A systematic review on outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials assessing treatment interventions in pregnant women with pregestational diabetes.


Journal

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
ISSN: 1471-0528
Titre abrégé: BJOG
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100935741

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
accepted: 25 05 2021
pubmed: 15 7 2021
medline: 18 11 2021
entrez: 14 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Studies assessing interventions to improve maternal and infant outcomes have increased exponentially over recent years. Several outcomes in this field of maternal diabetes are rare, making it difficult to synthesise evidence. To collect outcomes reported in studies assessing treatment interventions in pregnant women with PGDM. CENTRAL, Web of Science, Medline, CINAHL, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception until 27 January 2020. Any randomised controlled trial assessing treatment interventions in pregnant women with PGDM reported in English. Two independent reviewers assessed the suitability of articles and retrieved the data. Outcomes extracted from the literature were broadly categorised into maternal, fetal/infant or other outcomes by the study advisory group. Sixty-seven of the 1475 studies identified fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median number of outcomes reported per study was 15 (range 1-46). The majority of studies were from North America and Europe. Insulin and metformin were the most commonly investigated pharmacological interventions. Glucose monitoring was the most assessed technological intervention. In all, 131 unique outcomes were extracted: maternal (n = 69), fetal/infant (n = 61) and other (n = 1). Outcome reporting in treatment interventions trials of pregnant women with PGDM is varied, making it difficult to synthesise evidence, especially for rare outcomes. Systems are needed to standardise outcome reporting in future clinical trials and so facilitate evidence synthesis in this area of maternal diabetes. The systematic review was registered prospectively with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (Registration number CRD42020173549). Outcome reporting is heterogeneous in intervention trials of pregnant women with diabetes existing before pregnancy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Studies assessing interventions to improve maternal and infant outcomes have increased exponentially over recent years. Several outcomes in this field of maternal diabetes are rare, making it difficult to synthesise evidence.
OBJECTIVES
To collect outcomes reported in studies assessing treatment interventions in pregnant women with PGDM.
SEARCH STRATEGY
CENTRAL, Web of Science, Medline, CINAHL, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception until 27 January 2020.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Any randomised controlled trial assessing treatment interventions in pregnant women with PGDM reported in English.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two independent reviewers assessed the suitability of articles and retrieved the data. Outcomes extracted from the literature were broadly categorised into maternal, fetal/infant or other outcomes by the study advisory group.
MAIN RESULTS
Sixty-seven of the 1475 studies identified fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median number of outcomes reported per study was 15 (range 1-46). The majority of studies were from North America and Europe. Insulin and metformin were the most commonly investigated pharmacological interventions. Glucose monitoring was the most assessed technological intervention. In all, 131 unique outcomes were extracted: maternal (n = 69), fetal/infant (n = 61) and other (n = 1).
CONCLUSIONS
Outcome reporting in treatment interventions trials of pregnant women with PGDM is varied, making it difficult to synthesise evidence, especially for rare outcomes. Systems are needed to standardise outcome reporting in future clinical trials and so facilitate evidence synthesis in this area of maternal diabetes.
REGISTRATION
The systematic review was registered prospectively with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (Registration number CRD42020173549).
TWEETABLE ABSTRACT
Outcome reporting is heterogeneous in intervention trials of pregnant women with diabetes existing before pregnancy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34258852
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16842
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hypoglycemic Agents 0
Metformin 9100L32L2N

