Assessment of the upper limb of the tetraplegic patient.


Journal

Hand surgery & rehabilitation
ISSN: 2468-1210
Titre abrégé: Hand Surg Rehabil
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101681801

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2022
Historique:
received: 01 05 2018
revised: 15 09 2018
accepted: 01 02 2019
pubmed: 16 7 2021
medline: 5 4 2022
entrez: 15 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of our study is to describe the assessment of the upper limb in tetraplegic patients to follow his (her) neurological progression and to define the medical or surgical treatment program. We selected upper limb assessment tools and scales for tetraplegic patients described in the medical literature through a PubMed search over the last four decades. For each method, we present the implementation rules and its metrological properties, including its validity in French. We selected five clinical scales for functional evaluation of grasping, as well as four scales for evaluating the overall function of these patients. Finally, we identified three complementary precision assessment tools. The AIS (ASIA Impairment Scale) classification describes the level and the severity of the spinal cord lesion. The Giens classification is more practical for describing the upper limb in middle and low tetraplegia. Impairments can be assessed with most common generic scales and nonspecific measurement devices: range of motion, strength, sensory loss, spasticity, joint pain. Measurement of pinch and grip strength is widely used and easy to perform. The Capabilities of Upper Extremity (CUE) and the Jebsen Taylor Test are the best validated and usable scales. At a general functional level, the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) is the most relevant scale in these patients. Motor nerve blocks, electromyography, movement analysis and echography are promising additional methods. Assessment of the upper limb of tetraplegic patients relies both on generic and specific assessment tools and scales.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34265478
pii: S2468-1229(21)00181-X
doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2019.02.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

S137-S147

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 SFCM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

V Moiziard (V)

Université de Montpellier, Département de MPR CHU de Montpellier, Euromov Digital Health in Motion, Montpellier, France.

T Lansaman (T)

Service de MPR, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, 104 Boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380 Garches, France.

E Mauruc Soubirac (E)

Service de MPR, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, 104 Boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380 Garches, France.

M Revol (M)

Service de Chirurgie Plastique, Hôpital Saint Louis, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.

B Coulet (B)

Université de Montpellier, Département de Chirurgie orthopédique, CHU de Montpellier, Euromov Digital Health in Motion, Montpellier, France.

C Hugeron (C)

Service de MPR, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, 104 Boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380 Garches, France.

A Gelis (A)

Université de Montpellier, Centre Propara, Montpellier, France.

I Laffont (I)

Université de Montpellier, Département de MPR CHU de Montpellier, Euromov Digital Health in Motion, Montpellier, France. Electronic address: i-laffont@chu-montpellier.fr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH