HIV Transgenic Rats Demonstrate Superior Task Acquisition and Intact Reversal Learning in the Within-Session Probabilistic Reversal Learning Task.
Effortful motivation
HAND
HIV transgenic rat
Probabilistic learning
Reversal learning
Journal
Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience
ISSN: 1531-135X
Titre abrégé: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101083946
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
accepted:
14
06
2021
pubmed:
28
7
2021
medline:
6
11
2021
entrez:
27
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The HIV transgenic (HIVtg) rat is a commonly used animal model of chronic HIV infection that exhibits a wide range of cognitive deficits. To date, relatively little work has been conducted on these rats' capacity for reversal learning, an assay of executive function and cognitive flexibility used in humans. The present study sought to determine the impact of HIV genotype on probabilistic reversal learning, effortful motivation, and spontaneous locomotion/exploration in rats. Male (n = 8) and female (n = 8) HIVtg rats and wildtype (WT) controls were utilized. Cognitive flexibility was assessed via the Probabilistic Reversal Learning Task (PRLT), which reinforced responses to two stimuli on differential probabilistic schedules that periodically reversed. Effortful motivation and locomotor/exploratory behavior were assessed via the Progressive Ratio Breakpoint Task (PRBT) and the Behavioral Pattern Monitor (BPM), respectively. Regardless of sex, HIVtg rats required fewer trials to ascertain initial PRLT reward schedules than WT rats, and completed the same number of reversals. Secondary behaviors suggested that HIVtg PRLT performance was facilitated by a speed-accuracy tradeoff strategy. No main or interactive effects of genotype were observed in the PRBT or BPM. Relative to WT controls, HIVtg rats exhibited superior probabilistic reinforcement learning. Reversal learning was unaffected by HIV genotype, as was effortful motivation and exploratory behavior. These findings contrast with previous characterizations of the HIVtg rat, thus indicating a nuanced cognitive profile that is dependent upon such task specifications as within- versus between-session assessment and probabilistic versus deterministic reward schedules.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34312815
doi: 10.3758/s13415-021-00926-5
pii: 10.3758/s13415-021-00926-5
pmc: PMC9815827
mid: NIHMS1858715
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1207-1221Subventions
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : P50 DA026306
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01 DA044909
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01 DA051295
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Références
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):827
pubmed: 30696863
J Neurovirol. 2011 Feb;17(1):3-16
pubmed: 21174240
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2011 Jun;98(4):587-97
pubmed: 21420997
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Sep;41(5):1024-34
pubmed: 26194891
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Jan;33(1):112-20
pubmed: 20694870
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Nov;37(9 Pt B):2125-40
pubmed: 22548905
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 31;98(16):9271-6
pubmed: 11481487
Schizophr Res. 2018 Mar;193:69-76
pubmed: 28673753
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Aug;23(7):605-615
pubmed: 28625210
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0152265
pubmed: 27010205
Neurology. 2014 Jun 10;82(23):2055-62
pubmed: 24814848
J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2014 Sep;9(4):508-21
pubmed: 24764039
Antiviral Res. 2010 Dec;88(3):334-42
pubmed: 20970459
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 May;35(6):1290-301
pubmed: 20107431
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004 May;10(3):317-31
pubmed: 15147590
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2016;28:287-303
pubmed: 27418071
J Neurovirol. 2018 Apr;24(2):229-245
pubmed: 28730408
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Sep 1;79(1):101-107
pubmed: 29847476
J Neurovirol. 2013 Apr;19(2):157-65
pubmed: 23456952
J Neurovirol. 2009 Sep;15(5-6):380-9
pubmed: 19995129
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 01;9(10):e108399
pubmed: 25271421
Neuron. 2004 Dec 2;44(5):865-76
pubmed: 15572116
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Nov 21;17:659-666
pubmed: 29204344
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar;14(1):388-406
pubmed: 23943516
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 9;39(2):295-306
pubmed: 30413646
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Nov 06;11:212
pubmed: 29163084
J Neurosci. 2014 Mar 26;34(13):4618-26
pubmed: 24672007
AIDS. 2004 Jan 1;18 Suppl 1:S19-25
pubmed: 15075494
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 9;8(1):136
pubmed: 29317696
Neurology. 2010 Dec 7;75(23):2087-96
pubmed: 21135382
J Neurovirol. 2009 Jan;15(1):14-24
pubmed: 19085205
Sci Rep. 2018 May 18;8(1):7869
pubmed: 29777165
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Jul;37(6):1139-49
pubmed: 23010529
Mol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;20(3):345-52
pubmed: 24840709
Neuropharmacology. 2019 May 15;150:15-26
pubmed: 30844406
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Nov 22;12:285
pubmed: 30524255
Brain Behav Immun. 2015 Aug;48:336-49
pubmed: 25733103
J Neurosci. 2016 Feb 10;36(6):1996-2006
pubmed: 26865622
Neuropsychology. 2017 Oct;31(7):798-810
pubmed: 28358552
Exp Neurol. 2013 Jan;239:139-47
pubmed: 23063600
Schizophr Res. 2007 Jul;93(1-3):296-303
pubmed: 17482797
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Jan;38(1):62-72
pubmed: 22102094