Comparative efficacy of single-inhaler triple therapies for COPD: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Administration, Inhalation
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
/ administration & dosage
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists
/ administration & dosage
Disease Progression
Drug Therapy, Combination
Humans
Muscarinic Antagonists
/ administration & dosage
Prognosis
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
/ drug therapy
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
30
05
2021
accepted:
29
07
2021
entrez:
5
8
2021
pubmed:
6
8
2021
medline:
30
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
2021 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Reports recommends that patients with clinically significant symptoms and exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should escalate to triple therapy, a combined use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) and long-acting b2-agonists (LABA)(ICS/LAMA/LABA). Triple therapy in fixed-dose combinations (FDCs), i.e., combining ICS, LABA with LAMA and administrating by a single inhalation device, has appeared in recent years. This study aims to compare the efficacy of triple therapy in FDCs in treating patients with moderate to severe COPD. Literature search will be conducted on PubMed, Embase and Web of science, according to pre-specified and corresponding search strategies, for relevant reports published since the inception dates of the databases. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) which compared the triple therapy in FDCs with other pharmacological therapies will be included. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool (RoB 2) will be used to assess the RCT quality. The outcomes will be analyzed as rate ratios and mean differences under a random-effects model in a frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA). Additional statistical analyses including subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias analysis will be performed to assess the evidential heterogeneity and robustness. The strength of evidence from the NMA will be evaluated with the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methods. No ethics approval is required as this systematic review and network meta-analysis do not collect confidential personal data and do not carry out interventions in treating patients. CRD42021240823.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34351996
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255545
pii: PONE-D-21-15399
pmc: PMC8341520
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
0
Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists
0
Muscarinic Antagonists
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0255545Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Oct 15;10:2207-17
pubmed: 26527869
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug 15;196(4):438-446
pubmed: 28375647
Respir Res. 2019 Nov 4;20(1):242
pubmed: 31684965
Adv Ther. 2020 Jun;37(6):2956-2975
pubmed: 32335859
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):777-84
pubmed: 26030634
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Respir Res. 2018 Jan 25;19(1):19
pubmed: 29370819
Respir Res. 2020 May 29;21(1):131
pubmed: 32471423
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1459-1544
pubmed: 27733281
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;13:1753466619885522
pubmed: 31694491
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Oct;6(10):747-758
pubmed: 30232048
Intern Med J. 2010 May;40(5):364-71
pubmed: 20180870
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jul 11;14:1539-1548
pubmed: 31371939
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Mar;1(1):73-83
pubmed: 24321806
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602
pubmed: 27733282
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6
pubmed: 18436948
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088-101
pubmed: 7786990
Clin Respir J. 2019 Jul;13(7):413-428
pubmed: 30947394
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 03;378(18):1671-1680
pubmed: 29668352
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 29;18(3):e1003583
pubmed: 33780438
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 2;383(1):35-48
pubmed: 32579807
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 1;369(5):448-57
pubmed: 23902484
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Arch Bronconeumol. 2020 Apr;56(4):242-248
pubmed: 35373739
Lancet. 2016 Sep 3;388(10048):963-73
pubmed: 27598678
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2018 Jan-Dec;12:1753466618760779
pubmed: 29537340
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;54(10):1046-55
pubmed: 11576817
Arch Bronconeumol. 2017 Aug;53(8):419-420
pubmed: 28314634
Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1919-1929
pubmed: 28385353
BMJ. 2018 Nov 06;363:k4388
pubmed: 30401700
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017 Jan-Mar;15(1):943
pubmed: 28503228
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Sep 1;127(5):380-7
pubmed: 9273830
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Jul 31;15:58
pubmed: 26227148
Lancet. 2018 Mar 17;391(10125):1076-1084
pubmed: 29429593
Eur Respir J. 2018 Dec 13;52(6):
pubmed: 30309975