S)

School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sciences Complex, City Campus, Chester Road, Sunderland, SR1 3SD, UK.

Jodi Taylor (J)

Bristol Randomised Trial Collaboration (BRTC), Part of the Bristol Trial Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS82PS, UK.

Sarah Gallagher (S)

The Portland Practice, St Pauls Medical Centre, 121 Swindon Road, Cheltenham, GL50 4DP, Gloucestershire, UK.

Paul Little (P)

Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University Of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

Brendan Delaney (B)

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.

Michael Moore (M)

Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University Of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

Alastair D Hay (AD)

Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

Jeremy Horwood (J)

Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH