Toxicity after moderately hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated prostate radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature.


Journal

Critical reviews in oncology/hematology
ISSN: 1879-0461
Titre abrégé: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8916049

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Historique:
received: 12 10 2020
revised: 06 07 2021
accepted: 28 07 2021
pubmed: 6 8 2021
medline: 15 9 2021
entrez: 5 8 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) currently represents the standard RT approach for all prostate cancer (PCa) risk categories. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature, focusing on acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) of moderate hypofractionation for localized PCa. Literature search was performed and two independent reviewers selected the records according to the following Population (P) Intervention (I) Comparator (C) and Outcomes (O) (PICO) question: "In patients affected by localized PCa (P), moderately hypofractionated RT (defined as a treatment schedule providing a single dose per fraction of 3-4.5 Gy) (I) can be considered equivalent to conventionally fractionated RT (C) in terms of G > 2 GI and GU acute and late adverse events (O)?". Bias assessment was performed using Cochrane Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias. Thirteen records were identified and a meta-analysis was performed. Risk of acute GI and GU > 2 adverse events in the moderately hypofractionated arm was increased by 9.8 % (95 %CI 4.8 %-14.7 %; I Overall, majority of trials included in our meta-analysis suggested that moderately hypofractionated RT is equivalent, in terms of GI and GU adverse events, to conventional fractionation. Pooled analysis showed a trend to increased GI toxicity after hypofractionated treatment, but this might be related to dose escalation rather than hypofractionation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) currently represents the standard RT approach for all prostate cancer (PCa) risk categories. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature, focusing on acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) of moderate hypofractionation for localized PCa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
Literature search was performed and two independent reviewers selected the records according to the following Population (P) Intervention (I) Comparator (C) and Outcomes (O) (PICO) question: "In patients affected by localized PCa (P), moderately hypofractionated RT (defined as a treatment schedule providing a single dose per fraction of 3-4.5 Gy) (I) can be considered equivalent to conventionally fractionated RT (C) in terms of G > 2 GI and GU acute and late adverse events (O)?". Bias assessment was performed using Cochrane Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias.
RESULTS RESULTS
Thirteen records were identified and a meta-analysis was performed. Risk of acute GI and GU > 2 adverse events in the moderately hypofractionated arm was increased by 9.8 % (95 %CI 4.8 %-14.7 %; I
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Overall, majority of trials included in our meta-analysis suggested that moderately hypofractionated RT is equivalent, in terms of GI and GU adverse events, to conventional fractionation. Pooled analysis showed a trend to increased GI toxicity after hypofractionated treatment, but this might be related to dose escalation rather than hypofractionation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34352361
pii: S1040-8428(21)00220-1
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103432
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103432

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

G Francolini (G)

Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

B Detti (B)

Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. Electronic address: beatrice.detti@aouc.unifi.it.

C Becherini (C)

Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

S Caini (S)

Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy.

G Ingrosso (G)

Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Italy.

Vanessa Di Cataldo (V)

Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

G Stocchi (G)

Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

V Salvestrini (V)

Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

A Lancia (A)

Department of Medical Sciences and Infectious Disease, Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.

D Scartoni (D)

Proton Treatment Center, Azienda Provinciale Per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.

I Giacomelli (I)

Proton Treatment Center, Azienda Provinciale Per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy.

A Sardaro (A)

Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.

R Carbonara (R)

Radiation Oncology Department, General Regional Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy.

S Borghesi (S)

Radiotherapy Department, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.

C Aristei (C)

Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Italy.

L Livi (L)

Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH