Genomics-informed responses in the elimination of COVID-19 in Victoria, Australia: an observational, genomic epidemiological study.
Journal
The Lancet. Public health
ISSN: 2468-2667
Titre abrégé: Lancet Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101699003
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
received:
01
05
2021
revised:
26
05
2021
accepted:
01
06
2021
pubmed:
13
7
2021
medline:
5
8
2021
entrez:
12
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A cornerstone of Australia's ability to control COVID-19 has been effective border control with an extensive supervised quarantine programme. However, a rapid recrudescence of COVID-19 was observed in the state of Victoria in June, 2020. We aim to describe the genomic findings that located the source of this second wave and show the role of genomic epidemiology in the successful elimination of COVID-19 for a second time in Australia. In this observational, genomic epidemiological study, we did genomic sequencing of all laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 diagnosed in Victoria, Australia between Jan 25, 2020, and Jan 31, 2021. We did phylogenetic analyses, genomic cluster discovery, and integrated results with epidemiological data (detailed information on demographics, risk factors, and exposure) collected via interview by the Victorian Government Department of Health. Genomic transmission networks were used to group multiple genomic clusters when epidemiological and genomic data suggested they arose from a single importation event and diversified within Victoria. To identify transmission of emergent lineages between Victoria and other states or territories in Australia, all publicly available SARS-CoV-2 sequences uploaded before Feb 11, 2021, were obtained from the national sequence sharing programme AusTrakka, and epidemiological data were obtained from the submitting laboratories. We did phylodynamic analyses to estimate the growth rate, doubling time, and number of days from the first local infection to the collection of the first sequenced genome for the dominant local cluster, and compared our growth estimates to previously published estimates from a similar growth phase of lineage B.1.1.7 (also known as the Alpha variant) in the UK. Between Jan 25, 2020, and Jan 31, 2021, there were 20 451 laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Victoria, Australia, of which 15 431 were submitted for sequencing, and 11 711 met all quality control metrics and were included in our analysis. We identified 595 genomic clusters, with a median of five cases per cluster (IQR 2-11). Overall, samples from 11 503 (98·2%) of 11 711 cases clustered with another sample in Victoria, either within a genomic cluster or transmission network. Genomic analysis revealed that 10 426 cases, including 10 416 (98·4%) of 10 584 locally acquired cases, diagnosed during the second wave (between June and October, 2020) were derived from a single incursion from hotel quarantine, with the outbreak lineage (transmission network G, lineage D.2) rapidly detected in other Australian states and territories. Phylodynamic analyses indicated that the epidemic growth rate of the outbreak lineage in Victoria during the initial growth phase (samples collected between June 4 and July 9, 2020; 47·4 putative transmission events, per branch, per year [1/years; 95% credible interval 26·0-85·0]), was similar to that of other reported variants, such as B.1.1.7 in the UK (mean approximately 71·5 1/years). Strict interventions were implemented, and the outbreak lineage has not been detected in Australia since Oct 29, 2020. Subsequent cases represented independent international or interstate introductions, with limited local spread. Our study highlights how rapid escalation of clonal outbreaks can occur from a single incursion. However, strict quarantine measures and decisive public health responses to emergent cases are effective, even with high epidemic growth rates. Real-time genomic surveillance can alter the way in which public health agencies view and respond to COVID-19 outbreaks. The Victorian Government, the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, and the Medical Research Future Fund.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A cornerstone of Australia's ability to control COVID-19 has been effective border control with an extensive supervised quarantine programme. However, a rapid recrudescence of COVID-19 was observed in the state of Victoria in June, 2020. We aim to describe the genomic findings that located the source of this second wave and show the role of genomic epidemiology in the successful elimination of COVID-19 for a second time in Australia.
