Valve-sparing aortic root replacement in adult patients with congenital heart disease.
Aortic root dilatation
Congenital heart disease
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement
Journal
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
ISSN: 1569-9285
Titre abrégé: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101158399
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 11 2021
22 11 2021
Historique:
received:
31
03
2021
revised:
12
05
2021
accepted:
03
06
2021
pubmed:
20
7
2021
medline:
8
3
2022
entrez:
19
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Aortic root dilatation is frequently observed in patients with congenital heart defects (CHD), but has received little attention in terms of developing a best practice approach for treatment. In this study, we analysed our experience with aortic valve-sparing root replacement in patients following previous operations to repair CHD. In this study, we included 7 patients with a history of previous surgery for CHD who underwent aortic valve-sparing operations. The underlying initial defects were tetralogy of Fallot (n = 3), transposition of great arteries (n = 2), coarctation of the aorta (n = 1), and pulmonary atresia with ventricle septum defect (n = 1). The patients' age ranged from 20 to 40 years (mean age 31 ± 6 years). David reimplantation was performed in 6 patients and a Yacoub remodelling procedure was performed in 1 patient. Four patients underwent simultaneous pulmonary valve replacement. The mean interval between the corrective procedure for CHD and the aortic valve-sparing surgery was 26 ± 3 years. There was no operative or late mortality. The patient with transposition of great arteries following an arterial switch operation was re-operated 25 months after the valve-sparing procedure due to severe aortic regurgitation. In all other patients, the aortic valve regurgitation was mild or negligible at the latest follow-up (mean 8.7 years, range 2.1-15.1 years). Valve-sparing aortic root replacement resulted in good aortic valve function during the first decade of observation in 6 of 7 patients. This approach can offer a viable alternative to root replacement with mechanical or biological prostheses in selected patients following CHD repair.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34279037
pii: 6323699
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab189
pmc: PMC8632745
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
959-965Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.