Impact of an integrated community-based model of care for older people with complex conditions on hospital emergency presentations and admissions: a step-wedged cluster randomized trial.
Complexity
Emergency department
Hospital admissions
Integration
Older person
Primary care
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jul 2021
16 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
22
02
2021
accepted:
18
06
2021
entrez:
17
7
2021
pubmed:
18
7
2021
medline:
21
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Health systems must reorient towards preventative and co-ordinated care to reduce hospital demand and achieve positive and fiscally responsible outcomes for older persons with complex needs. Integrated care models can improve outcomes by aligning primary practice with the specialist health and social services required to manage complex needs. This paper describes the impact of a community-facing program that integrates care at the primary-secondary interface on the rate of Emergency Department (ED) presentation and hospital admissions among older people with complex needs. The Older Persons Enablement and Rehabilitation for Complex Health Conditions (OPEN ARCH) study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with a stepped wedge cluster design. General practitioners (GPs; n = 14) in primary practice within the Cairns region are considered 'clusters' each comprising a mixed number of participants. 80 community-dwelling persons over 70 years of age if non-Indigenous and over 50 years of age if Indigenous were included at baseline with no new participants added during the study. Clusters were randomly assigned to one of three steps that represent the time at which they would commence the OPEN ARCH intervention, and the subsequent intervention duration (3, 6, or 9 months). Each participant was its own control. GPs and participants were not blinded. The primary outcomes were ED presentations and hospital admissions. Data were collected from Queensland Health Casemix data and analysed with multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression modelling to estimate the effectiveness of the OPEN ARCH intervention. Data were analysed at the cluster and participant levels. Five clusters were randomised to steps 1 and 2, and 4 clusters randomised to step 3. All clusters (n = 14) completed the trial accounting for 80 participants. An effect size of 9% in service use (95% CI) was expected. The OPEN ARCH intervention was found to not make a statistically significant difference to ED presentations or admissions. However, a stabilising of ED presentations and a trend toward lower hospitalisation rates over time was observed. While this study detected no statistically significant change in ED presentations or hospital admissions, a plateauing of ED presentation and admission rates is a clinically significant finding for older persons with complex needs. Multi-sectoral integrated programs of care require an adequate preparation period and sufficient duration of intervention for effectiveness to be measured. The OPEN ARCH study received ethical approval from the Far North Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee, HREC/17/QCH/104-1174 and is registered on the Australian and New Zealand Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000198325p .
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Health systems must reorient towards preventative and co-ordinated care to reduce hospital demand and achieve positive and fiscally responsible outcomes for older persons with complex needs. Integrated care models can improve outcomes by aligning primary practice with the specialist health and social services required to manage complex needs. This paper describes the impact of a community-facing program that integrates care at the primary-secondary interface on the rate of Emergency Department (ED) presentation and hospital admissions among older people with complex needs.
METHODS
METHODS
The Older Persons Enablement and Rehabilitation for Complex Health Conditions (OPEN ARCH) study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with a stepped wedge cluster design. General practitioners (GPs; n = 14) in primary practice within the Cairns region are considered 'clusters' each comprising a mixed number of participants. 80 community-dwelling persons over 70 years of age if non-Indigenous and over 50 years of age if Indigenous were included at baseline with no new participants added during the study. Clusters were randomly assigned to one of three steps that represent the time at which they would commence the OPEN ARCH intervention, and the subsequent intervention duration (3, 6, or 9 months). Each participant was its own control. GPs and participants were not blinded. The primary outcomes were ED presentations and hospital admissions. Data were collected from Queensland Health Casemix data and analysed with multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression modelling to estimate the effectiveness of the OPEN ARCH intervention. Data were analysed at the cluster and participant levels.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Five clusters were randomised to steps 1 and 2, and 4 clusters randomised to step 3. All clusters (n = 14) completed the trial accounting for 80 participants. An effect size of 9% in service use (95% CI) was expected. The OPEN ARCH intervention was found to not make a statistically significant difference to ED presentations or admissions. However, a stabilising of ED presentations and a trend toward lower hospitalisation rates over time was observed.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
While this study detected no statistically significant change in ED presentations or hospital admissions, a plateauing of ED presentation and admission rates is a clinically significant finding for older persons with complex needs. Multi-sectoral integrated programs of care require an adequate preparation period and sufficient duration of intervention for effectiveness to be measured.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
The OPEN ARCH study received ethical approval from the Far North Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee, HREC/17/QCH/104-1174 and is registered on the Australian and New Zealand Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000198325p .
Identifiants
pubmed: 34271945
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06668-x
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06668-x
pmc: PMC8285878
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
701Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Aust J Prim Health. 2021 Jun;27(3):236-242
pubmed: 33653509
Trials. 2018 Dec 4;19(1):668
pubmed: 30514378
Aust J Prim Health. 2020 Apr;26(2):104-108
pubmed: 32290951
Int J Integr Care. 2015 Sep 23;15:e014
pubmed: 26417209
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Nov 08;6:54
pubmed: 17092344
Med J Aust. 2019 Jul;211(2):60-62.e1
pubmed: 31206179
Health Syst Reform. 2017 Jul 3;3(3):236-247
pubmed: 31514669
Aust J Prim Health. 2015;21(4):391-408
pubmed: 26329878
Int J Integr Care. 2015 Sep 23;15:e021
pubmed: 26528096
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Mar 14;16:35
pubmed: 25886960
Aust J Prim Health. 2021 Jun;27(3):194-201
pubmed: 33535025
Aust Health Rev. 2007 Aug;31(3):451-61; discussion 449-50
pubmed: 17669069
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Jun 26;20(2):16
pubmed: 32607103
Med J Aust. 2002 Nov 4;177(9):469-70
pubmed: 12405885
Lancet. 2008 Mar 1;371(9614):725-35
pubmed: 18313501
Int J Integr Care. 2013 Mar 22;13:e010
pubmed: 23687482
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Sep;28(9):697-705
pubmed: 30397078