Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19.
Antiparasitic Agents
/ adverse effects
Antiviral Agents
/ adverse effects
COVID-19
/ mortality
Cause of Death
Humans
Ivermectin
/ adverse effects
Placebos
/ therapeutic use
Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Respiration, Artificial
/ statistics & numerical data
SARS-CoV-2
/ drug effects
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
COVID-19 Drug Treatment
Journal
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 07 2021
28 07 2021
Historique:
entrez:
28
7
2021
pubmed:
29
7
2021
medline:
12
8
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ivermectin, an antiparasitic agent used to treat parasitic infestations, inhibits the replication of viruses in vitro. The molecular hypothesis of ivermectin's antiviral mode of action suggests an inhibitory effect on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication in the early stages of infection. Currently, evidence on efficacy and safety of ivermectin for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 treatment is conflicting. To assess the efficacy and safety of ivermectin compared to no treatment, standard of care, placebo, or any other proven intervention for people with COVID-19 receiving treatment as inpatients or outpatients, and for prevention of an infection with SARS-CoV-2 (postexposure prophylaxis). We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, Web of Science (Emerging Citation Index and Science Citation Index), medRxiv, and Research Square, identifying completed and ongoing studies without language restrictions to 26 May 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ivermectin to no treatment, standard of care, placebo, or another proven intervention for treatment of people with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis, irrespective of disease severity, treated in inpatient or outpatient settings, and for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Co-interventions had to be the same in both study arms. We excluded studies comparing ivermectin to other pharmacological interventions with unproven efficacy. We assessed RCTs for bias, using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. The primary analysis excluded studies with high risk of bias. We used GRADE to rate the certainty of evidence for the following outcomes 1. to treat inpatients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19: mortality, clinical worsening or improvement, adverse events, quality of life, duration of hospitalization, and viral clearance; 2. to treat outpatients with mild COVID-19: mortality, clinical worsening or improvement, admission to hospital, adverse events, quality of life, and viral clearance; (3) to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection: SARS-CoV-2 infection, development of COVID-19 symptoms, adverse events, mortality, admission to hospital, and quality of life. We found 14 studies with 1678 participants investigating ivermectin compared to no treatment, placebo, or standard of care. No study compared ivermectin to an intervention with proven efficacy. There were nine studies treating participants with moderate COVID-19 in inpatient settings and four treating mild COVID-19 cases in outpatient settings. One study investigated ivermectin for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eight studies had an open-label design, six were double-blind and placebo-controlled. Of the 41 study results contributed by included studies, about one third were at overall high risk of bias. Ivermectin doses and treatment duration varied among included studies. We identified 31 ongoing and 18 studies awaiting classification until publication of results or clarification of inconsistencies. Ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care for inpatient COVID-19 treatment We are uncertain whether ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care reduces or increases mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 2.51; 2 studies, 185 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and clinical worsening up to day 28 assessed as need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.59; 2 studies, 185 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or need for supplemental oxygen (0 participants required supplemental oxygen; 1 study, 45 participants; very low-certainty evidence), adverse events within 28 days (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.97; 1 study, 152 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and viral clearance at day seven (RR 1.82, 95% CI 0.51 to 6.48; 2 studies, 159 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Ivermectin may have little or no effect compared to placebo or standard of care on clinical improvement up to 28 days (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.35; 1 study; 73 participants; low-certainty evidence) and duration of hospitalization (mean difference (MD) -0.10 days, 95% CI -2.43 to 2.23; 1 study; 45 participants; low-certainty evidence). No study reported quality of life up to 28 days. Ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care for outpatient COVID-19 treatment We are uncertain whether ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care reduces or increases mortality up to 28 days (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.05; 2 studies, 422 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and clinical worsening up to 14 days assessed as need for IMV (RR 2.97, 95% CI 0.12 to 72.47; 1 study, 398 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or non-IMV or high flow oxygen requirement (0 participants required non-IMV or high flow; 1 study, 398 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether ivermectin compared to placebo reduces or increases viral clearance at seven days (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.13 to 67.06; 1 study, 24 participants; low-certainty evidence). Ivermectin may have little or no effect compared to placebo or standard of care on the number of participants with symptoms resolved up to 14 days (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.21; 1 study, 398 participants; low-certainty evidence) and adverse events within 28 days (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.05; 2 studies, 422 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reporting duration of symptoms were eligible for primary analysis. No study reported hospital admission or quality of life up to 14 days. Ivermectin compared to no treatment for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection We found one study. Mortality up to 28 days was the only outcome eligible for primary analysis. We are uncertain whether ivermectin reduces or increases mortality compared to no treatment (0 participants died; 1 study, 304 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study reported results for development of COVID-19 symptoms and adverse events up to 14 days that were included in a secondary analysis due to high risk of bias. No study reported SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospital admission, and quality of life up to 14 days. Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality. Several studies are underway that may produce clearer answers in review updates. Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Ivermectin, an antiparasitic agent used to treat parasitic infestations, inhibits the replication of viruses in vitro. The molecular hypothesis of ivermectin's antiviral mode of action suggests an inhibitory effect on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication in the early stages of infection. Currently, evidence on efficacy and safety of ivermectin for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 treatment is conflicting.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and safety of ivermectin compared to no treatment, standard of care, placebo, or any other proven intervention for people with COVID-19 receiving treatment as inpatients or outpatients, and for prevention of an infection with SARS-CoV-2 (postexposure prophylaxis).