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1894-1904

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Jolving LR, Nielsen J, Kesmodel US, Nielsen RG, Beck-Nielsen SS, Norgard BM. Prevalence of maternal chronic diseases during pregnancy - a nationwide population based study from 1989 to 2013. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016;95:1295-304.
Diabetes care and research in Europe: the Saint Vincent declaration. Diabet Med 1990;7:360.
Capobianco G, Gulotta A, Tupponi G, Dessole F, Pola M, Virdis G, et al. Materno-fetal and neonatal complications of diabetes in pregnancy: a retrospective study. J Clin Med 2020;9:2707.
Linden K, Berg M, Adolfsson A, Sparud-Lundin C. Person-centred, web-based support in pregnancy and early motherhood for women with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med 2018;35:232-41.
Mostello D. Adherence to a diabetes care regimen following text message intervention in pregnant women with diabetes. 2016 [https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03025984]. Accessed 20 January 2020.
Ainuddin JA, Karim N, Zaheer S, Ali SS, Hasan AA. Metformin treatment in type 2 diabetes in pregnancy: an active controlled, parallel-group, randomized, open label study in patients with type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. J Diabetes Res 2015;2015:325851.
Carr KJ, Idama TO, Masson EA, Ellis K, Lindow SW. A randomised controlled trial of insulin lispro given before or after meals in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes-the effect on glycaemic excursion. J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;24:382-6.
Bartholomew ML, Soules K, Church K, Shaha S, Burlingame J, Graham G, et al. Managing diabetes in pregnancy using cell phone/internet technology. Clin Diabetes 2015;33:169-74.
Murphy HR, Kumareswaran K, Elleri D, Allen JM, Caldwell K, Biagioni M, et al. Safety and efficacy of 24-h closed-loop insulin delivery in well-controlled pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: a randomized crossover case series. Diabetes Care 2011;34:2527-9.
Egan AM, Danyliv A, Carmody L, Kirwan B, Dunne FP. A Prepregnancy care program for women with diabetes: effective and cost saving. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;101:1807-15.
Feig DS, Donovan LE, Corcoy R, Murphy KE, Amiel SA, Hunt KF, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017;390:2347-59.
Feig DS, Donovan LE, Zinman B, Sanchez JJ, Asztalos E, Ryan EA, et al. Metformin in women with type 2 diabetes in pregnancy (MiTy): a multicentre, international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020;8:834-44.
Meher S, Alfirevic Z. Choice of primary outcomes in randomised trials and systematic reviews evaluating interventions for preterm birth prevention: a systematic review. BJOG 2014;121:1188-94; discussion 95-6.
International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group Working Group on Outcome, Feig DS, Corcoy R, Jensen DM, Kautzky-Willer A, Nolan CJ, et al. Diabetes in pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and proposed codification of definitions. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2015;31:680-90.
Khan K. The CROWN Initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women's health. J Perinat Med 2014;42:543-4.
Kgosidialwa O, Bogdanet D, Egan A, O'Shea PM, Biesty L, Devane D, et al. Developing a core outcome set for the treatment of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes-a study protocol. Trials 2020;21:1017.
Bartal M. Detemir versus NPH for type 2 diabetes mellitus in pregnancy: a comparative-effectiveness, open label, randomized controlled trial. 2018 [https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03620890]. Accessed 20 January 2020.
Beazley D, Ahokas R, Livingston J, Griggs M, Sibai BM. Vitamin C and E supplementation in women at high risk for preeclampsia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:520-1.
Berry DC, Thomas SD, Dorman KF, Ivins AR, de los Angeles Abreu M, Young L, et al. Rationale, design, and methods for the Medical Optimization and Management of Pregnancies with Overt Type 2 Diabetes (MOMPOD) study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:488.
Beyuo T, Obed SA, Adjepong-Yamoah KK, Bugyei KA, Oppong SA, Marfoh K. Metformin versus insulin in the management of pre-gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital: a randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 2015;10:e0125712.
Brooten D, Youngblut JM, Brown L, Finkler SA, Neff DF, Madigan E. A randomized trial of nurse specialist home care for women with high-risk pregnancies: outcomes and costs. Am J Manag Care 2001;7:793-803.
Burkart W, Hanker JP, Schneider HP. Complications and fetal outcome in diabetic pregnancy. Intensified conventional versus insulin pump therapy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1988;26:104-12.
