Patient preferences and priorities for haemophilia gene therapy in the US: A discrete choice experiment.
discrete choice experiment
haemophilia
health equity
patient preference
Journal
Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia
ISSN: 1365-2516
Titre abrégé: Haemophilia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9442916
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
revised:
23
06
2021
received:
29
04
2021
accepted:
15
07
2021
pubmed:
27
7
2021
medline:
25
9
2021
entrez:
26
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Gene therapy has shown promise in clinical trials for patients with haemophilia, but patient preference studies have focused on factor replacement treatments. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to investigate the relative importance and differential preferences patients provide for gene therapy attributes. We surveyed male adults with haemophilia in the United States recruited from patient panels including the National Hemophilia Foundation Community Voices in Research platform using an online survey over 4 months in 2020/21. Participants indicated preferences for gene therapy attributes including dosing frequency/durability, effect on annual bleeding, uncertainty related to side effects, impact on daily activities, impact on mental health, and post-treatment requirements. The relative importance of each attribute was analysed overall and for subgroups based on haemophilia type and severity. A total of 183 males with haemophilia A (n = 120) or B (n = 63) were included. Half (47%) had severe haemophilia; most (75%) were White. Overall, participants gave effect on bleeding rate the greatest relative importance (31%), followed by dose frequency/durability (26%), uncertainty regarding safety issues (17%), and impact on daily activities (11%). Dose frequency/durability had the greatest importance for those with haemophilia B (35%). People with haemophilia prioritised reduced bleeding and treatment burden; the former was more important in haemophilia A and the latter in haemophilia B, followed by safety and impact on daily life in this DCE of gene therapy attributes. These findings and differences can inform clinical and health policy decisions to improve health equity for people with haemophilia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34310811
doi: 10.1111/hae.14383
pmc: PMC9290457
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
769-782Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Haemophilia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15
pubmed: 27325321
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Jul;35(7):697-716
pubmed: 28374325
Value Health. 2020 Jul;23(7):831-841
pubmed: 32762984
BMJ. 2004 Feb 14;328(7436):360-1
pubmed: 14962852
Ther Adv Hematol. 2018 Aug 27;9(9):273-293
pubmed: 30210756
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Nov 23;9:1687-94
pubmed: 26648701
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 09;8:595797
pubmed: 33768101
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Sep 27;11:1677-1686
pubmed: 29033555
Haemophilia. 2018 May;24 Suppl 6:60-67
pubmed: 29878660
Health Econ. 2009 Aug;18(8):951-76
pubmed: 19034951
Patient. 2017 Jun;10(3):263-266
pubmed: 28247251
Blood. 2019 Jan 31;133(5):407-414
pubmed: 30559260
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Sep 20;13:1577-1587
pubmed: 31571840
Haemophilia. 2017 Jul;23(4):556-565
pubmed: 28419637
Blood Transfus. 2013 Apr;11(2):178-82
pubmed: 22790275
Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):588-96
pubmed: 25128052
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2005 Sep;1(3):189-99
pubmed: 18360559
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2019 Dec 6;2019(1):1-8
pubmed: 31808868
Br J Haematol. 2016 Aug;174(3):454-60
pubmed: 27098446
Haemophilia. 2020 Nov;26(6):e291-e299
pubmed: 32937681
Haemophilia. 2021 Sep;27(5):769-782
pubmed: 34310811
Haemophilia. 2021 Nov;27(6):957-966
pubmed: 34472162
Haemophilia. 2021 Jan;27(1):129-136
pubmed: 33161616
Haemophilia. 2020 Aug;26 Suppl 5:30-40
pubmed: 32935396