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, Web of Science (Emerging Citation Index and Science Citation Index), medRxiv, and Research Square, identifying completed and ongoing studies without language restrictions to 26 May 2021.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ivermectin to no treatment, standard of care, placebo, or another proven intervention for treatment of people with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis, irrespective of disease severity, treated in inpatient or outpatient settings, and for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Co-interventions had to be the same in both study arms. We excluded studies comparing ivermectin to other pharmacological interventions with unproven efficacy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We assessed RCTs for bias, using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. The primary analysis excluded studies with high risk of bias. We used GRADE to rate the certainty of evidence for the following outcomes 1. to treat inpatients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19: mortality, clinical worsening or improvement, adverse events, quality of life, duration of hospitalization, and viral clearance; 2. to treat outpatients with mild COVID-19: mortality, clinical worsening or improvement, admission to hospital, adverse events, quality of life, and viral clearance; (3) to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection: SARS-CoV-2 infection, development of COVID-19 symptoms, adverse events, mortality, admission to hospital, and quality of life.
MAIN RESULTS
We found 14 studies with 1678 participants investigating ivermectin compared to no treatment, placebo, or standard of care. No study compared ivermectin to an intervention with proven efficacy. There were nine studies treating participants with moderate COVID-19 in inpatient settings and four treating mild COVID-19 cases in outpatient settings. One study investigated ivermectin for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eight studies had an open-label design, six were double-blind and placebo-controlled. Of the 41 study results contributed by included studies, about one third were at overall high risk of bias. Ivermectin doses and treatment duration varied among included studies. We identified 31 ongoing and 18 studies awaiting classification until publication of results or clarification of inconsistencies. Ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care for inpatient COVID-19 treatment We are uncertain whether ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care reduces or increases mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 2.51; 2 studies, 185 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and clinical worsening up to day 28 assessed as need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.11 to 2.59; 2 studies, 185 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or need for supplemental oxygen (0 participants required supplemental oxygen; 1 study, 45 participants; very low-certainty evidence), adverse events within 28 days (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.97; 1 study, 152 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and viral clearance at day seven (RR 1.82, 95% CI 0.51 to 6.48; 2 studies, 159 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Ivermectin may have little or no effect compared to placebo or standard of care on clinical improvement up to 28 days (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.35; 1 study; 73 participants; low-certainty evidence) and duration of hospitalization (mean difference (MD) -0.10 days, 95% CI -2.43 to 2.23; 1 study; 45 participants; low-certainty evidence). No study reported quality of life up to 28 days. Ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care for outpatient COVID-19 treatment We are uncertain whether ivermectin compared to placebo or standard of care reduces or increases mortality up to 28 days (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.05; 2 studies, 422 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and clinical worsening up to 14 days assessed as need for IMV (RR 2.97, 95% CI 0.12 to 72.47; 1 study, 398 participants; very low-certainty evidence) or non-IMV or high flow oxygen requirement (0 participants required non-IMV or high flow; 1 study, 398 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether ivermectin compared to placebo reduces or increases viral clearance at seven days (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.13 to 67.06; 1 study, 24 participants; low-certainty evidence). Ivermectin may have little or no effect compared to placebo or standard of care on the number of participants with symptoms resolved up to 14 days (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.21; 1 study, 398 participants; low-certainty evidence) and adverse events within 28 days (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.05; 2 studies, 422 participants; low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reporting duration of symptoms were eligible for primary analysis. No study reported hospital admission or quality of life up to 14 days. Ivermectin compared to no treatment for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection We found one study. Mortality up to 28 days was the only outcome eligible for primary analysis. We are uncertain whether ivermectin reduces or increases mortality compared to no treatment (0 participants died; 1 study, 304 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study reported results for development of COVID-19 symptoms and adverse events up to 14 days that were included in a secondary analysis due to high risk of bias. No study reported SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospital admission, and quality of life up to 14 days.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Based on the current very low- to low-certainty evidence, we are uncertain about the efficacy and safety of ivermectin used to treat or prevent COVID-19. The completed studies are small and few are considered high quality. Several studies are underway that may produce clearer answers in review updates. Overall, the reliable evidence available does not support the use ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 outside of well-designed randomized trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34318930
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015017.pub2
pmc: PMC8406455
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiparasitic Agents
0
Antiviral Agents
0
Placebos
0
Ivermectin
70288-86-7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
CD015017Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : UpdateIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.
