The Danish OPUS Early Intervention Services for First-Episode Psychosis: A Phase 4 Prospective Cohort Study With Comparison of Randomized Trial and Real-World Data.


Journal

The American journal of psychiatry
ISSN: 1535-7228
Titre abrégé: Am J Psychiatry
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370512

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 10 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 29 7 2021
medline: 12 10 2021
entrez: 28 7 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Danish OPUS trial showed significant efficacy of early intervention services for first-episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders compared with standard treatment, leading to implementation of the OPUS intervention in clinical practice. The authors sought to determine whether the effectiveness of OPUS treatment in real-world clinical practice is comparable to the efficacy seen in the trial. The study compared patients who received OPUS treatment as part of the original randomized trial to those who received standard treatment in the trial (the control group) and those who received OPUS treatment after it was implemented in Denmark. The authors investigated whether the three groups differed on register-based outcomes, such as use of secondary health care, functional outcomes, and death. Analyses were adjusted for relevant confounders. Compared with trial study participants, patients who received OPUS treatment after implementation (N=3,328) had a tendency toward lower mortality (hazard ratio=0.60, 95% CI=0.33, 1.09), fewer and shorter psychiatric admissions, and possibly fewer filled prescriptions of antipsychotics and other psycholeptics after 4 or 5 years. While at first less likely to be working or studying, patients who received postimplementation OPUS treatment eventually had higher odds of working than did those in the OPUS trial (after 5 years, odds ratio=1.49, 95% CI=1.07, 2.09). The odds of being in a couple relationship were also higher among patients in the postimplementation group than those in the trial. Other outcomes showed less clear associations with treatment group. Generally, the control group in the trial fared worse than both of the OPUS treatment groups. Not only did OPUS treatment maintain its efficacy after it was implemented as a standard treatment, it paralleled or surpassed many of the effects observed when the OPUS intervention was delivered in a randomized trial. The study results provide further evidence in support of implementation and funding of early intervention services worldwide.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34315283
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20111596
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antipsychotic Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

941-951

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Christine Merrild Posselt (CM)

Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health-CORE, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (all authors); Psykiatri Øst, Region Sjællands Psykiatri, Roskilde (Albert); Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen (Hjorthøj).

Nikolai Albert (N)

Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health-CORE, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (all authors); Psykiatri Øst, Region Sjællands Psykiatri, Roskilde (Albert); Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen (Hjorthøj).

Merete Nordentoft (M)

Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health-CORE, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (all authors); Psykiatri Øst, Region Sjællands Psykiatri, Roskilde (Albert); Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen (Hjorthøj).

Carsten Hjorthøj (C)

Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health-CORE, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (all authors); Psykiatri Øst, Region Sjællands Psykiatri, Roskilde (Albert); Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen (Hjorthøj).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH