A transient postnatal quiescent period precedes emergence of mature cortical dynamics.
cortical development
elarge scale electrophysiology
human
mouse
neuroscience
systems neuroscience
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 07 2021
23 07 2021
Historique:
received:
01
04
2021
accepted:
26
06
2021
pubmed:
24
7
2021
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
23
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mature neural networks synchronize and integrate spatiotemporal activity patterns to support cognition. Emergence of these activity patterns and functions is believed to be developmentally regulated, but the postnatal time course for neural networks to perform complex computations remains unknown. We investigate the progression of large-scale synaptic and cellular activity patterns across development using high spatiotemporal resolution in vivo electrophysiology in immature mice. We reveal that mature cortical processes emerge rapidly and simultaneously after a discrete but volatile transition period at the beginning of the second postnatal week of rodent development. The transition is characterized by relative neural quiescence, after which spatially distributed, temporally precise, and internally organized activity occurs. We demonstrate a similar developmental trajectory in humans, suggesting an evolutionarily conserved mechanism that could facilitate a transition in network operation. We hypothesize that this transient quiescent period is a requisite for the subsequent emergence of coordinated cortical networks. It can take several months, or even years, for the brain of a young animal to develop and refine the complex neural networks which underpin cognitive abilities such as memory, planning, and decision making. While the properties that support these functions have been well-documented, less is known about how they emerge during development. Domínguez, Ma, Yu et al. therefore set out to determine when exactly these properties began to take shape in mice, using lightweight nets of electrodes to record brain activity in sleeping newborn pups. The nets were designed to avoid disturbing the animals or damaging their fragile brains. The recordings showed that patterns of brain activity similar to those seen in adults emerged during the first couple of weeks after birth. Just before, however, the brains of the pups went through a brief period of reduced activity: this lull seemed to mark a transition from an immature to a more mature mode of operation. After this pause, neurons in the mouse brains showed coordinated patterns of firing reminiscent of those seen in adults. By monitoring the brains of human babies using scalp sensors, Domínguez, Ma, Yu et al. showed that a similar transition also occurs in infants during their first few months of life, suggesting that brains may mature via a process retained across species. Overall, the relative lull in activity before transition may mark when neural networks gain mature properties; in the future, it could therefore potentially be used to diagnose and monitor individuals with delayed cognitive development.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
It can take several months, or even years, for the brain of a young animal to develop and refine the complex neural networks which underpin cognitive abilities such as memory, planning, and decision making. While the properties that support these functions have been well-documented, less is known about how they emerge during development. Domínguez, Ma, Yu et al. therefore set out to determine when exactly these properties began to take shape in mice, using lightweight nets of electrodes to record brain activity in sleeping newborn pups. The nets were designed to avoid disturbing the animals or damaging their fragile brains. The recordings showed that patterns of brain activity similar to those seen in adults emerged during the first couple of weeks after birth. Just before, however, the brains of the pups went through a brief period of reduced activity: this lull seemed to mark a transition from an immature to a more mature mode of operation. After this pause, neurons in the mouse brains showed coordinated patterns of firing reminiscent of those seen in adults. By monitoring the brains of human babies using scalp sensors, Domínguez, Ma, Yu et al. showed that a similar transition also occurs in infants during their first few months of life, suggesting that brains may mature via a process retained across species. Overall, the relative lull in activity before transition may mark when neural networks gain mature properties; in the future, it could therefore potentially be used to diagnose and monitor individuals with delayed cognitive development.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34296997
doi: 10.7554/eLife.69011
pii: 69011
pmc: PMC8357419
doi:
pii:
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.15dv41nxp']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R21 EY032381
