Views on online self-help programmes from people with eating disorders and their carers in UK.


Journal

European journal of public health
ISSN: 1464-360X
Titre abrégé: Eur J Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9204966

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 07 2021
Historique:
entrez: 9 7 2021
pubmed: 10 7 2021
medline: 17 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Digitalizing the healthcare system has been declared a priority by the UK government. People with eating disorders (EDs), especially those with bulimia nervosa (BN) or binge eating disorder (BED), and ED carers may benefit from online self-help programmes, due to the shame and stigma associated with EDs and barriers in accessing treatment, skills-training or support. Qualitative studies are needed to explore stakeholders' needs, attitudes to and views about online self-help, to optimize intervention design and delivery. Focus groups and telephone interviews were conducted with people with BN or BED, and carers of people with anorexia nervosa, between March and September 2018 in the UK. People with EDs and carers perceived online self-help positively in the context of barriers to seeking and accessing treatment and support, despite some seeing it as inferior to face-to-face support. Most reported little experience with online interventions. Participants thought the disadvantages of online interventions could be overcome by reminders, progress summaries, regular engagement and engaging with peers. Receiving guidance was seen as an important functionality in the intervention by people with EDs. People with EDs and their carers are aware of the potential benefits of online self-help despite having little experience with this form of intervention. A stepped-care approach that utilizes technology-based interventions as a first step and makes such interventions available directly to the consumer may fit the attitudes and needs of stakeholders. The study provides a foundation for future research on design and delivery of ED online self-help.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Digitalizing the healthcare system has been declared a priority by the UK government. People with eating disorders (EDs), especially those with bulimia nervosa (BN) or binge eating disorder (BED), and ED carers may benefit from online self-help programmes, due to the shame and stigma associated with EDs and barriers in accessing treatment, skills-training or support. Qualitative studies are needed to explore stakeholders' needs, attitudes to and views about online self-help, to optimize intervention design and delivery.
METHODS
Focus groups and telephone interviews were conducted with people with BN or BED, and carers of people with anorexia nervosa, between March and September 2018 in the UK.
RESULTS
People with EDs and carers perceived online self-help positively in the context of barriers to seeking and accessing treatment and support, despite some seeing it as inferior to face-to-face support. Most reported little experience with online interventions. Participants thought the disadvantages of online interventions could be overcome by reminders, progress summaries, regular engagement and engaging with peers. Receiving guidance was seen as an important functionality in the intervention by people with EDs.
CONCLUSIONS
People with EDs and their carers are aware of the potential benefits of online self-help despite having little experience with this form of intervention. A stepped-care approach that utilizes technology-based interventions as a first step and makes such interventions available directly to the consumer may fit the attitudes and needs of stakeholders. The study provides a foundation for future research on design and delivery of ED online self-help.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34240155
pii: 6317467
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab046
pmc: PMC8495677
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

i88-i93

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.

Références

Eat Weight Disord. 2011 Jun;16(2):e93-e101
pubmed: 21989103
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2016 Jan;44(1):65-78
pubmed: 25430776
Eat Disord. 2005 Jul-Sep;13(4):327-44
pubmed: 16864348
Int J Eat Disord. 2013 Sep;46(6):539-52
pubmed: 23674367
Internet Interv. 2018 Feb 22;16:76-85
pubmed: 30775267
Psychol Med. 2011 Dec;41(12):2581-91
pubmed: 21733215
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Jul;31(5):727-35
pubmed: 21501580
Internet Interv. 2018 Feb 26;16:26-34
pubmed: 30775262
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 31;17(3):e85
pubmed: 25840591
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Apr 11;14:109
pubmed: 24725765
Int J Eat Disord. 2013 Sep;46(6):634-8
pubmed: 23712500
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Mar 15;15(3):e46
pubmed: 23502689
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2017 Nov;25(6):551-561
pubmed: 28948663
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016 Apr;18(4):42
pubmed: 26946513
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 13;10(2):e0116622
pubmed: 25679228
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Jul 7;31(31 Suppl 1):i48-i54
pubmed: 34240158

Auteurs

See Heng Yim (SH)

Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Lucy Spencer (L)

Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Gemma Gordon (G)

Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Karina L Allen (KL)

Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
The Eating Disorders Service, Maudsley Hospital, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Peter Musiat (P)

Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Ulrike Schmidt (U)

Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
The Eating Disorders Service, Maudsley Hospital, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH