A novel data mining application to detect safety signals for newly approved medications in routine care of patients with diabetes.
data mining
diabetes
medication
Journal
Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism
ISSN: 2398-9238
Titre abrégé: Endocrinol Diabetes Metab
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101732442
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
20
10
2020
revised:
17
01
2021
accepted:
23
01
2021
entrez:
19
7
2021
pubmed:
20
7
2021
medline:
15
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Clinical trials are often underpowered to detect serious but rare adverse events of a new medication. We applied a novel data mining tool to detect potential adverse events of canagliflozin, the first sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2 inhibitor) in the United States, using real-world data from shortly after its market entry and before public awareness of its potential safety concerns. In a U. S. commercial claims dataset (29 March 2013-30 Sept 2015), two pairwise cohorts of patients over 18 years of age with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who were newly dispensed canagliflozin or an active comparator, that is a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4) or a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP1), were identified and propensity score-matched. We used variable ratio matching with up to four people receiving a DPP4 or GLP1 for each person receiving canagliflozin. We identified potential safety signals using a hierarchical tree-based scan statistic data mining method with the hierarchical outcome tree constructed based on international classification of disease coding. We screened for incident adverse events where there were more outcomes observed among canagliflozin vs. comparator initiators than expected by chance, after adjusting for multiple testing. We identified two pairwise propensity score variable ratio matched cohorts of 44,733 canagliflozin vs. 99,458 DPP4 initiators, and 55,974 canagliflozin vs. 74,727 GLP1 initiators. When we screened inpatient and emergency room diagnoses, diabetic ketoacidosis was the only severe adverse event associated with canagliflozin initiation with In a large population-based study, we identified known but no other adverse events associated with canagliflozin, providing reassurance on its safety among adult patients with T2D and suggesting the tree-based scan statistic method is a useful post-marketing safety monitoring tool for newly approved medications.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Clinical trials are often underpowered to detect serious but rare adverse events of a new medication. We applied a novel data mining tool to detect potential adverse events of canagliflozin, the first sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2 inhibitor) in the United States, using real-world data from shortly after its market entry and before public awareness of its potential safety concerns.
METHODS
METHODS
In a U. S. commercial claims dataset (29 March 2013-30 Sept 2015), two pairwise cohorts of patients over 18 years of age with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who were newly dispensed canagliflozin or an active comparator, that is a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4) or a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP1), were identified and propensity score-matched. We used variable ratio matching with up to four people receiving a DPP4 or GLP1 for each person receiving canagliflozin. We identified potential safety signals using a hierarchical tree-based scan statistic data mining method with the hierarchical outcome tree constructed based on international classification of disease coding. We screened for incident adverse events where there were more outcomes observed among canagliflozin vs. comparator initiators than expected by chance, after adjusting for multiple testing.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We identified two pairwise propensity score variable ratio matched cohorts of 44,733 canagliflozin vs. 99,458 DPP4 initiators, and 55,974 canagliflozin vs. 74,727 GLP1 initiators. When we screened inpatient and emergency room diagnoses, diabetic ketoacidosis was the only severe adverse event associated with canagliflozin initiation with
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
CONCLUSIONS
In a large population-based study, we identified known but no other adverse events associated with canagliflozin, providing reassurance on its safety among adult patients with T2D and suggesting the tree-based scan statistic method is a useful post-marketing safety monitoring tool for newly approved medications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34277962
doi: 10.1002/edm2.237
pii: EDM2237
pmc: PMC8279599
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
0
Canagliflozin
0SAC974Z85
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e00237Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K08 AG055670
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr. Patorno is co‐investigator of an investigator‐initiated grant to the Brigham and Women's Hospital from Boehringer‐Ingelheim, not directly related to the topic of the submitted work. Dr. Donald Redelmeier has received funding from a Canada Research Chair in Medical Decision Sciences, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the BrightFocus Foundation. Dr. Schneeweiss is consultant to WHISCON, LLC and to Aetion, Inc., a software manufacturer of which he also owns equity. He is principal investigator of investigator‐initiated grants to the Brigham and Women's Hospital from Genentech, Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim not directly related to the topic of this manuscript. Dr. Kulldorff was supported by National Institute of General Medical Sciences Grant RO1GM108999. Ms. Vine worked for a consulting company where some of her clients were pharmaceutical companies and her projects involved diabetes drugs, but is no longer employed there and none of her projects there relate to this paper. Dr. Wang received salary support from investigator‐initiated grants to the Brigham and Women's Hospital from Boehringer‐Ingelheim, Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Johnson & Johnson, unrelated to this work.
Références
JAMA. 2017 May 9;317(18):1854-1863
pubmed: 28492899
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2300-2302
pubmed: 28591538
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jun 1;187(6):1269-1276
pubmed: 29860470
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Aug;82(2):143-56
pubmed: 17554243
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2295-2306
pubmed: 30990260
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Feb 5;170(3):155-163
pubmed: 30597484
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Aug;19(8):858-68
pubmed: 20681003
Pharmaceutics. 2013 Mar 14;5(1):179-200
pubmed: 24300404
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):391-397
pubmed: 29446176
Epidemiology. 2018 Nov;29(6):895-903
pubmed: 30074538
Value Health. 2015 Dec;18(8):1063-9
pubmed: 26686792
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S73-S85
pubmed: 29222379
BMJ. 2014 Oct 30;349:g6196
pubmed: 25359996
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Mar;99(3):325-32
pubmed: 26690726
BMJ. 2017 Sep 7;358:j3837
pubmed: 28882831
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 May;22(5):517-23
pubmed: 23512870
JAMA. 2017 Dec 5;318(21):2137-2138
pubmed: 29209711
Drug Saf. 2019 Jan;42(1):85-93
pubmed: 30066315
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Feb;21(2):434-438
pubmed: 30207042
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107
pubmed: 19757444
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):55-63
pubmed: 29159410
JAMA. 2014 Jan 22-29;311(4):368-77
pubmed: 24449315
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):644-657
pubmed: 28605608
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 5;370(23):2161-3
pubmed: 24897079
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Jun 12;5(1):6
pubmed: 29881732
BMJ. 2020 Aug 25;370:m2812
pubmed: 32843476
JAMA. 2011 Jun 8;305(22):2320-6
pubmed: 21642684
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Jan 15;15:17
pubmed: 24428898
Biometrics. 2003 Jun;59(2):323-31
pubmed: 12926717
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 6;7(1):2824
pubmed: 28588220