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021, Domínguez et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
SD, LM, HY, GP, CM, GS, CC, GB, GF, DK, JG No competing interests declared
Références
Neuron. 2021 Apr 21;109(8):1350-1364.e6
pubmed: 33675685
Neuron. 2010 Aug 12;67(3):480-98
pubmed: 20696384
Neuron. 2011 Oct 6;72(1):153-65
pubmed: 21982376
Science. 2007 Mar 30;315(5820):1860-2
pubmed: 17395832
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 Feb;60(2):95-105
pubmed: 2578372
Science. 2016 Oct 7;354(6308):
pubmed: 27846470
Prog Neurobiol. 2013 Apr;103:3-27
pubmed: 23195880
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):1195
pubmed: 30867422
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Mar;21(3):666-82
pubmed: 20705896
Brain. 2019 Nov 1;142(11):3502-3513
pubmed: 31501850
J Neurosci. 2016 Nov 30;36(48):12259-12275
pubmed: 27903733
J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 2;29(35):10890-9
pubmed: 19726647
Neuroscience. 2001;105(1):7-17
pubmed: 11483296
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Jun;23(6):1299-316
pubmed: 22593243
Nat Neurosci. 2009 Jul;12(7):919-26
pubmed: 19483687
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1980 Dec;50(5-6):457-66
pubmed: 6160988
Nat Commun. 2019 Jun 6;10(1):2478
pubmed: 31171779
Nature. 2004 Dec 9;432(7018):758-61
pubmed: 15592414
Neuron. 2014 Oct 22;84(2):470-85
pubmed: 25263753
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995 Aug;5(4):504-10
pubmed: 7488853
Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 2;8(1):758
pubmed: 28970502
Science. 2019 Jan 11;363(6423):168-173
pubmed: 30630930
Neuron. 2015 Jul 15;87(2):399-410
pubmed: 26182421
Brain Struct Funct. 2020 Apr;225(3):1169-1183
pubmed: 32095901
Cereb Cortex. 2011 May;21(5):1192-202
pubmed: 20966045
Curr Biol. 2020 Jun 22;30(12):2404-2410.e4
pubmed: 32413304
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Jul;19(7):959-64
pubmed: 27182818
Science. 1995 Jun 9;268(5216):1503-6
pubmed: 7770778
Front Cell Neurosci. 2017 Sep 20;11:289
pubmed: 28979189
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1976 Jul;41(1):64-72
pubmed: 58769
Neuron. 2004 Jun 10;42(5):789-801
pubmed: 15182718
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jul;17(7):1582-94
pubmed: 16950867
Neuroscience. 2013 Oct 10;250:240-52
pubmed: 23872391
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 27;107(17):7957-62
pubmed: 20375279
Dev Psychobiol. 2015 May;57(4):506-17
pubmed: 25864710
Neuron. 2012 Sep 6;75(5):875-88
pubmed: 22958827
Nature. 2006 Mar 30;440(7084):680-3
pubmed: 16474382
Elife. 2020 Nov 18;9:
pubmed: 33206597
Elife. 2021 Jul 23;10:
pubmed: 34296997
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Nov;21(11):1600-1608
pubmed: 30349107
Science. 2011 Oct 14;334(6053):226-9
pubmed: 21998388
Neuron. 2016 Feb 3;89(3):521-35
pubmed: 26844832
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Feb;21(2):137-149
pubmed: 28063662
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Nov 11;94(23):12699-704
pubmed: 9356513
Nature. 1995 Nov 2;378(6552):75-8
pubmed: 7477292
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Jul;10(3):323-52
pubmed: 8408599
J Neurosci. 2006 Jun 21;26(25):6728-36
pubmed: 16793880
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Feb;18(2):310-5
pubmed: 25531570
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7716):97-101
pubmed: 30046106
Cell Rep. 2015 Apr 21;11(3):486-97
pubmed: 25865885
Science. 2019 Jan 25;363(6425):413-417
pubmed: 30679375
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 1;106(35):15049-54
pubmed: 19706480
Sleep. 2008 May;31(5):691-9
pubmed: 18517038
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Apr;10(4):453-61
pubmed: 17351636
Neuroimage. 2017 Sep;158:70-78
pubmed: 28676297
Neuron. 2020 Jan 8;105(1):93-105.e4
pubmed: 31780328
Trends Neurosci. 2006 Jul;29(7):414-418
pubmed: 16713634
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Feb 13;11(2):e1004072
pubmed: 25679780
J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 28;29(43):13484-93
pubmed: 19864561
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 Apr;2(2):89-103
pubmed: 3916842
Science. 2001 Aug 10;293(5532):1159-63
pubmed: 11498596
Neuron. 2014 Jul 16;83(2):467-480
pubmed: 25033186
Science. 2017 Oct 20;358(6361):369-372
pubmed: 29051381
J Neurosci. 1993 Aug;13(8):3252-65
pubmed: 8340806
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jan;10(1):100-7
pubmed: 17173043
Sleep. 2017 Sep 1;40(9):
pubmed: 28934529
J Neurosci. 2014 Aug 13;34(33):10870-83
pubmed: 25122889
Dev Psychobiol. 1970;2(4):216-39
pubmed: 5527153
J Neurosci. 2012 Jan 11;32(2):692-702
pubmed: 22238105
Comp Med. 2019 Dec 1;69(6):468-489
pubmed: 31822323
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 8;106(49):20942-7
pubmed: 19934062
Neuron. 2017 Jul 19;95(2):424-435.e6
pubmed: 28689981
Neuron. 2006 Apr 6;50(1):145-57
pubmed: 16600862