Focused Ion Microbeam Irradiation Induces Clustering of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Heterochromatin Visualized by Nanoscale-Resolution Electron Microscopy.
Cell Culture Techniques
Cluster Analysis
DNA
/ radiation effects
DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded
/ radiation effects
DNA Damage
/ radiation effects
DNA Repair
/ radiation effects
Euchromatin
/ genetics
Fibroblasts
Heavy Ion Radiotherapy
/ adverse effects
Heavy Ions
/ adverse effects
Heterochromatin
/ genetics
Humans
Ku Autoantigen
/ genetics
Linear Energy Transfer
/ radiation effects
Microscopy, Electron
/ methods
Radiation, Ionizing
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs)
carbon ions
charged-particle radiotherapy
microbeam irradiation
non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)
transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jul 2021
16 Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
04
06
2021
revised:
06
07
2021
accepted:
15
07
2021
entrez:
24
7
2021
pubmed:
25
7
2021
medline:
5
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Charged-particle radiotherapy is an emerging treatment modality for radioresistant tumors. The enhanced effectiveness of high-energy particles (such as heavy ions) has been related to the spatial clustering of DNA lesions due to highly localized energy deposition. Here, DNA damage patterns induced by single and multiple carbon ions were analyzed in the nuclear chromatin environment by different high-resolution microscopy approaches. Using the heavy-ion microbeam SNAKE, fibroblast monolayers were irradiated with defined numbers of carbon ions (1/10/100 ions per pulse, ipp) focused to micrometer-sized stripes or spots. Radiation-induced lesions were visualized as DNA damage foci (γH2AX, 53BP1) by conventional fluorescence and stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy. At micro- and nanoscale level, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) were visualized within their chromatin context by labeling the Ku heterodimer. Single and clustered pKu70-labeled DSBs were quantified in euchromatic and heterochromatic regions at 0.1 h, 5 h and 24 h post-IR by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Increasing numbers of carbon ions per beam spot enhanced spatial clustering of DNA lesions and increased damage complexity with two or more DSBs in close proximity. This effect was detectable in euchromatin, but was much more pronounced in heterochromatin. Analyzing the dynamics of damage processing, our findings indicate that euchromatic DSBs were processed efficiently and repaired in a timely manner. In heterochromatin, by contrast, the number of clustered DSBs continuously increased further over the first hours following IR exposure, indicating the challenging task for the cell to process highly clustered DSBs appropriately. Increasing numbers of carbon ions applied to sub-nuclear chromatin regions enhanced the spatial clustering of DSBs and increased damage complexity, this being more pronounced in heterochromatic regions. Inefficient processing of clustered DSBs may explain the enhanced therapeutic efficacy of particle-based radiotherapy in cancer treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Charged-particle radiotherapy is an emerging treatment modality for radioresistant tumors. The enhanced effectiveness of high-energy particles (such as heavy ions) has been related to the spatial clustering of DNA lesions due to highly localized energy deposition. Here, DNA damage patterns induced by single and multiple carbon ions were analyzed in the nuclear chromatin environment by different high-resolution microscopy approaches.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
Using the heavy-ion microbeam SNAKE, fibroblast monolayers were irradiated with defined numbers of carbon ions (1/10/100 ions per pulse, ipp) focused to micrometer-sized stripes or spots. Radiation-induced lesions were visualized as DNA damage foci (γH2AX, 53BP1) by conventional fluorescence and stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy. At micro- and nanoscale level, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) were visualized within their chromatin context by labeling the Ku heterodimer. Single and clustered pKu70-labeled DSBs were quantified in euchromatic and heterochromatic regions at 0.1 h, 5 h and 24 h post-IR by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Increasing numbers of carbon ions per beam spot enhanced spatial clustering of DNA lesions and increased damage complexity with two or more DSBs in close proximity. This effect was detectable in euchromatin, but was much more pronounced in heterochromatin. Analyzing the dynamics of damage processing, our findings indicate that euchromatic DSBs were processed efficiently and repaired in a timely manner. In heterochromatin, by contrast, the number of clustered DSBs continuously increased further over the first hours following IR exposure, indicating the challenging task for the cell to process highly clustered DSBs appropriately.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Increasing numbers of carbon ions applied to sub-nuclear chromatin regions enhanced the spatial clustering of DSBs and increased damage complexity, this being more pronounced in heterochromatic regions. Inefficient processing of clustered DSBs may explain the enhanced therapeutic efficacy of particle-based radiotherapy in cancer treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34299263
pii: ijms22147638
doi: 10.3390/ijms22147638
pmc: PMC8306362
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Euchromatin
0
Heterochromatin
0
DNA
9007-49-2
Ku Autoantigen
EC 4.2.99.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Krebshilfe
ID : 70112268
Organisme : German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF)
ID : 02NUK035A & 02NUK058B.
Références
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e38165
pubmed: 22666473
DNA Repair (Amst). 2011 Apr 3;10(4):427-37
pubmed: 21342792
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017 Aug;18(8):495-506
pubmed: 28512351
Genes Dev. 2017 Nov 15;31(22):2204-2221
pubmed: 29284710
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 31;22(7):
pubmed: 33807337
J Radiat Res. 2019 Jan 1;60(1):69-79
pubmed: 30476166
Front Oncol. 2020 Feb 04;10:82
pubmed: 32117737
Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7847):660-665
pubmed: 33597753
DNA Repair (Amst). 2010 Dec 10;9(12):1219-28
pubmed: 21035408
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016 Apr;37:148-157
pubmed: 27266837
DNA Repair (Amst). 2015 Apr;28:93-106
pubmed: 25659339
Nanoscale. 2018 Mar 1;10(9):4320-4331
pubmed: 29443341
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Oct 17;12(10):
pubmed: 33080914
Med Phys. 2018 Nov;45(11):e925-e952
pubmed: 30421808
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 1;22(21):5300-5311
pubmed: 27199493
FASEB J. 2016 Aug;30(8):2767-76
pubmed: 27166088
Trends Genet. 2019 May;35(5):330-345
pubmed: 30898334
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2019 Oct;147:62-76
pubmed: 30851288
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Sep 19;44(16):7673-90
pubmed: 27257076
Int J Radiat Biol. 2019 Jan;95(1):3-11
pubmed: 29584515
J Cell Sci. 2019 Oct 9;132(19):
pubmed: 31492757
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Feb 18;10:42
pubmed: 25880907
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Aug 05;18(8):
pubmed: 28783053
Nat Cell Biol. 2019 Jan;21(1):72-84
pubmed: 30602772
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7716):117-121
pubmed: 30022168
Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 25;8(65):109370-109381
pubmed: 29312614