Early Rhythm Control Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
/ therapeutic use
Atrial Fibrillation
/ physiopathology
Female
Heart Failure
/ therapy
Humans
Male
Secondary Prevention
Stroke
/ therapy
Stroke Volume
/ physiology
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
/ physiopathology
Ventricular Function, Left
/ physiology
acute coronary syndrome
anti-arrhythmia agents
atrial fibrillation
atrial fibrillation ablation
controlled clinical trial
death
heart failure
stroke
Journal
Circulation
ISSN: 1524-4539
Titre abrégé: Circulation
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0147763
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 09 2021
14 09 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
31
7
2021
medline:
30
12
2021
entrez:
30
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Even on optimal therapy, many patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation experience cardiovascular complications. Additional treatments are needed to reduce these events, especially in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. This prespecified subanalysis of the randomized EAST-AFNET4 trial (Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial) assessed the effect of systematic, early rhythm control therapy (ERC; using antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation) compared with usual care (allowing rhythm control therapy to improve symptoms) on the 2 primary outcomes of the trial and on selected secondary outcomes in patients with heart failure, defined as heart failure symptoms New York Heart Association II to III or left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%. This analysis included 798 patients (300 [37.6%] female, median age 71.0 [64.0, 76.0] years, 785 with known LVEF). The majority of patients (n=442) had heart failure and preserved LVEF (LVEF≥50%; mean LVEF 61±6.3%), the others had heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (n=211; LVEF 40%-49%; mean LVEF 44 ± 2.9%) or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=132; LVEF<40%; mean LVEF 31±5.5%). Over the 5.1-year median follow-up, the composite primary outcome of cardiovascular death, stroke, or hospitalization for worsening of heart failure or for acute coronary syndrome occurred less often in patients randomly assigned to ERC (94/396; 5.7 per 100 patient-years) compared with patients randomly assigned to usual care (130/402; 7.9 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio, 0.74 [0.56-0.97]; Rhythm control therapy conveys clinical benefit when initiated within 1 year of diagnosing atrial fibrillation in patients with signs or symptoms of heart failure. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01288352. URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com; Unique identifier: ISRCTN04708680. URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu; Unique identifier: 2010-021258-20.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Even on optimal therapy, many patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation experience cardiovascular complications. Additional treatments are needed to reduce these events, especially in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
METHODS
This prespecified subanalysis of the randomized EAST-AFNET4 trial (Early Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention Trial) assessed the effect of systematic, early rhythm control therapy (ERC; using antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation) compared with usual care (allowing rhythm control therapy to improve symptoms) on the 2 primary outcomes of the trial and on selected secondary outcomes in patients with heart failure, defined as heart failure symptoms New York Heart Association II to III or left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%.
RESULTS
This analysis included 798 patients (300 [37.6%] female, median age 71.0 [64.0, 76.0] years, 785 with known LVEF). The majority of patients (n=442) had heart failure and preserved LVEF (LVEF≥50%; mean LVEF 61±6.3%), the others had heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (n=211; LVEF 40%-49%; mean LVEF 44 ± 2.9%) or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=132; LVEF<40%; mean LVEF 31±5.5%). Over the 5.1-year median follow-up, the composite primary outcome of cardiovascular death, stroke, or hospitalization for worsening of heart failure or for acute coronary syndrome occurred less often in patients randomly assigned to ERC (94/396; 5.7 per 100 patient-years) compared with patients randomly assigned to usual care (130/402; 7.9 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio, 0.74 [0.56-0.97];
CONCLUSIONS
Rhythm control therapy conveys clinical benefit when initiated within 1 year of diagnosing atrial fibrillation in patients with signs or symptoms of heart failure. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01288352. URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com; Unique identifier: ISRCTN04708680. URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu; Unique identifier: 2010-021258-20.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34328366
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056323
pmc: PMC8456351
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01288352']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
845-858Subventions
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/13/43/30324
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : AA/18/2/34218
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : PG/18/33/33780
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : PG/20/22/35093
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : PG/17/30/32961
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Circulation. 2016 Feb 2;133(5):484-92
pubmed: 26746177
Eur Heart J. 2019 Apr 21;40(16):1268-1276
pubmed: 30615112
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 23;359(17):1778-85
pubmed: 18946063
Europace. 2021 Mar 8;23(3):329-344
pubmed: 33555020
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 5;9(9):e015218
pubmed: 32351154
Circulation. 2019 Jul 9;140(2):e125-e151
pubmed: 30686041
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jul 1;41(25):2379-2392
pubmed: 32221582
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Dec;12(12):e007731
pubmed: 31760819
Am Heart J. 2013 Sep;166(3):442-8
pubmed: 24016492
Eur Heart J. 2019 Dec 7;40(46):3793-3799c
pubmed: 31755940
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 02;379(5):492
pubmed: 30067924
Eur Heart J. 2018 Dec 21;39(48):4277-4284
pubmed: 30325423
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 15;362(15):1363-73
pubmed: 20231232
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Nov;26(11):1169-1179
pubmed: 26217925
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Jun;14(6):HAE0000000000000078
pubmed: 34129347
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 1;383(14):1305-1316
pubmed: 32865375
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 17;70(16):1949-1961
pubmed: 28855115
Lancet. 2014 Dec 20;384(9961):2235-43
pubmed: 25193873
N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 6;337(19):1360-9
pubmed: 9358131
Circulation. 2021 Apr 6;143(14):1377-1390
pubmed: 33554614
Lancet. 2020 Sep 19;396(10254):819-829
pubmed: 32877652
Europace. 2016 Nov;18(11):1609-1678
pubmed: 27567465
Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23):2920-5
pubmed: 12771006
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498
pubmed: 32860505
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 19;358(25):2667-77
pubmed: 18565859
JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):498-506
pubmed: 24496537
Circulation. 2016 Apr 26;133(17):1637-44
pubmed: 27029350
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 01;378(5):417-427
pubmed: 29385358
Europace. 2016 Oct;18(10):1455-1490
pubmed: 27402624
Europace. 2021 Sep 8;23(9):1359-1368
pubmed: 33899093
JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1261-1274
pubmed: 30874766