Caritis S, Sibai B, Hauth J, Lindheimer MD, Klebanoff M, Thom E, et al. Low-dose aspirin to prevent preeclampsia in women at high risk. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. N Engl J Med 1998;338:701-5.
Cordua S, Secher AL, Ringholm L, Damm P, Mathiesen ER. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring during labour and delivery in women with Type 1 diabetes - observations from a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med 2013;30:1374-81.
Demarini S, Mimouni F, Tsang RC, Khoury J, Hertzberg V. Impact of metabolic control of diabetes during pregnancy on neonatal hypocalcemia: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:918-22.
di Biase N, Napoli A, Sabbatini A, Borrello E, Buongiorno AM, Fallucca F. Telemedicine in the treatment of diabetic pregnancy. Ann Ist Super Sanita 1997;33:347-51.
Dieb AS. Effect of adding metformin to insulin therapy on pregnancy outcomes in women with uncontrolled type I diabetes. 2019 [https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03928340]. Accessed 20 January 2020.
Feghali MN. Metformin for preeclampsia prevention in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus. 2019 [https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03570632]. Accessed 20 January 2020.
Feig DS, Murphy K, Asztalos E, Tomlinson G, Sanchez J, Zinman B, et al. Metformin in women with type 2 diabetes in pregnancy (MiTy): a multi-center randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016;16:173.
Finnegan C, Breathnach F, Dicker P, Fernandez E, Tully E, Higgins M, et al. Investigating the role of early low-dose aspirin in diabetes: a phase III multicentre double-blinded placebo-controlled randomised trial of aspirin therapy initiated in the first trimester of diabetes pregnancy. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2019;16:100465.
Forster DA, Moorhead AM, Jacobs SE, Davis PG, Walker SP, McEgan KM, et al. Advising women with diabetes in pregnancy to express breastmilk in late pregnancy (Diabetes and Antenatal Milk Expressing [DAME]): a multicentre, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017;389:2204-13.
Garmy G. Effect of intrapartum glucose with compared to without constant intravenous insulin on neonatal hypoglycemia among diabetic women. A randomized controlled trial. 2017 [https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03273881]. Accessed 20 January 2020.
Gray L. Utilizing mHealth to improve diabetes in an obstetric population. 2018 [https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03504592]. Accessed 20 January 2020.
Hanson U, Persson B, Enochsson E, Lennerhagen P, Lindgren F, Lundstrom V, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose by diabetic women during the third trimester of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;150:817-21.
Hayden T, Perantie DC, Nix BD, Barnes LD, Mostello DJ, Holcomb WL, et al. Treating prepartum depression to improve infant developmental outcomes: a study of diabetes in pregnancy. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2012;19:285-92.
Herrera KM, Rosenn BM, Foroutan J, Bimson BE, Al Ibraheemi Z, Moshier EL, et al. Randomized controlled trial of insulin detemir versus NPH for the treatment of pregnant women with diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:426.e1-7.
Hickman MA, McBride R, Boggess KA, Strauss R. Metformin compared with insulin in the treatment of pregnant women with overt diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol 2013;30:483-90.
Hod M, Damm P, Kaaja R, Visser GH, Dunne F, Demidova I, et al. Fetal and perinatal outcomes in type 1 diabetes pregnancy: a randomized study comparing insulin aspart with human insulin in 322 subjects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:186.e1-7.
Hod M, Mathiesen ER, Jovanovic L, McCance DR, Ivanisevic M, Duran-Garcia S, et al. A randomized trial comparing perinatal outcomes using insulin detemir or neutral protamine Hagedorn in type 1 diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:7-13.
Horvaticek M, Djelmis J, Ivanisevic M, Oreskovic S, Herman M. Effect of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on C-peptide preservation in pregnant women with type-1 diabetes: randomized placebo controlled clinical trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 2017;71:968-72.
Ibrahim MI, Hamdy A, Shafik A, Taha S, Anwar M, Faris M. The role of adding metformin in insulin-resistant diabetic pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;289:959-65.
Incerpi MH, Fassett MJ, Kjos SL, Tran SH, Wing DA. Vaginally administered misoprostol for outpatient cervical ripening in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:916-9.
