Hand-Arm Vibration Exposure in Rock Drill Workers: A Comparison between Measurements with Hand-Attached and Tool-Attached Accelerometers.
HAVS
accelerometer
exposure measurement
hand-arm vibration
hand-guided tools
hand-transmitted vibration
handheld
rock drills
Journal
Annals of work exposures and health
ISSN: 2398-7316
Titre abrégé: Ann Work Expo Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101698454
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 11 2021
09 11 2021
Historique:
received:
11
11
2020
revised:
07
06
2021
accepted:
18
06
2021
pubmed:
14
7
2021
medline:
25
11
2021
entrez:
13
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the hazard of tool vibrations, we need valid exposure measurements. The use of hand-attached accelerometers (vibration sensors) to measure hand-arm vibrations (HAVs) has become a popular approach. However, according to International Standard ISO 5349-2, the preferred attachment of accelerometers is at the tool handle. We compared measures of HAV between hand- and tool-attached accelerometers in rock drilling. We measured HAV in five rock drillers using jackleg drills in normal working operations with simultaneous measures of both hand-attached and tool-attached accelerometers. Five to seven measurement cycles of 15 s were executed on each worker, resulting in a total of 29 measurement cycles. To identify possible differences in working technique, we recorded videos of tool handle handgrips during drilling. There was a significant difference (9.5 m s-2; P ≤ 0.05) in vibration magnitudes measured by the tool-attached accelerometers compared with the hand-attached accelerometers. The hand-attached accelerometer showed a lower vibration magnitude for all workers (range of difference: 2.3-14.6). The variation between the two accelerometer attachments was larger between workers than within workers (ICC = 0.68). For measurements of HAV from jackleg drills, the use of hand-attached accelerometers may cause a lower recorded vibration level compared with tool-attached accelerometers. This difference is likely to vary depending on how workers grip the tool handle, and a misclassification of exposure will occur if workers grip the tool handle in a way that makes the accelerometer lose contact with the vibrating surface. Individual differences in how workers grip the tool handles should be considered when assessing HAV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34254993
pii: 6320085
doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxab051
pmc: PMC8577229
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1123-1132Subventions
Organisme : Norwegian RVO fond
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.
Références
J Fam Pract. 1994 Feb;38(2):180-5
pubmed: 8185734
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1986 Aug;12(4 Spec No):284-8
pubmed: 3775313
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1998 Jun;71(4):270-6
pubmed: 9638484
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jan;60(1):16-26
pubmed: 12499452
Occup Environ Med. 1997 Feb;54(2):73-89
pubmed: 9072014
Occup Environ Med. 1994 Jun;51(6):361-5
pubmed: 8044226
Appl Ergon. 2005 Jan;36(1):55-60
pubmed: 15627422
Occup Med (Lond). 2003 Aug;53(5):337-41
pubmed: 12890834
Ann Occup Hyg. 2007 Apr;51(3):305-10
pubmed: 17229762
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004 May;77(4):255-63
pubmed: 15034718
Occup Environ Med. 2020 Mar;77(3):188-193
pubmed: 31919277
Occup Environ Med. 2000 Apr;57(4):237-41
pubmed: 10810109
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Jan;90(1):93-106
pubmed: 27796506
Measurement ( Mahwah N J). 2014 Jan;47:64-77
pubmed: 26744580