METHODS
In this observational, genomic epidemiological study, we did genomic sequencing of all laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 diagnosed in Victoria, Australia between Jan 25, 2020, and Jan 31, 2021. We did phylogenetic analyses, genomic cluster discovery, and integrated results with epidemiological data (detailed information on demographics, risk factors, and exposure) collected via interview by the Victorian Government Department of Health. Genomic transmission networks were used to group multiple genomic clusters when epidemiological and genomic data suggested they arose from a single importation event and diversified within Victoria. To identify transmission of emergent lineages between Victoria and other states or territories in Australia, all publicly available SARS-CoV-2 sequences uploaded before Feb 11, 2021, were obtained from the national sequence sharing programme AusTrakka, and epidemiological data were obtained from the submitting laboratories. We did phylodynamic analyses to estimate the growth rate, doubling time, and number of days from the first local infection to the collection of the first sequenced genome for the dominant local cluster, and compared our growth estimates to previously published estimates from a similar growth phase of lineage B.1.1.7 (also known as the Alpha variant) in the UK.
FINDINGS
Between Jan 25, 2020, and Jan 31, 2021, there were 20 451 laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Victoria, Australia, of which 15 431 were submitted for sequencing, and 11 711 met all quality control metrics and were included in our analysis. We identified 595 genomic clusters, with a median of five cases per cluster (IQR 2-11). Overall, samples from 11 503 (98·2%) of 11 711 cases clustered with another sample in Victoria, either within a genomic cluster or transmission network. Genomic analysis revealed that 10 426 cases, including 10 416 (98·4%) of 10 584 locally acquired cases, diagnosed during the second wave (between June and October, 2020) were derived from a single incursion from hotel quarantine, with the outbreak lineage (transmission network G, lineage D.2) rapidly detected in other Australian states and territories. Phylodynamic analyses indicated that the epidemic growth rate of the outbreak lineage in Victoria during the initial growth phase (samples collected between June 4 and July 9, 2020; 47·4 putative transmission events, per branch, per year [1/years; 95% credible interval 26·0-85·0]), was similar to that of other reported variants, such as B.1.1.7 in the UK (mean approximately 71·5 1/years). Strict interventions were implemented, and the outbreak lineage has not been detected in Australia since Oct 29, 2020. Subsequent cases represented independent international or interstate introductions, with limited local spread.
INTERPRETATION
Our study highlights how rapid escalation of clonal outbreaks can occur from a single incursion. However, strict quarantine measures and decisive public health responses to emergent cases are effective, even with high epidemic growth rates. Real-time genomic surveillance can alter the way in which public health agencies view and respond to COVID-19 outbreaks.
FUNDING
The Victorian Government, the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, and the Medical Research Future Fund.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34252365
pii: S2468-2667(21)00133-X
doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00133-X
pmc: PMC8270762
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e547-e556Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests All authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):257-261
pubmed: 32512579
Science. 2021 Feb 12;371(6530):708-712
pubmed: 33419936
Science. 2020 Jul 31;369(6503):582-587
pubmed: 32513865
Euro Surveill. 2021 Jan;26(1):
pubmed: 33413740
Lancet Microbe. 2020 Oct;1(6):e227-e228
pubmed: 32838350
BMJ. 2020 Dec 22;371:m4907
pubmed: 33561814
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 2;73(3):e808-e810
pubmed: 33354719
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;21(1):52-58
pubmed: 33058797
Med J Aust. 2020 Jun;212(10):459-462
pubmed: 32237278
J Infect. 2020 Oct;81(4):621-624
pubmed: 32735893
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 1;11(1):4376
pubmed: 32873808
Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2020 Oct 8;44:
pubmed: 33028181
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Apr 8;15(4):e1006650
pubmed: 30958812
Med J Aust. 2020 Sep;213(5):198-200.e1
pubmed: 32789868
Euro Surveill. 2021 Jan;26(2):
pubmed: 33446304
Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1398-1404
pubmed: 32647358
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 11;11(1):6351
pubmed: 33311501
Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1405-1410
pubmed: 32678356
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 07;8:614945
pubmed: 33365299
Med J Aust. 2021 Oct 4;215(7):320-324
pubmed: 34472122
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;20(11):1263-1272
pubmed: 32679081
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 9;11(1):6272
pubmed: 33298935
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Nov;5(11):1403-1407
pubmed: 32669681
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2946-e2951
pubmed: 32840608
Sci Data. 2020 Oct 8;7(1):345
pubmed: 33033256