Jovanovic-Peterson L, Kitzmiller JL, Peterson CM. Randomized trial of human versus animal species insulin in diabetic pregnant women: improved glycemic control, not fewer antibodies to insulin, influences birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1325-30.
Kjos SL, Henry OA, Montoro M, Buchanan TA, Mestman JH. Insulin-requiring diabetes in pregnancy: a randomized trial of active induction of labor and expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:611-5.
Laatikainen L, Teramo K, Hieta-Heikurainen H, Koivisto V, Pelkonen R. A controlled study of the influence of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion treatment on diabetic retinopathy during pregnancy. Acta Med Scand 1987;221:367-76.
Lin L, Zhu Y, Li B, Yang H, APPEC Study Group. Low-dose aspirin in the prevention of pre-eclampsia in China (APPEC study): protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018;19:608.
Manderson JG, Patterson CC, Hadden DR, Traub AI, Ennis C, McCance DR. Preprandial versus postprandial blood glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetic pregnancy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:507-12.
Mathiesen ER, Hod M, Ivanisevic M, Duran Garcia S, Brondsted L, Jovanovic L, et al. Maternal efficacy and safety outcomes in a randomized, controlled trial comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin in 310 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2012;35:2012-7.
Mathiesen ER, Kinsley B, Amiel SA, Heller S, McCance D, Duran S, et al. Maternal glycemic control and hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetic pregnancy: a randomized trial of insulin aspart versus human insulin in 322 pregnant women. Diabetes Care 2007;30:771-6.
McCance DR, Holmes VA, Maresh MJ, Patterson CC, Walker JD, Pearson DW, et al. Vitamins C and E for prevention of pre-eclampsia in women with type 1 diabetes (DAPIT): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2010;376:259-66.
Mimouni F, Miodovnik M, Whitsett JA, Holroyde JC, Siddiqi TA, Tsang RC. Respiratory distress syndrome in infants of diabetic mothers in the 1980s: no direct adverse effect of maternal diabetes with modern management. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:191-5.
Min Y, Djahanbakhch O, Hutchinson J, Bhullar AS, Raveendran M, Hallot A, et al. Effect of docosahexaenoic acid-enriched fish oil supplementation in pregnant women with Type 2 diabetes on membrane fatty acids and fetal body composition-double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial. Diabet Med 2014;31:1331-40.
Monincx WM, Zondervan HA, Birnie E, Ris M, Bossuyt PM. High risk pregnancy monitored antenatally at home. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;75:147-53.
Murphy HR, Rayman G, Lewis K, Kelly S, Johal B, Duffield K, et al. Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with diabetes: randomised clinical trial. BMJ 2008;337:a1680.
Nachum Z, Ben-Shlomo I, Weiner E, Shalev E. Twice daily versus four times daily insulin dose regimens for diabetes in pregnancy: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1999;319:1223-7.
Ney D, Hollingsworth DR, Cousins L. Decreased insulin requirement and improved control of diabetes in pregnant women given a high-carbohydrate, high-fiber, low-fat diet. Diabetes Care 1982;5:529-33.
Nor Azlin MI, Nor NA, Sufian SS, Mustafa N, Jamil MA, Kamaruddin NA. Comparative study of two insulin regimes in pregnancy complicated by diabetes mellitus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:407-8.
Notelovitz M. Sulphonylurea therapy in the treatment of the pregnant diabetic. S Afr Med J 1971;45:226-9.
Perichart-Perera O, Balas-Nakash M, Rodriguez-Cano A, Legorreta-Legorreta J, Parra-Covarrubias A, Vadillo-Ortega F. Low glycemic index carbohydrates versus all types of carbohydrates for treating diabetes in pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of glycemic control. Int J Endocrinol 2012;2012:296017.
Persson B, Swahn ML, Hjertberg R, Hanson U, Nord E, Nordlander E, et al. Insulin lispro therapy in pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2002;58:115-21.
Petrovski G, Dimitrovski C, Bogoev M, Milenkovic T, Ahmeti I, Bitovska I. Is there a difference in pregnancy and glycemic outcome in patients with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump with constant or intermittent glucose monitoring? A pilot study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13:1109-13.
Polsky S. Pregnancy intervention with a closed-loop system (PICLS) study. 2019 [https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03774186]. Accessed 20 January 2020.
Refuerzo JS, Gowen R, Pedroza C, Hutchinson M, Blackwell SC, Ramin S. A pilot randomized, controlled trial of metformin versus insulin in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus during pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 2015;30:163-70.
