Effect of BG-Lures on the Male Aedes (Diptera: Culicidae) Sound Trap Capture Rates.
Aedes aegypti
Aedes albopictus
dengue
mosquito trap
sound lure
Journal
Journal of medical entomology
ISSN: 1938-2928
Titre abrégé: J Med Entomol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0375400
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 11 2021
09 11 2021
Historique:
received:
02
04
2021
pubmed:
10
7
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
9
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
With global expansion of the two main vectors of dengue, Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, Diptera: Culicidae) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse, Diptera: Culicidae), there is a need to further develop cost-effective and user-friendly surveillance tools to monitor the population dynamics of these species. The abundance of Ae. aegypti and Ae. Albopictus, and associated bycatch captured by Male Aedes Sound Traps (MASTs) and BG-Sentinel (BGS) traps that were unbaited or baited with BG-Lures were compared in Cairns, Australia and Madang, Papua New Guinea. Mean male Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus catch rates in MASTs did not significantly differ when deployed with BG-Lures. Similarly, males of both these species were not sampled at statistically different rates in BGS traps with or without BG-Lures. However, MASTs with BG-Lures caught significantly less male Ae. aegypti than BGS traps baited with BG-Lures in Cairns, and MASTs without BG-Lures caught significantly more male Ae. albopictus than BGS traps without BG-Lures in Madang. Additionally, BG-Lures significantly increased female Ae. aegypti catch rates in BGS traps in Cairns. Lastly, bycatch capture rates in BGS traps were not significantly influenced by the addition of the BG-Lures. While this study provides useful information regarding the surveillance of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus in these locations, further development and investigation is required to successfully integrate an olfactory lure into the MAST system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34240181
pii: 6317590
doi: 10.1093/jme/tjab121
pmc: PMC8577766
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2425-2431Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.
Références
J Med Entomol. 2017 Sep 1;54(5):1415-1419
pubmed: 28399312
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Jul 3;12(1):333
pubmed: 31269965
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Mar 22;5(3):e988
pubmed: 21445333
Nat Microbiol. 2019 May;4(5):854-863
pubmed: 30833735
Med Vet Entomol. 2014 Dec;28(4):457-60
pubmed: 24797695
J Med Entomol. 2016 Jan;53(1):245-8
pubmed: 26502754
Parasit Vectors. 2014 Dec 11;7:580
pubmed: 25499569
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Apr;38(4):482-492
pubmed: 32265562
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Mar 6;13(1):121
pubmed: 32143711
J Med Entomol. 2021 Mar 12;58(2):708-716
pubmed: 33179740
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2013 Dec;29(4):358-68
pubmed: 24551969
J Med Entomol. 2013 Jul;50(4):723-30
pubmed: 23926769
J Med Entomol. 2016 Mar;53(2):460-5
pubmed: 26581402
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2015 Dec;31(4):384-7
pubmed: 26675464
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2007 Mar;23(1):11-7
pubmed: 17536362
Elife. 2015 Jun 30;4:e08347
pubmed: 26126267
J Med Entomol. 2020 Sep 7;57(5):1539-1549
pubmed: 32363393
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 22;14(2):e0212688
pubmed: 30794670
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2019 Mar;35(1):32-39
pubmed: 31442187
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015 Oct;27(7):705-14
pubmed: 25186807
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2017 Jun;33(2):108-115
pubmed: 28590215
Gates Open Res. 2019 Sep 26;3:1547
pubmed: 31667465
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Feb 25;15(2):e0009061
pubmed: 33630829
PLoS Pathog. 2010 Aug 05;6(8):e1001000
pubmed: 20700451
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jan;102(1):223-231
pubmed: 31769394
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2006 Dec;22(4):641-7
pubmed: 17304931
Acta Trop. 2014 Apr;132 Suppl:S12-9
pubmed: 24308996
J Med Entomol. 2021 Jan 12;58(1):408-415
pubmed: 32740655
Acta Trop. 2016 Dec;164:448-454
pubmed: 27609638
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Jul 30;12(1):382
pubmed: 31362759