Références
Antiviral Res. 2013 Sep;99(3):301-6
pubmed: 23769930
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Dec;27(12):1743-1749
pubmed: 34483029
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 12;2:CD013587
pubmed: 33624299
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Dec 18;7:599533
pubmed: 33392222
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2022 Jun;27(3):156-158
pubmed: 33888547
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):693-704
pubmed: 32678530
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6
pubmed: 21208779
Chest. 2021 Jan;159(1):85-92
pubmed: 33065103
New Microbes New Infect. 2021 Sep;43:100915
pubmed: 34249367
QJM. 2022 Jan 5;114(11):780-788
pubmed: 33599247
Infect Dis Rep. 2022 Mar 03;14(2):160-168
pubmed: 35314650
Trials. 2021 Jan 04;22(1):4
pubmed: 33397429
Am J Ther. 2021 Jun 21;28(4):e434-e460
pubmed: 34145166
BMJ. 2020 Sep 4;370:m3379
pubmed: 32887691
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):481-482
pubmed: 33077974
Viruses. 2021 May 26;13(6):
pubmed: 34073401
Ann Parasitol. 2015;61(1):11-6
pubmed: 25911032
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):739-740
pubmed: 32777028
BMC Med. 2010 Mar 24;8:18
pubmed: 20334633
Trials. 2020 Jun 08;21(1):498
pubmed: 32513289
Crit Care. 2020 Apr 28;24(1):179
pubmed: 32345311
BMJ. 2020 May 12;369:m1808
pubmed: 32398230
AAPS J. 2008;10(1):42-6
pubmed: 18446504
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:598-605
pubmed: 33578014
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 28;7:CD015017
pubmed: 34318930
Biochem J. 2012 May 1;443(3):851-6
pubmed: 22417684
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Feb;32:100720
pubmed: 33495752
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):430-436
pubmed: 32640463
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 May 4;21(1):411
pubmed: 33947344
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534
pubmed: 32087114
Front Microbiol. 2015 Jun 02;6:553
pubmed: 26082769
Toxicol Rep. 2021;8:505-510
pubmed: 33723507
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:214-216
pubmed: 33278625
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):e192-e197
pubmed: 32539990
Antiviral Res. 2020 Jun;178:104787
pubmed: 32251768
Int J Dermatol. 2005 Dec;44(12):981-8
pubmed: 16409259
JAMA. 2021 Apr 13;325(14):1426-1435
pubmed: 33662102
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506
pubmed: 31986264
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 May;106:314-322
pubmed: 33864917
Clin Ther. 2021 Jun;43(6):1007-1019
pubmed: 34052007
Trials. 2021 Apr 09;22(1):262
pubmed: 33836826
J Int Med Res. 2021 May;49(5):3000605211013550
pubmed: 33983065
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 11;15(11):e0242184
pubmed: 33175880
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 12;6(7):e010247
pubmed: 27406637
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2021;24:343-350
pubmed: 34265236
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Aug;54(2):134-142
pubmed: 31071469
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 21;9(2):
pubmed: 32098019
Trials. 2020 Nov 24;21(1):965
pubmed: 33234158
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1813-1826
pubmed: 32445440
Am J Ther. 2021 Apr 22;28(3):e299-e318
pubmed: 34375047
Science. 1983 Aug 26;221(4613):823-8
pubmed: 6308762
Ann Intern Med. 2021 May;174(5):655-662
pubmed: 33481642
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 18;6:23138
pubmed: 26988202
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Sep;8(9):853-862
pubmed: 32735842
Antiviral Res. 2020 May;177:104760
pubmed: 32135219
Pathog Glob Health. 2021 Jun;115(4):235-242
pubmed: 33682640