Ringholm L. Insulin fiasp vs. insulin novorapid during pregnancy and laction in women with pre-existing diabetes. 2019 [https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03770767]. Accessed 21 January 2020.
Rosenberg VA, Eglinton GS, Rauch ER, Skupski DW. Intrapartum maternal glycemic control in women with insulin requiring diabetes: a randomized clinical trial of rotating fluids versus insulin drip. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1095-9.
Sacks DA, Feig DS, Liu IL, Wolde-Tsadik G. Managing type I diabetes in pregnancy: how near normal is necessary? J Perinatol 2006;26:458-62.
Secher AL, Ringholm L, Andersen HU, Damm P, Mathiesen ER. The effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1877-83.
Stewart ZA, Wilinska ME, Hartnell S, O'Neil LK, Rayman G, Scott EM, et al. Day-and-night closed-loop insulin delivery in a broad population of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Diabetes Care 2018;41:1391-9.
Stewart ZA, Wilinska ME, Hartnell S, Temple RC, Rayman G, Stanley KP, et al. Closed-loop insulin delivery during pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016;375:644-54.
Varner MW. Efficacy of home glucose monitoring in diabetic pregnancy. Am J Med 1983;75:592-6.
Voormolen DN, DeVries JH, Sanson RME, Heringa MP, de Valk HW, Kok M, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring during diabetic pregnancy (GlucoMOMS): a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:1894-902.
Wen SW, White RR, Rybak N, Gaudet LM, Robson S, Hague W, et al. Effect of high dose folic acid supplementation in pregnancy on pre-eclampsia (FACT): double blind, phase III, randomised controlled, international, multicentre trial. BMJ 2018;362:k3478.
Wojcicki JM, Ladyzynski P, Krzymien J, Jozwicka E, Blachowicz J, Janczewska E, et al. What we can really expect from telemedicine in intensive diabetes treatment: results from 3-year study on type 1 pregnant diabetic women. Diabetes Technol Ther 2001;3:581-9.
Wright TE, Martin D, Qualls C, Curet LB. Effects of intrapartum administration of invert sugar and D5LR on neonatal blood glucose levels. J Perinatol 2000;20:217-8.
York R, Brown LP, Samuels P, Finkler SA, Jacobsen B, Persely CA, et al. A randomized trial of early discharge and nurse specialist transitional follow-up care of high-risk childbearing women. Nurs Res 1997;46:254-61.
NovoNordisk. A trial comparing the effect and safety of insulin degludec versus insulin detemir, both in combination with insulin aspart, in the treatment of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. 2017 [https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03377699]. Accessed 21 January 2020.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71.
Duffy JMN, Ziebland S, von Dadelszen P, McManus RJ. Tackling poorly selected, collected, and reported outcomes in obstetrics and gynecology research. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;220:71.e1-4.
Dodd S, Clarke M, Becker L, Mavergames C, Fish R, Williamson PR. A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery. J Clin Epidemiol 2018;96:84-92.
Young AE, Brookes ST, Avery KNL, Davies A, Metcalfe C, Blazeby JM. A systematic review of core outcome set development studies demonstrates difficulties in defining unique outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2019;115:14-24.
Wahabi HA, Fayed A, Esmaeil S, Elmorshedy H, Titi MA, Amer YS, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of pre-pregnancy care for women with diabetes for improving maternal and perinatal outcomes. PLoS One 2020;15:e0237571.
Egan AM, Galjaard S, Maresh MJA, Loeken MR, Napoli A, Anastasiou E, et al. A core outcome set for studies evaluating the effectiveness of prepregnancy care for women with pregestational diabetes. Diabetologia 2017;60:1190-6.

Auteurs

O Kgosidialwa (O)

School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

D Bogdanet (D)

School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

A Egan (A)

Department of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

C Newman (C)

School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

P M O'Shea (PM)

School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

L Biesty (L)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Ireland HRB-Trials Methodology Research Network, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

C McDonagh (C)

School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

C O'Shea (C)

School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

D Devane (D)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Ireland HRB-Trials Methodology Research Network, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

F Dunne (F)

School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH